A factor analytic comparison of four learning-styles instruments

Barbara G. Ferrell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

45 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Four learning-styles instruments, differing in form, length, language, and conceptualization of learning style (the Grasha-Riechmann Student Learning Style Scales, Kolb Learning Styles Inventory, Dunn Learning Style Inventory, and Johnson Decision Making Inventory) were administered to 471 high school and community college students. The results of factor analysis were compared to the conceptualization of learning style as outlined by each of the authors of the tests. Factors were compared to types of behaviors outlined in the literature by J. W. Keefe (1979) as comprising learning style, and factors derived from each instrument were compared to those derived from the others in order to determine overlap in factors. Results contribute to the validation of only 1 of the 4 conceptualizations of learning style. All 4 instruments measured behaviors outlined by 1 conceptualization in the literature to comprise learning style, but none of the instruments measured all types of behaviors. Some overlap of factors did exist among the 4 instruments, but the instruments were clearly not measuring the same thing. (12 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)33-39
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Educational Psychology
Volume75
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1983

Fingerprint

Learning
learning
Equipment and Supplies
Students
Statistical Factor Analysis
factor analysis
Decision Making
Language
student
decision making
language
school
community

Keywords

  • factor analysis, 4 learning style measures, high school & community college students

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

A factor analytic comparison of four learning-styles instruments. / Ferrell, Barbara G.

In: Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 75, No. 1, 02.1983, p. 33-39.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{39ce443fb0ef4032938fb8b5e376eeb7,
title = "A factor analytic comparison of four learning-styles instruments",
abstract = "Four learning-styles instruments, differing in form, length, language, and conceptualization of learning style (the Grasha-Riechmann Student Learning Style Scales, Kolb Learning Styles Inventory, Dunn Learning Style Inventory, and Johnson Decision Making Inventory) were administered to 471 high school and community college students. The results of factor analysis were compared to the conceptualization of learning style as outlined by each of the authors of the tests. Factors were compared to types of behaviors outlined in the literature by J. W. Keefe (1979) as comprising learning style, and factors derived from each instrument were compared to those derived from the others in order to determine overlap in factors. Results contribute to the validation of only 1 of the 4 conceptualizations of learning style. All 4 instruments measured behaviors outlined by 1 conceptualization in the literature to comprise learning style, but none of the instruments measured all types of behaviors. Some overlap of factors did exist among the 4 instruments, but the instruments were clearly not measuring the same thing. (12 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).",
keywords = "factor analysis, 4 learning style measures, high school & community college students",
author = "Ferrell, {Barbara G.}",
year = "1983",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1037/0022-0663.75.1.33",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "75",
pages = "33--39",
journal = "Journal of Educational Psychology",
issn = "0022-0663",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A factor analytic comparison of four learning-styles instruments

AU - Ferrell, Barbara G.

PY - 1983/2

Y1 - 1983/2

N2 - Four learning-styles instruments, differing in form, length, language, and conceptualization of learning style (the Grasha-Riechmann Student Learning Style Scales, Kolb Learning Styles Inventory, Dunn Learning Style Inventory, and Johnson Decision Making Inventory) were administered to 471 high school and community college students. The results of factor analysis were compared to the conceptualization of learning style as outlined by each of the authors of the tests. Factors were compared to types of behaviors outlined in the literature by J. W. Keefe (1979) as comprising learning style, and factors derived from each instrument were compared to those derived from the others in order to determine overlap in factors. Results contribute to the validation of only 1 of the 4 conceptualizations of learning style. All 4 instruments measured behaviors outlined by 1 conceptualization in the literature to comprise learning style, but none of the instruments measured all types of behaviors. Some overlap of factors did exist among the 4 instruments, but the instruments were clearly not measuring the same thing. (12 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

AB - Four learning-styles instruments, differing in form, length, language, and conceptualization of learning style (the Grasha-Riechmann Student Learning Style Scales, Kolb Learning Styles Inventory, Dunn Learning Style Inventory, and Johnson Decision Making Inventory) were administered to 471 high school and community college students. The results of factor analysis were compared to the conceptualization of learning style as outlined by each of the authors of the tests. Factors were compared to types of behaviors outlined in the literature by J. W. Keefe (1979) as comprising learning style, and factors derived from each instrument were compared to those derived from the others in order to determine overlap in factors. Results contribute to the validation of only 1 of the 4 conceptualizations of learning style. All 4 instruments measured behaviors outlined by 1 conceptualization in the literature to comprise learning style, but none of the instruments measured all types of behaviors. Some overlap of factors did exist among the 4 instruments, but the instruments were clearly not measuring the same thing. (12 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

KW - factor analysis, 4 learning style measures, high school & community college students

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0038294526&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0038294526&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0022-0663.75.1.33

DO - 10.1037/0022-0663.75.1.33

M3 - Article

VL - 75

SP - 33

EP - 39

JO - Journal of Educational Psychology

JF - Journal of Educational Psychology

SN - 0022-0663

IS - 1

ER -