TY - JOUR
T1 - A Bayesian Approach in Estimating Transition Probabilities of a Discrete-time Markov Chain for Ignorable Intermittent Missing Data
AU - Ma, Junsheng
AU - Yu, Xiaoying
AU - Symanski, Elaine
AU - Doody, Rachelle
AU - Chan, Wenyaw
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016, Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2016/8/8
Y1 - 2016/8/8
N2 - This article focuses on data analyses under the scenario of missing at random within discrete-time Markov chain models. The naive method, nonlinear (NL) method, and Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithm are discussed. We extend the NL method into a Bayesian framework, using an adjusted rejection algorithm to sample the posterior distribution, and estimating the transition probabilities with a Monte Carlo algorithm. We compare the Bayesian nonlinear (BNL) method with the naive method and the EM algorithm with various missing rates, and comprehensively evaluate estimators in terms of biases, variances, mean square errors, and coverage probabilities (CPs). Our simulation results show that the EM algorithm usually offers smallest variances but with poorest CP, while the BNL method has smaller variances and better/similar CP as compared to the naive method. When the missing rate is low (about 9%, MAR), the three methods are comparable. Whereas when the missing rate is high (about 25%, MAR), overall, the BNL method performs slightly but consistently better than the naive method regarding variances and CP. Data from a longitudinal study of stress level among caregivers of individuals with Alzheimer’s disease is used to illustrate these methods.
AB - This article focuses on data analyses under the scenario of missing at random within discrete-time Markov chain models. The naive method, nonlinear (NL) method, and Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithm are discussed. We extend the NL method into a Bayesian framework, using an adjusted rejection algorithm to sample the posterior distribution, and estimating the transition probabilities with a Monte Carlo algorithm. We compare the Bayesian nonlinear (BNL) method with the naive method and the EM algorithm with various missing rates, and comprehensively evaluate estimators in terms of biases, variances, mean square errors, and coverage probabilities (CPs). Our simulation results show that the EM algorithm usually offers smallest variances but with poorest CP, while the BNL method has smaller variances and better/similar CP as compared to the naive method. When the missing rate is low (about 9%, MAR), the three methods are comparable. Whereas when the missing rate is high (about 25%, MAR), overall, the BNL method performs slightly but consistently better than the naive method regarding variances and CP. Data from a longitudinal study of stress level among caregivers of individuals with Alzheimer’s disease is used to illustrate these methods.
KW - Bayesian
KW - EM algorithm
KW - Markov chain
KW - Missing data
KW - Rejection algorithm
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84975299940&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84975299940&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/03610918.2014.911895
DO - 10.1080/03610918.2014.911895
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84975299940
SN - 0361-0918
VL - 45
SP - 2598
EP - 2616
JO - Communications in Statistics: Simulation and Computation
JF - Communications in Statistics: Simulation and Computation
IS - 7
ER -