A Concept Analysis of Systems Thinking

Ann M. Stalter, Janet M. Phillips, Jeanne S. Ruggiero, Debra L. Scardaville, Deborah Merriam, Mary A. Dolansky, Karen A. Goldschmidt, Carol Wiggs, Sherri Winegardner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: This concept analysis, written by the National Quality and Safety Education for Nurses (QSEN) RN-BSN Task Force, defines systems thinking in relation to healthcare delivery. METHODS: A review of the literature was conducted using five databases with the keywords “systems thinking” as well as “nursing education,” “nursing curriculum,” “online,” “capstone,” “practicum,” “RN-BSN/RN to BSN,” “healthcare organizations,” “hospitals,” and “clinical agencies.” Only articles that focused on systems thinking in health care were used. The authors identified defining attributes, antecedents, consequences, and empirical referents of systems thinking. FINDINGS: Systems thinking was defined as a process applied to individuals, teams, and organizations to impact cause and effect where solutions to complex problems are accomplished through collaborative effort according to personal ability with respect to improving components and the greater whole. Four primary attributes characterized systems thinking: dynamic system, holistic perspective, pattern identification, and transformation. CONCLUSION: Using the platform provided in this concept analysis, interprofessional practice has the ability to embrace planned efforts to improve critically needed quality and safety initiatives across patients’ lifespans and all healthcare settings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)323-330
Number of pages8
JournalNursing Forum
Volume52
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2017

Fingerprint

Systems Analysis
Delivery of Health Care
Organizations
Safety
Nursing Education
Advisory Committees
Curriculum
Nursing
Nurses
Databases
Education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Stalter, A. M., Phillips, J. M., Ruggiero, J. S., Scardaville, D. L., Merriam, D., Dolansky, M. A., ... Winegardner, S. (2017). A Concept Analysis of Systems Thinking. Nursing Forum, 52(4), 323-330. https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12196

A Concept Analysis of Systems Thinking. / Stalter, Ann M.; Phillips, Janet M.; Ruggiero, Jeanne S.; Scardaville, Debra L.; Merriam, Deborah; Dolansky, Mary A.; Goldschmidt, Karen A.; Wiggs, Carol; Winegardner, Sherri.

In: Nursing Forum, Vol. 52, No. 4, 01.10.2017, p. 323-330.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Stalter, AM, Phillips, JM, Ruggiero, JS, Scardaville, DL, Merriam, D, Dolansky, MA, Goldschmidt, KA, Wiggs, C & Winegardner, S 2017, 'A Concept Analysis of Systems Thinking', Nursing Forum, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 323-330. https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12196
Stalter AM, Phillips JM, Ruggiero JS, Scardaville DL, Merriam D, Dolansky MA et al. A Concept Analysis of Systems Thinking. Nursing Forum. 2017 Oct 1;52(4):323-330. https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12196
Stalter, Ann M. ; Phillips, Janet M. ; Ruggiero, Jeanne S. ; Scardaville, Debra L. ; Merriam, Deborah ; Dolansky, Mary A. ; Goldschmidt, Karen A. ; Wiggs, Carol ; Winegardner, Sherri. / A Concept Analysis of Systems Thinking. In: Nursing Forum. 2017 ; Vol. 52, No. 4. pp. 323-330.
@article{33a73081bfdc40539c8e117ad798f18a,
title = "A Concept Analysis of Systems Thinking",
abstract = "PURPOSE: This concept analysis, written by the National Quality and Safety Education for Nurses (QSEN) RN-BSN Task Force, defines systems thinking in relation to healthcare delivery. METHODS: A review of the literature was conducted using five databases with the keywords “systems thinking” as well as “nursing education,” “nursing curriculum,” “online,” “capstone,” “practicum,” “RN-BSN/RN to BSN,” “healthcare organizations,” “hospitals,” and “clinical agencies.” Only articles that focused on systems thinking in health care were used. The authors identified defining attributes, antecedents, consequences, and empirical referents of systems thinking. FINDINGS: Systems thinking was defined as a process applied to individuals, teams, and organizations to impact cause and effect where solutions to complex problems are accomplished through collaborative effort according to personal ability with respect to improving components and the greater whole. Four primary attributes characterized systems thinking: dynamic system, holistic perspective, pattern identification, and transformation. CONCLUSION: Using the platform provided in this concept analysis, interprofessional practice has the ability to embrace planned efforts to improve critically needed quality and safety initiatives across patients’ lifespans and all healthcare settings.",
author = "Stalter, {Ann M.} and Phillips, {Janet M.} and Ruggiero, {Jeanne S.} and Scardaville, {Debra L.} and Deborah Merriam and Dolansky, {Mary A.} and Goldschmidt, {Karen A.} and Carol Wiggs and Sherri Winegardner",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/nuf.12196",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "52",
pages = "323--330",
journal = "Nursing Forum",
issn = "0029-6473",
publisher = "Nursecom Publication",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Concept Analysis of Systems Thinking

AU - Stalter, Ann M.

AU - Phillips, Janet M.

AU - Ruggiero, Jeanne S.

AU - Scardaville, Debra L.

AU - Merriam, Deborah

AU - Dolansky, Mary A.

AU - Goldschmidt, Karen A.

AU - Wiggs, Carol

AU - Winegardner, Sherri

PY - 2017/10/1

Y1 - 2017/10/1

N2 - PURPOSE: This concept analysis, written by the National Quality and Safety Education for Nurses (QSEN) RN-BSN Task Force, defines systems thinking in relation to healthcare delivery. METHODS: A review of the literature was conducted using five databases with the keywords “systems thinking” as well as “nursing education,” “nursing curriculum,” “online,” “capstone,” “practicum,” “RN-BSN/RN to BSN,” “healthcare organizations,” “hospitals,” and “clinical agencies.” Only articles that focused on systems thinking in health care were used. The authors identified defining attributes, antecedents, consequences, and empirical referents of systems thinking. FINDINGS: Systems thinking was defined as a process applied to individuals, teams, and organizations to impact cause and effect where solutions to complex problems are accomplished through collaborative effort according to personal ability with respect to improving components and the greater whole. Four primary attributes characterized systems thinking: dynamic system, holistic perspective, pattern identification, and transformation. CONCLUSION: Using the platform provided in this concept analysis, interprofessional practice has the ability to embrace planned efforts to improve critically needed quality and safety initiatives across patients’ lifespans and all healthcare settings.

AB - PURPOSE: This concept analysis, written by the National Quality and Safety Education for Nurses (QSEN) RN-BSN Task Force, defines systems thinking in relation to healthcare delivery. METHODS: A review of the literature was conducted using five databases with the keywords “systems thinking” as well as “nursing education,” “nursing curriculum,” “online,” “capstone,” “practicum,” “RN-BSN/RN to BSN,” “healthcare organizations,” “hospitals,” and “clinical agencies.” Only articles that focused on systems thinking in health care were used. The authors identified defining attributes, antecedents, consequences, and empirical referents of systems thinking. FINDINGS: Systems thinking was defined as a process applied to individuals, teams, and organizations to impact cause and effect where solutions to complex problems are accomplished through collaborative effort according to personal ability with respect to improving components and the greater whole. Four primary attributes characterized systems thinking: dynamic system, holistic perspective, pattern identification, and transformation. CONCLUSION: Using the platform provided in this concept analysis, interprofessional practice has the ability to embrace planned efforts to improve critically needed quality and safety initiatives across patients’ lifespans and all healthcare settings.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85028921492&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85028921492&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/nuf.12196

DO - 10.1111/nuf.12196

M3 - Article

C2 - 28000925

AN - SCOPUS:85028921492

VL - 52

SP - 323

EP - 330

JO - Nursing Forum

JF - Nursing Forum

SN - 0029-6473

IS - 4

ER -