A comparison of two interviews for DSM-III-R personality disorders

Michael O'Boyle, David Self

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

65 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The study examined agreement between personality disorder diagnoses obtained using two structured interviews and the effect of depression on the diagnoses obtained. Twenty subjects were interviewed while depressed, using the Personality Disorder Examination and the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R Personality Disorder; both interviews are designed to yield DSM-III-R personality disorder diagnoses. Eighteen subjects were reinterviewed later, 17 after recovery. Diagnostic agreement between the two instruments for any disorder was fair (kappa = 0.38). Kappas for the personality disorder clusters ranged from 0.08 to 0.83. Kappas for individual personality disorders ranged from 0.18 for paranoid disorder to 0.62 for borderline disorder. While the depressive state did not consistently affect categorical diagnoses, dimensional scores tended to be higher when patients were depressed. A dimensional profile, in which scores on each disorder are generated for subjects, may be more reliable than categorical diagnoses derived from the same instrument.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)85-92
Number of pages8
JournalPsychiatry Research
Volume32
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1990

Fingerprint

Personality Disorders
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Interviews
Paranoid Disorders
Depression

Keywords

  • depression
  • Personality disorder
  • structured interview

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

A comparison of two interviews for DSM-III-R personality disorders. / O'Boyle, Michael; Self, David.

In: Psychiatry Research, Vol. 32, No. 1, 1990, p. 85-92.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

O'Boyle, Michael ; Self, David. / A comparison of two interviews for DSM-III-R personality disorders. In: Psychiatry Research. 1990 ; Vol. 32, No. 1. pp. 85-92.
@article{816e7eb00b7f4960a522e7fa63659a77,
title = "A comparison of two interviews for DSM-III-R personality disorders",
abstract = "The study examined agreement between personality disorder diagnoses obtained using two structured interviews and the effect of depression on the diagnoses obtained. Twenty subjects were interviewed while depressed, using the Personality Disorder Examination and the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R Personality Disorder; both interviews are designed to yield DSM-III-R personality disorder diagnoses. Eighteen subjects were reinterviewed later, 17 after recovery. Diagnostic agreement between the two instruments for any disorder was fair (kappa = 0.38). Kappas for the personality disorder clusters ranged from 0.08 to 0.83. Kappas for individual personality disorders ranged from 0.18 for paranoid disorder to 0.62 for borderline disorder. While the depressive state did not consistently affect categorical diagnoses, dimensional scores tended to be higher when patients were depressed. A dimensional profile, in which scores on each disorder are generated for subjects, may be more reliable than categorical diagnoses derived from the same instrument.",
keywords = "depression, Personality disorder, structured interview",
author = "Michael O'Boyle and David Self",
year = "1990",
doi = "10.1016/0165-1781(90)90138-U",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "85--92",
journal = "Psychiatry Research",
issn = "0165-1781",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of two interviews for DSM-III-R personality disorders

AU - O'Boyle, Michael

AU - Self, David

PY - 1990

Y1 - 1990

N2 - The study examined agreement between personality disorder diagnoses obtained using two structured interviews and the effect of depression on the diagnoses obtained. Twenty subjects were interviewed while depressed, using the Personality Disorder Examination and the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R Personality Disorder; both interviews are designed to yield DSM-III-R personality disorder diagnoses. Eighteen subjects were reinterviewed later, 17 after recovery. Diagnostic agreement between the two instruments for any disorder was fair (kappa = 0.38). Kappas for the personality disorder clusters ranged from 0.08 to 0.83. Kappas for individual personality disorders ranged from 0.18 for paranoid disorder to 0.62 for borderline disorder. While the depressive state did not consistently affect categorical diagnoses, dimensional scores tended to be higher when patients were depressed. A dimensional profile, in which scores on each disorder are generated for subjects, may be more reliable than categorical diagnoses derived from the same instrument.

AB - The study examined agreement between personality disorder diagnoses obtained using two structured interviews and the effect of depression on the diagnoses obtained. Twenty subjects were interviewed while depressed, using the Personality Disorder Examination and the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R Personality Disorder; both interviews are designed to yield DSM-III-R personality disorder diagnoses. Eighteen subjects were reinterviewed later, 17 after recovery. Diagnostic agreement between the two instruments for any disorder was fair (kappa = 0.38). Kappas for the personality disorder clusters ranged from 0.08 to 0.83. Kappas for individual personality disorders ranged from 0.18 for paranoid disorder to 0.62 for borderline disorder. While the depressive state did not consistently affect categorical diagnoses, dimensional scores tended to be higher when patients were depressed. A dimensional profile, in which scores on each disorder are generated for subjects, may be more reliable than categorical diagnoses derived from the same instrument.

KW - depression

KW - Personality disorder

KW - structured interview

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025357038&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025357038&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0165-1781(90)90138-U

DO - 10.1016/0165-1781(90)90138-U

M3 - Article

C2 - 2349313

AN - SCOPUS:0025357038

VL - 32

SP - 85

EP - 92

JO - Psychiatry Research

JF - Psychiatry Research

SN - 0165-1781

IS - 1

ER -