A comparison of regular rehabilitation and regular rehabilitation with supported treadmill ambulation training for acute stroke patients

Inácio Teixeira da Cunha Filho, Peter A C Lim, Huma Qureshy, Helene Henson, Trilok Monga, Elizabeth J. Protas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

85 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this pilot study was to compare differences in motor recovery between regular rehabilitation (REG), and regular rehabilitation with supported treadmill ambulation training (STAT) using the performance on a bicycle exercise test and the locomotor scale of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM-L). Twelve patients with acute strokes were randomly assigned to either REG or STAT for 2 to 3 weeks. The STAT group received daily gait training utilizing a treadmill with partial support of body weight. After intervention, the STAT group had higher oxygen consumption (11.34 ± 0.88 vs 8.32 ± 0.88 ml/kg/min, p=0.039), total workload (58.75 ± 7.09 vs 45.42 ± 7.09 watts, p=ns), and total time pedaling the bike (288.91 ± 30.61 vs 211.42 ± 30.61 s, p=ns) compared to the REG group. The FIM-L scores were not different for the two groups. This pilot study suggests that the STAT intervention is a promising technique for acute stroke rehabilitation, and that future studies with larger sample sizes are warranted to establish the effectiveness of this intervention.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)245-255
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Rehabilitation Research and Development
Volume38
Issue number2
StatePublished - 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Exercise equipment
Patient rehabilitation
Walking
Rehabilitation
Stroke
Workload
Exercise Test
Gait
Oxygen Consumption
Sample Size
Foot
Body Weight
Recovery
Oxygen

Keywords

  • Acute stroke
  • Bike stress test
  • Rehabilitation
  • Supported treadmill ambulation training

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Health Professions(all)
  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

Teixeira da Cunha Filho, I., Lim, P. A. C., Qureshy, H., Henson, H., Monga, T., & Protas, E. J. (2001). A comparison of regular rehabilitation and regular rehabilitation with supported treadmill ambulation training for acute stroke patients. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 38(2), 245-255.

A comparison of regular rehabilitation and regular rehabilitation with supported treadmill ambulation training for acute stroke patients. / Teixeira da Cunha Filho, Inácio; Lim, Peter A C; Qureshy, Huma; Henson, Helene; Monga, Trilok; Protas, Elizabeth J.

In: Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, Vol. 38, No. 2, 2001, p. 245-255.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Teixeira da Cunha Filho, Inácio ; Lim, Peter A C ; Qureshy, Huma ; Henson, Helene ; Monga, Trilok ; Protas, Elizabeth J. / A comparison of regular rehabilitation and regular rehabilitation with supported treadmill ambulation training for acute stroke patients. In: Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development. 2001 ; Vol. 38, No. 2. pp. 245-255.
@article{cd31e4ef2f2e403884a39b6a178df112,
title = "A comparison of regular rehabilitation and regular rehabilitation with supported treadmill ambulation training for acute stroke patients",
abstract = "The purpose of this pilot study was to compare differences in motor recovery between regular rehabilitation (REG), and regular rehabilitation with supported treadmill ambulation training (STAT) using the performance on a bicycle exercise test and the locomotor scale of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM-L). Twelve patients with acute strokes were randomly assigned to either REG or STAT for 2 to 3 weeks. The STAT group received daily gait training utilizing a treadmill with partial support of body weight. After intervention, the STAT group had higher oxygen consumption (11.34 ± 0.88 vs 8.32 ± 0.88 ml/kg/min, p=0.039), total workload (58.75 ± 7.09 vs 45.42 ± 7.09 watts, p=ns), and total time pedaling the bike (288.91 ± 30.61 vs 211.42 ± 30.61 s, p=ns) compared to the REG group. The FIM-L scores were not different for the two groups. This pilot study suggests that the STAT intervention is a promising technique for acute stroke rehabilitation, and that future studies with larger sample sizes are warranted to establish the effectiveness of this intervention.",
keywords = "Acute stroke, Bike stress test, Rehabilitation, Supported treadmill ambulation training",
author = "{Teixeira da Cunha Filho}, In{\'a}cio and Lim, {Peter A C} and Huma Qureshy and Helene Henson and Trilok Monga and Protas, {Elizabeth J.}",
year = "2001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "245--255",
journal = "Journal of rehabilitation R&D",
issn = "0748-7711",
publisher = "Rehabilitation Research and Development Service",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of regular rehabilitation and regular rehabilitation with supported treadmill ambulation training for acute stroke patients

AU - Teixeira da Cunha Filho, Inácio

AU - Lim, Peter A C

AU - Qureshy, Huma

AU - Henson, Helene

AU - Monga, Trilok

AU - Protas, Elizabeth J.

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - The purpose of this pilot study was to compare differences in motor recovery between regular rehabilitation (REG), and regular rehabilitation with supported treadmill ambulation training (STAT) using the performance on a bicycle exercise test and the locomotor scale of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM-L). Twelve patients with acute strokes were randomly assigned to either REG or STAT for 2 to 3 weeks. The STAT group received daily gait training utilizing a treadmill with partial support of body weight. After intervention, the STAT group had higher oxygen consumption (11.34 ± 0.88 vs 8.32 ± 0.88 ml/kg/min, p=0.039), total workload (58.75 ± 7.09 vs 45.42 ± 7.09 watts, p=ns), and total time pedaling the bike (288.91 ± 30.61 vs 211.42 ± 30.61 s, p=ns) compared to the REG group. The FIM-L scores were not different for the two groups. This pilot study suggests that the STAT intervention is a promising technique for acute stroke rehabilitation, and that future studies with larger sample sizes are warranted to establish the effectiveness of this intervention.

AB - The purpose of this pilot study was to compare differences in motor recovery between regular rehabilitation (REG), and regular rehabilitation with supported treadmill ambulation training (STAT) using the performance on a bicycle exercise test and the locomotor scale of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM-L). Twelve patients with acute strokes were randomly assigned to either REG or STAT for 2 to 3 weeks. The STAT group received daily gait training utilizing a treadmill with partial support of body weight. After intervention, the STAT group had higher oxygen consumption (11.34 ± 0.88 vs 8.32 ± 0.88 ml/kg/min, p=0.039), total workload (58.75 ± 7.09 vs 45.42 ± 7.09 watts, p=ns), and total time pedaling the bike (288.91 ± 30.61 vs 211.42 ± 30.61 s, p=ns) compared to the REG group. The FIM-L scores were not different for the two groups. This pilot study suggests that the STAT intervention is a promising technique for acute stroke rehabilitation, and that future studies with larger sample sizes are warranted to establish the effectiveness of this intervention.

KW - Acute stroke

KW - Bike stress test

KW - Rehabilitation

KW - Supported treadmill ambulation training

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035707525&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035707525&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 245

EP - 255

JO - Journal of rehabilitation R&D

JF - Journal of rehabilitation R&D

SN - 0748-7711

IS - 2

ER -