A Hybrid Type III Analysis of a Filmed Story-Telling Intervention’s Impact on Provider Stigma

Sally Wasmuth, Johnna Belkiewitz, Edward Miech, Chih Ying Li, Alex Harris, Jocelyne Hernandez, Caitlin Horsford, Carlton Smith, Dawn Bravata

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Identity Development Evolution and Sharing (IDEAS) reduces provider stigma, but few have been trained to implement IDEAS, highlighting a need for implementation strategies that facilitate uptake. We evaluated whether external facilitation successfully supported IDEAS implementation and whether IDEAS reduced provider stigma within and across sites irrespective of implementation barriers and facilitators. Key informants from 10 sites completed interviews and surveys of appropriateness, acceptability, and feasibility. Interviews were analyzed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research guidelines. Intervention effectiveness was measured via paired t tests of pre-/post-quantitative data on provider stigma completed by practitioners who attended the training. Ten sites successfully implemented IDEAS via external facilitation; 58 practitioners from nine sites completed pre- and post-surveys. Data showed significant decreases in stigma after the intervention. IDEAS, supported by external facilitation, is a feasible, acceptable, and appropriate means of reducing stigma among occupational therapy practitioners.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalOTJR: Occupational Therapy Journal of Research
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2024

Keywords

  • Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research
  • diversity training
  • external facilitation
  • healthcare equity
  • implementation climate
  • influencing factors
  • occupational therapy
  • stigma-reduction
  • theater-based interventions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Occupational Therapy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Hybrid Type III Analysis of a Filmed Story-Telling Intervention’s Impact on Provider Stigma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this