A method for proficiency testing of small peer groups in the College of American Pathologists Coagulation Surveys

Mark T. Cunningham, Jens Praestgaard, Patricia E. Styer, John T. Brandt, Robert B. Fairweather, Michael Laposata, John D. Olson, Randy C. Sosolik, Douglas A. Triplett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. - To develop a grading scheme for the proficiency testing of small peer groups of fewer than 10 members for the prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT). Methods. - A modified target value for small peer groups was derived based on the assumption that measurement variability in the PT and APTT is more greatly influenced by variations in reagents than in instruments. Criteria for grading were established by statistical simulation to achieve misclassification errors of less than 5% for both incorrectly passing and failing participants. College of American Pathologists Coagulation Survey data were analyzed to determine the number of additional laboratories graded using the proposed scheme, as well as the failure rates among participants in the small peer groups. Results. - The modified target value for small peer groups is a weighted average between the mean of the peer group and the mean of all participants using the same reagent (reagent group). Peer groups with as few as 4 members can be graded provided that specific criteria are satisfied: there must be at least 5 peer groups for the same reagent, at least 3 of these 5 peer groups must have more than 3 members, and the coefficient of variation for the reagent group must be less than 10%. This proposed grading scheme decreased the number of ungraded laboratories by 44% to 46% for the PT and 42% to 55% for the APTT. The percentage of failing grades among participants in the small peer groups ranged from 1.3% to 4.1% for the PT and 1.4% to 7.2% for the APTT. These failure rates were 2.8- to 13.0-fold higher than the failure rates in large peer groups (P ≤ .05). Conclusions. - The proposed small peer group grading scheme can improve the effectiveness of College of American Pathologists proficiency testing for the PT and APTT and may also be generally applicable to other test methods and analytes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)199-205
Number of pages7
JournalArchives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
Volume123
Issue number3
StatePublished - 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Peer Group
Partial Thromboplastin Time
Prothrombin Time
Surveys and Questionnaires
Pathologists

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Medical Laboratory Technology

Cite this

Cunningham, M. T., Praestgaard, J., Styer, P. E., Brandt, J. T., Fairweather, R. B., Laposata, M., ... Triplett, D. A. (1999). A method for proficiency testing of small peer groups in the College of American Pathologists Coagulation Surveys. Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 123(3), 199-205.

A method for proficiency testing of small peer groups in the College of American Pathologists Coagulation Surveys. / Cunningham, Mark T.; Praestgaard, Jens; Styer, Patricia E.; Brandt, John T.; Fairweather, Robert B.; Laposata, Michael; Olson, John D.; Sosolik, Randy C.; Triplett, Douglas A.

In: Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vol. 123, No. 3, 1999, p. 199-205.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cunningham, MT, Praestgaard, J, Styer, PE, Brandt, JT, Fairweather, RB, Laposata, M, Olson, JD, Sosolik, RC & Triplett, DA 1999, 'A method for proficiency testing of small peer groups in the College of American Pathologists Coagulation Surveys', Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, vol. 123, no. 3, pp. 199-205.
Cunningham, Mark T. ; Praestgaard, Jens ; Styer, Patricia E. ; Brandt, John T. ; Fairweather, Robert B. ; Laposata, Michael ; Olson, John D. ; Sosolik, Randy C. ; Triplett, Douglas A. / A method for proficiency testing of small peer groups in the College of American Pathologists Coagulation Surveys. In: Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine. 1999 ; Vol. 123, No. 3. pp. 199-205.
@article{e7f28b956b654873bae6e497a7567b50,
title = "A method for proficiency testing of small peer groups in the College of American Pathologists Coagulation Surveys",
abstract = "Objective. - To develop a grading scheme for the proficiency testing of small peer groups of fewer than 10 members for the prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT). Methods. - A modified target value for small peer groups was derived based on the assumption that measurement variability in the PT and APTT is more greatly influenced by variations in reagents than in instruments. Criteria for grading were established by statistical simulation to achieve misclassification errors of less than 5{\%} for both incorrectly passing and failing participants. College of American Pathologists Coagulation Survey data were analyzed to determine the number of additional laboratories graded using the proposed scheme, as well as the failure rates among participants in the small peer groups. Results. - The modified target value for small peer groups is a weighted average between the mean of the peer group and the mean of all participants using the same reagent (reagent group). Peer groups with as few as 4 members can be graded provided that specific criteria are satisfied: there must be at least 5 peer groups for the same reagent, at least 3 of these 5 peer groups must have more than 3 members, and the coefficient of variation for the reagent group must be less than 10{\%}. This proposed grading scheme decreased the number of ungraded laboratories by 44{\%} to 46{\%} for the PT and 42{\%} to 55{\%} for the APTT. The percentage of failing grades among participants in the small peer groups ranged from 1.3{\%} to 4.1{\%} for the PT and 1.4{\%} to 7.2{\%} for the APTT. These failure rates were 2.8- to 13.0-fold higher than the failure rates in large peer groups (P ≤ .05). Conclusions. - The proposed small peer group grading scheme can improve the effectiveness of College of American Pathologists proficiency testing for the PT and APTT and may also be generally applicable to other test methods and analytes.",
author = "Cunningham, {Mark T.} and Jens Praestgaard and Styer, {Patricia E.} and Brandt, {John T.} and Fairweather, {Robert B.} and Michael Laposata and Olson, {John D.} and Sosolik, {Randy C.} and Triplett, {Douglas A.}",
year = "1999",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "123",
pages = "199--205",
journal = "Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine",
issn = "0003-9985",
publisher = "College of American Pathologists",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A method for proficiency testing of small peer groups in the College of American Pathologists Coagulation Surveys

AU - Cunningham, Mark T.

AU - Praestgaard, Jens

AU - Styer, Patricia E.

AU - Brandt, John T.

AU - Fairweather, Robert B.

AU - Laposata, Michael

AU - Olson, John D.

AU - Sosolik, Randy C.

AU - Triplett, Douglas A.

PY - 1999

Y1 - 1999

N2 - Objective. - To develop a grading scheme for the proficiency testing of small peer groups of fewer than 10 members for the prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT). Methods. - A modified target value for small peer groups was derived based on the assumption that measurement variability in the PT and APTT is more greatly influenced by variations in reagents than in instruments. Criteria for grading were established by statistical simulation to achieve misclassification errors of less than 5% for both incorrectly passing and failing participants. College of American Pathologists Coagulation Survey data were analyzed to determine the number of additional laboratories graded using the proposed scheme, as well as the failure rates among participants in the small peer groups. Results. - The modified target value for small peer groups is a weighted average between the mean of the peer group and the mean of all participants using the same reagent (reagent group). Peer groups with as few as 4 members can be graded provided that specific criteria are satisfied: there must be at least 5 peer groups for the same reagent, at least 3 of these 5 peer groups must have more than 3 members, and the coefficient of variation for the reagent group must be less than 10%. This proposed grading scheme decreased the number of ungraded laboratories by 44% to 46% for the PT and 42% to 55% for the APTT. The percentage of failing grades among participants in the small peer groups ranged from 1.3% to 4.1% for the PT and 1.4% to 7.2% for the APTT. These failure rates were 2.8- to 13.0-fold higher than the failure rates in large peer groups (P ≤ .05). Conclusions. - The proposed small peer group grading scheme can improve the effectiveness of College of American Pathologists proficiency testing for the PT and APTT and may also be generally applicable to other test methods and analytes.

AB - Objective. - To develop a grading scheme for the proficiency testing of small peer groups of fewer than 10 members for the prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT). Methods. - A modified target value for small peer groups was derived based on the assumption that measurement variability in the PT and APTT is more greatly influenced by variations in reagents than in instruments. Criteria for grading were established by statistical simulation to achieve misclassification errors of less than 5% for both incorrectly passing and failing participants. College of American Pathologists Coagulation Survey data were analyzed to determine the number of additional laboratories graded using the proposed scheme, as well as the failure rates among participants in the small peer groups. Results. - The modified target value for small peer groups is a weighted average between the mean of the peer group and the mean of all participants using the same reagent (reagent group). Peer groups with as few as 4 members can be graded provided that specific criteria are satisfied: there must be at least 5 peer groups for the same reagent, at least 3 of these 5 peer groups must have more than 3 members, and the coefficient of variation for the reagent group must be less than 10%. This proposed grading scheme decreased the number of ungraded laboratories by 44% to 46% for the PT and 42% to 55% for the APTT. The percentage of failing grades among participants in the small peer groups ranged from 1.3% to 4.1% for the PT and 1.4% to 7.2% for the APTT. These failure rates were 2.8- to 13.0-fold higher than the failure rates in large peer groups (P ≤ .05). Conclusions. - The proposed small peer group grading scheme can improve the effectiveness of College of American Pathologists proficiency testing for the PT and APTT and may also be generally applicable to other test methods and analytes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033018357&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033018357&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 10086507

AN - SCOPUS:0033018357

VL - 123

SP - 199

EP - 205

JO - Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine

JF - Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine

SN - 0003-9985

IS - 3

ER -