A meta-analysis of applied vestibular stimulation research

Kenneth Ottenbacher, Paul Petersen

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

The results of studies examining the effectiveness of vestibular stimulation as a form of sensory stimulation were reviewed. The review employed recently developed quantitative methods that treat the literature review process as a unique type of research. Forty-one studies were located that employed some form of vestibular stimulation as the independent variable. Eighteen of these studies met criteria consistent with traditionally accepted standards of empirical inquiry in the behavioral and biomedical sciences and were included in the review. The 18 studies contained a total of 44 hypothesis tests that evaluated the efficacy of vestibular stimulation as a form of sensory enrichment designed to facilitate various developmental parameters. An analysis of the resultsof these tests, using methods of meta-analysis, revealedthat subjects receiving vestibular stimulation performedsignificantly better than members of control or comparison groups who did not receive such stimulation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationVestibular Processing Dysfunction in Children
PublisherTaylor and Francis
Pages119-134
Number of pages16
ISBN (Electronic)9781135023102
ISBN (Print)0866564314, 9780866564311
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Meta-Analysis
Behavioral Sciences
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Health Professions(all)

Cite this

Ottenbacher, K., & Petersen, P. (2013). A meta-analysis of applied vestibular stimulation research. In Vestibular Processing Dysfunction in Children (pp. 119-134). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203708170

A meta-analysis of applied vestibular stimulation research. / Ottenbacher, Kenneth; Petersen, Paul.

Vestibular Processing Dysfunction in Children. Taylor and Francis, 2013. p. 119-134.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Ottenbacher, K & Petersen, P 2013, A meta-analysis of applied vestibular stimulation research. in Vestibular Processing Dysfunction in Children. Taylor and Francis, pp. 119-134. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203708170
Ottenbacher K, Petersen P. A meta-analysis of applied vestibular stimulation research. In Vestibular Processing Dysfunction in Children. Taylor and Francis. 2013. p. 119-134 https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203708170
Ottenbacher, Kenneth ; Petersen, Paul. / A meta-analysis of applied vestibular stimulation research. Vestibular Processing Dysfunction in Children. Taylor and Francis, 2013. pp. 119-134
@inbook{78889ae9cd934c258663444f67f7e7e3,
title = "A meta-analysis of applied vestibular stimulation research",
abstract = "The results of studies examining the effectiveness of vestibular stimulation as a form of sensory stimulation were reviewed. The review employed recently developed quantitative methods that treat the literature review process as a unique type of research. Forty-one studies were located that employed some form of vestibular stimulation as the independent variable. Eighteen of these studies met criteria consistent with traditionally accepted standards of empirical inquiry in the behavioral and biomedical sciences and were included in the review. The 18 studies contained a total of 44 hypothesis tests that evaluated the efficacy of vestibular stimulation as a form of sensory enrichment designed to facilitate various developmental parameters. An analysis of the resultsof these tests, using methods of meta-analysis, revealedthat subjects receiving vestibular stimulation performedsignificantly better than members of control or comparison groups who did not receive such stimulation.",
author = "Kenneth Ottenbacher and Paul Petersen",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4324/9780203708170",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "0866564314",
pages = "119--134",
booktitle = "Vestibular Processing Dysfunction in Children",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - A meta-analysis of applied vestibular stimulation research

AU - Ottenbacher, Kenneth

AU - Petersen, Paul

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

N2 - The results of studies examining the effectiveness of vestibular stimulation as a form of sensory stimulation were reviewed. The review employed recently developed quantitative methods that treat the literature review process as a unique type of research. Forty-one studies were located that employed some form of vestibular stimulation as the independent variable. Eighteen of these studies met criteria consistent with traditionally accepted standards of empirical inquiry in the behavioral and biomedical sciences and were included in the review. The 18 studies contained a total of 44 hypothesis tests that evaluated the efficacy of vestibular stimulation as a form of sensory enrichment designed to facilitate various developmental parameters. An analysis of the resultsof these tests, using methods of meta-analysis, revealedthat subjects receiving vestibular stimulation performedsignificantly better than members of control or comparison groups who did not receive such stimulation.

AB - The results of studies examining the effectiveness of vestibular stimulation as a form of sensory stimulation were reviewed. The review employed recently developed quantitative methods that treat the literature review process as a unique type of research. Forty-one studies were located that employed some form of vestibular stimulation as the independent variable. Eighteen of these studies met criteria consistent with traditionally accepted standards of empirical inquiry in the behavioral and biomedical sciences and were included in the review. The 18 studies contained a total of 44 hypothesis tests that evaluated the efficacy of vestibular stimulation as a form of sensory enrichment designed to facilitate various developmental parameters. An analysis of the resultsof these tests, using methods of meta-analysis, revealedthat subjects receiving vestibular stimulation performedsignificantly better than members of control or comparison groups who did not receive such stimulation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067504421&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067504421&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4324/9780203708170

DO - 10.4324/9780203708170

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85067504421

SN - 0866564314

SN - 9780866564311

SP - 119

EP - 134

BT - Vestibular Processing Dysfunction in Children

PB - Taylor and Francis

ER -