A minimally disruptive model and three-dimensional evaluation of lisfranc joint diastasis

Vinod Panchbhavi, Clark R. Andersen, Santaram Vallurupalli, Jinping Yang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: There is no model that can reproduce the diastasis at the Lisfranc joint after isolated transection of the Lisfranc ligament. Prior models required extensive sectioning of ligaments in the midfoot and represent injuries that cause extensive tarsometatarsal fracture-dislocations. They do not represent a subset of injuries that cause subtle or limited disruption at the Lisfranc joint. The purpose of this study was to create a model with the minimum amount of ligamentous disruption and loading necessary to consistently observe diastasis at the Lisfranc joint. Methods: Fourteen fresh-frozen paired cadaver feet were dissected to expose the dorsum. Three screws were inserted into each first cuneiform and second metatarsal to create a pair of registration triads. A digitizer was utilized to record the three-dimensional positions of the screws and their displacement under loaded and unloaded conditions before and after the Lisfranc ligament was cut (intact and cut conditions). The first and second cuneiforms and their metatarsals were removed, and the attachment sites of the dorsal and the Lisfranc ligament were digitized. The three-dimensional positions of the bones and ligament displacement were determined. The significance of differences between conditions was tested with analysis of variance, and linear regression analysis was used to test the correlation between dorsal and plantar displacements. Results: There was a significant difference, of 1.3mm, in themean displacement between the cut loaded and intact loaded conditions (p < 0.0001). A modest correlation (r2 = 0.60) was found between dorsal displacement and displacement at the site of the Lisfranc ligament, possibly attributable to rotations between the first cuneiform and second metatarsal. Conclusions: Isolated sectioning of the Lisfranc ligament is sufficient to consistently create diastasis at the Lisfranc joint. Dorsal displacements between the first cuneiform and second metatarsal are a modest predictor of plantar displacements. Clinical Relevance: This model can be used to compare different materials for or methods of fixation used to stabilize the Lisfranc joint, such as screws or sutures with endobuttons or ligament substitutes, in the future.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2707-2713
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series A
Volume90
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2008

Fingerprint

Ligaments
Joints
Metatarsal Bones
Wounds and Injuries
Cadaver
Sutures
Foot
Linear Models
Analysis of Variance
Regression Analysis
Bone and Bones

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

A minimally disruptive model and three-dimensional evaluation of lisfranc joint diastasis. / Panchbhavi, Vinod; Andersen, Clark R.; Vallurupalli, Santaram; Yang, Jinping.

In: Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series A, Vol. 90, No. 12, 01.12.2008, p. 2707-2713.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Panchbhavi, Vinod ; Andersen, Clark R. ; Vallurupalli, Santaram ; Yang, Jinping. / A minimally disruptive model and three-dimensional evaluation of lisfranc joint diastasis. In: Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series A. 2008 ; Vol. 90, No. 12. pp. 2707-2713.
@article{7770e94b5e0b4da2a7a5b8e5c14d1a50,
title = "A minimally disruptive model and three-dimensional evaluation of lisfranc joint diastasis",
abstract = "Background: There is no model that can reproduce the diastasis at the Lisfranc joint after isolated transection of the Lisfranc ligament. Prior models required extensive sectioning of ligaments in the midfoot and represent injuries that cause extensive tarsometatarsal fracture-dislocations. They do not represent a subset of injuries that cause subtle or limited disruption at the Lisfranc joint. The purpose of this study was to create a model with the minimum amount of ligamentous disruption and loading necessary to consistently observe diastasis at the Lisfranc joint. Methods: Fourteen fresh-frozen paired cadaver feet were dissected to expose the dorsum. Three screws were inserted into each first cuneiform and second metatarsal to create a pair of registration triads. A digitizer was utilized to record the three-dimensional positions of the screws and their displacement under loaded and unloaded conditions before and after the Lisfranc ligament was cut (intact and cut conditions). The first and second cuneiforms and their metatarsals were removed, and the attachment sites of the dorsal and the Lisfranc ligament were digitized. The three-dimensional positions of the bones and ligament displacement were determined. The significance of differences between conditions was tested with analysis of variance, and linear regression analysis was used to test the correlation between dorsal and plantar displacements. Results: There was a significant difference, of 1.3mm, in themean displacement between the cut loaded and intact loaded conditions (p < 0.0001). A modest correlation (r2 = 0.60) was found between dorsal displacement and displacement at the site of the Lisfranc ligament, possibly attributable to rotations between the first cuneiform and second metatarsal. Conclusions: Isolated sectioning of the Lisfranc ligament is sufficient to consistently create diastasis at the Lisfranc joint. Dorsal displacements between the first cuneiform and second metatarsal are a modest predictor of plantar displacements. Clinical Relevance: This model can be used to compare different materials for or methods of fixation used to stabilize the Lisfranc joint, such as screws or sutures with endobuttons or ligament substitutes, in the future.",
author = "Vinod Panchbhavi and Andersen, {Clark R.} and Santaram Vallurupalli and Jinping Yang",
year = "2008",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2106/JBJS.G.01420",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "90",
pages = "2707--2713",
journal = "Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - American Volume",
issn = "0021-9355",
publisher = "Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Inc.",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A minimally disruptive model and three-dimensional evaluation of lisfranc joint diastasis

AU - Panchbhavi, Vinod

AU - Andersen, Clark R.

AU - Vallurupalli, Santaram

AU - Yang, Jinping

PY - 2008/12/1

Y1 - 2008/12/1

N2 - Background: There is no model that can reproduce the diastasis at the Lisfranc joint after isolated transection of the Lisfranc ligament. Prior models required extensive sectioning of ligaments in the midfoot and represent injuries that cause extensive tarsometatarsal fracture-dislocations. They do not represent a subset of injuries that cause subtle or limited disruption at the Lisfranc joint. The purpose of this study was to create a model with the minimum amount of ligamentous disruption and loading necessary to consistently observe diastasis at the Lisfranc joint. Methods: Fourteen fresh-frozen paired cadaver feet were dissected to expose the dorsum. Three screws were inserted into each first cuneiform and second metatarsal to create a pair of registration triads. A digitizer was utilized to record the three-dimensional positions of the screws and their displacement under loaded and unloaded conditions before and after the Lisfranc ligament was cut (intact and cut conditions). The first and second cuneiforms and their metatarsals were removed, and the attachment sites of the dorsal and the Lisfranc ligament were digitized. The three-dimensional positions of the bones and ligament displacement were determined. The significance of differences between conditions was tested with analysis of variance, and linear regression analysis was used to test the correlation between dorsal and plantar displacements. Results: There was a significant difference, of 1.3mm, in themean displacement between the cut loaded and intact loaded conditions (p < 0.0001). A modest correlation (r2 = 0.60) was found between dorsal displacement and displacement at the site of the Lisfranc ligament, possibly attributable to rotations between the first cuneiform and second metatarsal. Conclusions: Isolated sectioning of the Lisfranc ligament is sufficient to consistently create diastasis at the Lisfranc joint. Dorsal displacements between the first cuneiform and second metatarsal are a modest predictor of plantar displacements. Clinical Relevance: This model can be used to compare different materials for or methods of fixation used to stabilize the Lisfranc joint, such as screws or sutures with endobuttons or ligament substitutes, in the future.

AB - Background: There is no model that can reproduce the diastasis at the Lisfranc joint after isolated transection of the Lisfranc ligament. Prior models required extensive sectioning of ligaments in the midfoot and represent injuries that cause extensive tarsometatarsal fracture-dislocations. They do not represent a subset of injuries that cause subtle or limited disruption at the Lisfranc joint. The purpose of this study was to create a model with the minimum amount of ligamentous disruption and loading necessary to consistently observe diastasis at the Lisfranc joint. Methods: Fourteen fresh-frozen paired cadaver feet were dissected to expose the dorsum. Three screws were inserted into each first cuneiform and second metatarsal to create a pair of registration triads. A digitizer was utilized to record the three-dimensional positions of the screws and their displacement under loaded and unloaded conditions before and after the Lisfranc ligament was cut (intact and cut conditions). The first and second cuneiforms and their metatarsals were removed, and the attachment sites of the dorsal and the Lisfranc ligament were digitized. The three-dimensional positions of the bones and ligament displacement were determined. The significance of differences between conditions was tested with analysis of variance, and linear regression analysis was used to test the correlation between dorsal and plantar displacements. Results: There was a significant difference, of 1.3mm, in themean displacement between the cut loaded and intact loaded conditions (p < 0.0001). A modest correlation (r2 = 0.60) was found between dorsal displacement and displacement at the site of the Lisfranc ligament, possibly attributable to rotations between the first cuneiform and second metatarsal. Conclusions: Isolated sectioning of the Lisfranc ligament is sufficient to consistently create diastasis at the Lisfranc joint. Dorsal displacements between the first cuneiform and second metatarsal are a modest predictor of plantar displacements. Clinical Relevance: This model can be used to compare different materials for or methods of fixation used to stabilize the Lisfranc joint, such as screws or sutures with endobuttons or ligament substitutes, in the future.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=57349180586&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=57349180586&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2106/JBJS.G.01420

DO - 10.2106/JBJS.G.01420

M3 - Article

C2 - 19047717

AN - SCOPUS:57349180586

VL - 90

SP - 2707

EP - 2713

JO - Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - American Volume

JF - Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - American Volume

SN - 0021-9355

IS - 12

ER -