A qualitative analysis of the vaccine intention–behaviour relationship

parents’ descriptions of their intentions, decision-making behaviour and planning processes towards HPV vaccination

Beth Auslander, Jessica M. Meers, Mary B. Short, Gregory D. Zimet, Susan L. Rosenthal

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Objective: The objective of this study is to identify factors influencing the vaccine intention–behaviour relationship. Design: A total of 445 parents who received a brief intervention to promote HPV vaccination were categorized based on their intentions post-intervention (yes/unsure/eventually/never) and subsequent adolescents’ vaccine status (yes/no). Fifty-one of these parents participated in qualitative interviews. Main Outcome Measures: Parents described their intentions, decision-making and planning processes towards vaccination. Framework analysis was used to analyse the data. Results: Parents in the ‘Yes/Yes’ category were knowledgeable about HPV/vaccine, described strong, stable intentions, considered themselves the primary decision-makers about vaccination and said they vaccinated immediately. ‘Yes/No’ parents described strong intentions and thought their adolescent was vaccinated OR described hesitant intentions, seeking advice/agreement from others and noting barriers to vaccination without solutions. ‘Unsure/Yes’ parents described their intentions as strengthening with information from credible sources and identified strategies for overcoming barriers. ‘Unsure/No’ and ‘Eventually/No’ parents had misinformation/negative beliefs regarding vaccination, described being ambivalent or non-supportive of vaccination and cited barriers to vaccination. ‘Never/No’ parents held negative beliefs about vaccination, described strong, stable intentions to NOT vaccinate, deferring the decision to others, and reported no planning towards vaccination. Conclusions: Intention characteristics and planning processes could moderate the vaccine intention–behaviour relationship, potentially serving as targets for future vaccine strategies.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    JournalPsychology and Health
    DOIs
    StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

    Fingerprint

    Decision Making
    Vaccination
    Vaccines
    Parents
    Papillomavirus Vaccines
    Communication
    Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
    Interviews

    Keywords

    • ambivalence
    • HPV vaccination
    • Human papillomavirus
    • intention–behaviour relationship
    • parent vaccine decision-making
    • vaccine acceptance

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Applied Psychology
    • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

    Cite this

    @article{787d818168234b87bdc9aea5db42bbc9,
    title = "A qualitative analysis of the vaccine intention–behaviour relationship: parents’ descriptions of their intentions, decision-making behaviour and planning processes towards HPV vaccination",
    abstract = "Objective: The objective of this study is to identify factors influencing the vaccine intention–behaviour relationship. Design: A total of 445 parents who received a brief intervention to promote HPV vaccination were categorized based on their intentions post-intervention (yes/unsure/eventually/never) and subsequent adolescents’ vaccine status (yes/no). Fifty-one of these parents participated in qualitative interviews. Main Outcome Measures: Parents described their intentions, decision-making and planning processes towards vaccination. Framework analysis was used to analyse the data. Results: Parents in the ‘Yes/Yes’ category were knowledgeable about HPV/vaccine, described strong, stable intentions, considered themselves the primary decision-makers about vaccination and said they vaccinated immediately. ‘Yes/No’ parents described strong intentions and thought their adolescent was vaccinated OR described hesitant intentions, seeking advice/agreement from others and noting barriers to vaccination without solutions. ‘Unsure/Yes’ parents described their intentions as strengthening with information from credible sources and identified strategies for overcoming barriers. ‘Unsure/No’ and ‘Eventually/No’ parents had misinformation/negative beliefs regarding vaccination, described being ambivalent or non-supportive of vaccination and cited barriers to vaccination. ‘Never/No’ parents held negative beliefs about vaccination, described strong, stable intentions to NOT vaccinate, deferring the decision to others, and reported no planning towards vaccination. Conclusions: Intention characteristics and planning processes could moderate the vaccine intention–behaviour relationship, potentially serving as targets for future vaccine strategies.",
    keywords = "ambivalence, HPV vaccination, Human papillomavirus, intention–behaviour relationship, parent vaccine decision-making, vaccine acceptance",
    author = "Beth Auslander and Meers, {Jessica M.} and Short, {Mary B.} and Zimet, {Gregory D.} and Rosenthal, {Susan L.}",
    year = "2018",
    month = "1",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1080/08870446.2018.1523408",
    language = "English (US)",
    journal = "Psychology and Health",
    issn = "0887-0446",
    publisher = "Routledge",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - A qualitative analysis of the vaccine intention–behaviour relationship

    T2 - parents’ descriptions of their intentions, decision-making behaviour and planning processes towards HPV vaccination

    AU - Auslander, Beth

    AU - Meers, Jessica M.

    AU - Short, Mary B.

    AU - Zimet, Gregory D.

    AU - Rosenthal, Susan L.

    PY - 2018/1/1

    Y1 - 2018/1/1

    N2 - Objective: The objective of this study is to identify factors influencing the vaccine intention–behaviour relationship. Design: A total of 445 parents who received a brief intervention to promote HPV vaccination were categorized based on their intentions post-intervention (yes/unsure/eventually/never) and subsequent adolescents’ vaccine status (yes/no). Fifty-one of these parents participated in qualitative interviews. Main Outcome Measures: Parents described their intentions, decision-making and planning processes towards vaccination. Framework analysis was used to analyse the data. Results: Parents in the ‘Yes/Yes’ category were knowledgeable about HPV/vaccine, described strong, stable intentions, considered themselves the primary decision-makers about vaccination and said they vaccinated immediately. ‘Yes/No’ parents described strong intentions and thought their adolescent was vaccinated OR described hesitant intentions, seeking advice/agreement from others and noting barriers to vaccination without solutions. ‘Unsure/Yes’ parents described their intentions as strengthening with information from credible sources and identified strategies for overcoming barriers. ‘Unsure/No’ and ‘Eventually/No’ parents had misinformation/negative beliefs regarding vaccination, described being ambivalent or non-supportive of vaccination and cited barriers to vaccination. ‘Never/No’ parents held negative beliefs about vaccination, described strong, stable intentions to NOT vaccinate, deferring the decision to others, and reported no planning towards vaccination. Conclusions: Intention characteristics and planning processes could moderate the vaccine intention–behaviour relationship, potentially serving as targets for future vaccine strategies.

    AB - Objective: The objective of this study is to identify factors influencing the vaccine intention–behaviour relationship. Design: A total of 445 parents who received a brief intervention to promote HPV vaccination were categorized based on their intentions post-intervention (yes/unsure/eventually/never) and subsequent adolescents’ vaccine status (yes/no). Fifty-one of these parents participated in qualitative interviews. Main Outcome Measures: Parents described their intentions, decision-making and planning processes towards vaccination. Framework analysis was used to analyse the data. Results: Parents in the ‘Yes/Yes’ category were knowledgeable about HPV/vaccine, described strong, stable intentions, considered themselves the primary decision-makers about vaccination and said they vaccinated immediately. ‘Yes/No’ parents described strong intentions and thought their adolescent was vaccinated OR described hesitant intentions, seeking advice/agreement from others and noting barriers to vaccination without solutions. ‘Unsure/Yes’ parents described their intentions as strengthening with information from credible sources and identified strategies for overcoming barriers. ‘Unsure/No’ and ‘Eventually/No’ parents had misinformation/negative beliefs regarding vaccination, described being ambivalent or non-supportive of vaccination and cited barriers to vaccination. ‘Never/No’ parents held negative beliefs about vaccination, described strong, stable intentions to NOT vaccinate, deferring the decision to others, and reported no planning towards vaccination. Conclusions: Intention characteristics and planning processes could moderate the vaccine intention–behaviour relationship, potentially serving as targets for future vaccine strategies.

    KW - ambivalence

    KW - HPV vaccination

    KW - Human papillomavirus

    KW - intention–behaviour relationship

    KW - parent vaccine decision-making

    KW - vaccine acceptance

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057547777&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85057547777&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1080/08870446.2018.1523408

    DO - 10.1080/08870446.2018.1523408

    M3 - Article

    JO - Psychology and Health

    JF - Psychology and Health

    SN - 0887-0446

    ER -