Skip to main navigation
Skip to search
Skip to main content
UTMB Health Research Expert Profiles Home
Help & FAQ
Home
Experts
Departments
Equipment
Projects/Grants
Publications
Activities
Press/Media
Honors
Impacts
Search by expertise, name or affiliation
A mechanical comparison of the dynamic compression plate, limited contact-dynamic compression plate, and point contact fixator
T. Miclau
, A. Remiger
, S. Tepic
,
R. Lindsey
, T. McIff
Research output
:
Contribution to journal
›
Article
›
peer-review
75
Scopus citations
Overview
Fingerprint
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A mechanical comparison of the dynamic compression plate, limited contact-dynamic compression plate, and point contact fixator'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Sort by
Weight
Alphabetically
Keyphrases
Fixator
100%
Mechanical Comparison
100%
Dynamic Compression Plate
100%
Compression Point
100%
Limited Contact Dynamic Compression Plate
100%
Point Contact
100%
No Significant Difference
40%
Cortical Bone
20%
Four-point Bending
20%
Tibia
20%
Cadaveric
20%
Transverse Fracture
20%
Sheep Tibia
20%
Average Torque
20%
Plate Dynamics
20%
Bending Stiffness
20%
Fixation Characteristics
20%
Diaphyseal Fracture
20%
Torsion Properties
20%
Bending Properties
20%
Torsion Test
20%
Bone Vascularization
20%
Gap Opening
20%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine
Dynamic Compression Plate
100%
Limited Contact Dynamic Compression Plate
100%
Tibia
40%
Vascularity
20%
Cortical Bone
20%
Engineering
Contact Point
100%
Contact Dynamics
100%
Bending Stiffness
20%
Torsion Testing
20%
Point Bending
20%