A critique of clinical equipoise

Therapeutic misconception in the ethics of clinical trials

Howard Brody

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

This chapter explores the theoretical and practical problems associated with the similarity position and its logical offspring, clinical equipoise. It first considers the therapeutic misconception in the ethics of clinical trials before turning to the ethical distinction between research and therapy. It then turns to Charles Fried's arguments regarding the similarity position within bioethics, with particular emphasis on his assertion that answers to ethical dilemmas in research would have to be found within the ethics of therapeutic medicine. It also looks at the emergence of clinical equipoise as a doctrine in research ethics, along with the divorce between theory and practice as exemplified by placebo-controlled trials. The chapter concludes by launching a critique of the similarity position and clinical equipoise and calling for an alternative framework for the ethics ofclinical trials.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationThe Ethical Challenges of Human Research: Selected Essays
PublisherOxford University Press
ISBN (Print)9780190267681, 9780199896202
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 15 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Misconceptions
Therapeutics
Clinical Trials
Logic
Research Ethics
Placebo
Medicine
Therapy
Doctrine
Bioethics
Controlled
Ethical Dilemmas
Offspring
Divorce

Keywords

  • Bioethics
  • Charles fried
  • Clinical equipoise
  • Clinical trials
  • Placebo-controlled trials
  • Research
  • Research ethics
  • Similarity position
  • Therapeutic medicine
  • Therapy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities(all)

Cite this

Brody, H. (2012). A critique of clinical equipoise: Therapeutic misconception in the ethics of clinical trials. In The Ethical Challenges of Human Research: Selected Essays Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199896202.003.0015

A critique of clinical equipoise : Therapeutic misconception in the ethics of clinical trials. / Brody, Howard.

The Ethical Challenges of Human Research: Selected Essays. Oxford University Press, 2012.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Brody, H 2012, A critique of clinical equipoise: Therapeutic misconception in the ethics of clinical trials. in The Ethical Challenges of Human Research: Selected Essays. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199896202.003.0015
Brody H. A critique of clinical equipoise: Therapeutic misconception in the ethics of clinical trials. In The Ethical Challenges of Human Research: Selected Essays. Oxford University Press. 2012 https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199896202.003.0015
Brody, Howard. / A critique of clinical equipoise : Therapeutic misconception in the ethics of clinical trials. The Ethical Challenges of Human Research: Selected Essays. Oxford University Press, 2012.
@inbook{e9d9b9371d1d43edb65631da7963997c,
title = "A critique of clinical equipoise: Therapeutic misconception in the ethics of clinical trials",
abstract = "This chapter explores the theoretical and practical problems associated with the similarity position and its logical offspring, clinical equipoise. It first considers the therapeutic misconception in the ethics of clinical trials before turning to the ethical distinction between research and therapy. It then turns to Charles Fried's arguments regarding the similarity position within bioethics, with particular emphasis on his assertion that answers to ethical dilemmas in research would have to be found within the ethics of therapeutic medicine. It also looks at the emergence of clinical equipoise as a doctrine in research ethics, along with the divorce between theory and practice as exemplified by placebo-controlled trials. The chapter concludes by launching a critique of the similarity position and clinical equipoise and calling for an alternative framework for the ethics ofclinical trials.",
keywords = "Bioethics, Charles fried, Clinical equipoise, Clinical trials, Placebo-controlled trials, Research, Research ethics, Similarity position, Therapeutic medicine, Therapy",
author = "Howard Brody",
year = "2012",
month = "11",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199896202.003.0015",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780190267681",
booktitle = "The Ethical Challenges of Human Research: Selected Essays",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - A critique of clinical equipoise

T2 - Therapeutic misconception in the ethics of clinical trials

AU - Brody, Howard

PY - 2012/11/15

Y1 - 2012/11/15

N2 - This chapter explores the theoretical and practical problems associated with the similarity position and its logical offspring, clinical equipoise. It first considers the therapeutic misconception in the ethics of clinical trials before turning to the ethical distinction between research and therapy. It then turns to Charles Fried's arguments regarding the similarity position within bioethics, with particular emphasis on his assertion that answers to ethical dilemmas in research would have to be found within the ethics of therapeutic medicine. It also looks at the emergence of clinical equipoise as a doctrine in research ethics, along with the divorce between theory and practice as exemplified by placebo-controlled trials. The chapter concludes by launching a critique of the similarity position and clinical equipoise and calling for an alternative framework for the ethics ofclinical trials.

AB - This chapter explores the theoretical and practical problems associated with the similarity position and its logical offspring, clinical equipoise. It first considers the therapeutic misconception in the ethics of clinical trials before turning to the ethical distinction between research and therapy. It then turns to Charles Fried's arguments regarding the similarity position within bioethics, with particular emphasis on his assertion that answers to ethical dilemmas in research would have to be found within the ethics of therapeutic medicine. It also looks at the emergence of clinical equipoise as a doctrine in research ethics, along with the divorce between theory and practice as exemplified by placebo-controlled trials. The chapter concludes by launching a critique of the similarity position and clinical equipoise and calling for an alternative framework for the ethics ofclinical trials.

KW - Bioethics

KW - Charles fried

KW - Clinical equipoise

KW - Clinical trials

KW - Placebo-controlled trials

KW - Research

KW - Research ethics

KW - Similarity position

KW - Therapeutic medicine

KW - Therapy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84938629523&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84938629523&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199896202.003.0015

DO - 10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199896202.003.0015

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780190267681

SN - 9780199896202

BT - The Ethical Challenges of Human Research: Selected Essays

PB - Oxford University Press

ER -