A critical review of racial/ethnic variables in osteoporosis and bone density research

M. S. Megyesi, L. M. Hunt, H. Brody

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Summary Racial and ethnic variables are common in research on variation in bone density. This literature review describes some of the common flaws associated with the use of these variables and provides some suggestions for how bone density research may be able to better document and address skeletal health disparities. Introduction Racial/ethnic differences in bone density have been commonly documented in the research literature. While effective identification of the specific factors underlying these trends might go a long way in informing treatment and screening for osteoporosis, this would require careful consideration of exactly what these variables are capturing. However, the basis and implications of what racial/ethnic variables represent have not carefully been examined in bone density research. Methods For this paper, we systematically reviewed 55 articles that included bone density and race/ethnicity as key variables. Our analysis reveals that racial/ethnic terminology in these articles is highly variable, and discussion of how race/ethnicity is determined is often vague and idiosyncratic. Racial/ethnic variables are being used for a wide range of analytical purposes in statistical tests, which may not be appropriate for such a complex and poorly defined variable. Results Many articles attribute racial/ethnic differences in bone mass/bone density to genetic causes, although few studies actually examine genetic data. Conclusion This analysis indicates that more rigorous examination of what race/ethnicity actually captures, more careful definitions of group labels and the procedures for assigning them, and attention to the limitations of how such variables can reliably be used in data analyses is needed to help address the problems and issues outlined in this review.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1669-1679
Number of pages11
JournalOsteoporosis International
Volume22
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2011

Fingerprint

Bone Density
Osteoporosis
Research
Terminology
Bone and Bones
Health

Keywords

  • Bone density
  • Ethnicity
  • Health disparities
  • Osteoporosis
  • Race

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

Cite this

A critical review of racial/ethnic variables in osteoporosis and bone density research. / Megyesi, M. S.; Hunt, L. M.; Brody, H.

In: Osteoporosis International, Vol. 22, No. 6, 06.2011, p. 1669-1679.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Megyesi, M. S. ; Hunt, L. M. ; Brody, H. / A critical review of racial/ethnic variables in osteoporosis and bone density research. In: Osteoporosis International. 2011 ; Vol. 22, No. 6. pp. 1669-1679.
@article{1183db17ac104325b81aae15253ae5f7,
title = "A critical review of racial/ethnic variables in osteoporosis and bone density research",
abstract = "Summary Racial and ethnic variables are common in research on variation in bone density. This literature review describes some of the common flaws associated with the use of these variables and provides some suggestions for how bone density research may be able to better document and address skeletal health disparities. Introduction Racial/ethnic differences in bone density have been commonly documented in the research literature. While effective identification of the specific factors underlying these trends might go a long way in informing treatment and screening for osteoporosis, this would require careful consideration of exactly what these variables are capturing. However, the basis and implications of what racial/ethnic variables represent have not carefully been examined in bone density research. Methods For this paper, we systematically reviewed 55 articles that included bone density and race/ethnicity as key variables. Our analysis reveals that racial/ethnic terminology in these articles is highly variable, and discussion of how race/ethnicity is determined is often vague and idiosyncratic. Racial/ethnic variables are being used for a wide range of analytical purposes in statistical tests, which may not be appropriate for such a complex and poorly defined variable. Results Many articles attribute racial/ethnic differences in bone mass/bone density to genetic causes, although few studies actually examine genetic data. Conclusion This analysis indicates that more rigorous examination of what race/ethnicity actually captures, more careful definitions of group labels and the procedures for assigning them, and attention to the limitations of how such variables can reliably be used in data analyses is needed to help address the problems and issues outlined in this review.",
keywords = "Bone density, Ethnicity, Health disparities, Osteoporosis, Race",
author = "Megyesi, {M. S.} and Hunt, {L. M.} and H. Brody",
year = "2011",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1007/s00198-010-1503-z",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "1669--1679",
journal = "Osteoporosis International",
issn = "0937-941X",
publisher = "Springer London",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A critical review of racial/ethnic variables in osteoporosis and bone density research

AU - Megyesi, M. S.

AU - Hunt, L. M.

AU - Brody, H.

PY - 2011/6

Y1 - 2011/6

N2 - Summary Racial and ethnic variables are common in research on variation in bone density. This literature review describes some of the common flaws associated with the use of these variables and provides some suggestions for how bone density research may be able to better document and address skeletal health disparities. Introduction Racial/ethnic differences in bone density have been commonly documented in the research literature. While effective identification of the specific factors underlying these trends might go a long way in informing treatment and screening for osteoporosis, this would require careful consideration of exactly what these variables are capturing. However, the basis and implications of what racial/ethnic variables represent have not carefully been examined in bone density research. Methods For this paper, we systematically reviewed 55 articles that included bone density and race/ethnicity as key variables. Our analysis reveals that racial/ethnic terminology in these articles is highly variable, and discussion of how race/ethnicity is determined is often vague and idiosyncratic. Racial/ethnic variables are being used for a wide range of analytical purposes in statistical tests, which may not be appropriate for such a complex and poorly defined variable. Results Many articles attribute racial/ethnic differences in bone mass/bone density to genetic causes, although few studies actually examine genetic data. Conclusion This analysis indicates that more rigorous examination of what race/ethnicity actually captures, more careful definitions of group labels and the procedures for assigning them, and attention to the limitations of how such variables can reliably be used in data analyses is needed to help address the problems and issues outlined in this review.

AB - Summary Racial and ethnic variables are common in research on variation in bone density. This literature review describes some of the common flaws associated with the use of these variables and provides some suggestions for how bone density research may be able to better document and address skeletal health disparities. Introduction Racial/ethnic differences in bone density have been commonly documented in the research literature. While effective identification of the specific factors underlying these trends might go a long way in informing treatment and screening for osteoporosis, this would require careful consideration of exactly what these variables are capturing. However, the basis and implications of what racial/ethnic variables represent have not carefully been examined in bone density research. Methods For this paper, we systematically reviewed 55 articles that included bone density and race/ethnicity as key variables. Our analysis reveals that racial/ethnic terminology in these articles is highly variable, and discussion of how race/ethnicity is determined is often vague and idiosyncratic. Racial/ethnic variables are being used for a wide range of analytical purposes in statistical tests, which may not be appropriate for such a complex and poorly defined variable. Results Many articles attribute racial/ethnic differences in bone mass/bone density to genetic causes, although few studies actually examine genetic data. Conclusion This analysis indicates that more rigorous examination of what race/ethnicity actually captures, more careful definitions of group labels and the procedures for assigning them, and attention to the limitations of how such variables can reliably be used in data analyses is needed to help address the problems and issues outlined in this review.

KW - Bone density

KW - Ethnicity

KW - Health disparities

KW - Osteoporosis

KW - Race

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79959974448&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79959974448&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00198-010-1503-z

DO - 10.1007/s00198-010-1503-z

M3 - Article

C2 - 21207012

AN - SCOPUS:79959974448

VL - 22

SP - 1669

EP - 1679

JO - Osteoporosis International

JF - Osteoporosis International

SN - 0937-941X

IS - 6

ER -