TY - JOUR
T1 - A Qualitative Study of a Pilot of Clinician Perspectives on the Delivery of Medicare Annual Wellness Visits for Patients with Dementia in an Academic Health Science Center in Texas
AU - Tzeng, Huey Ming
AU - Kuo, Yong Fang
AU - Pappadis, Monique R.
AU - Hennessy, Elizabeth A.
AU - Marquez-Bhojani, Maribel M.
AU - David, Samuel V.
AU - Passy, Elise
AU - Raji, Mukaila A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2026. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
PY - 2026/1/1
Y1 - 2026/1/1
N2 - Background: Little is known about clinicians’ perspectives on the process and outcomes of Medicare Annual Wellness Visits (AWVs) in Medicare beneficiaries with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD). Objectives: We sought clinicians’ opinions on the impact of AWVs on health outcomes and disparity reduction for beneficiaries with MCI/ADRD. Design: Institute for Healthcare Improvement’s 4Ms framework of an age-friendly health system informed the design of this qualitative study of a pilot. Methods: We used convenience sampling and recruited clinicians from a single academic-health-science center’s catchment area in Texas, who billed for at least 1 AWV to participate in a one-time, one-on-one, semi-structured interview conducted via phone/Zoom. Participants verbally agreed to participate. This study met the federal regulations for a Quality Assessment project. Results: We interviewed 26 clinicians (17 female; 26 non-Hispanic, 12 White, 10 Asian, 4 Black; 16 in family medicine and 5 in internal medicine). Most agreed AWVs improve health outcomes (n = 23, 88.5%) and reduce health disparities for Medicare beneficiaries with MCI/ADRD (n = 20, 76.9%). The top three “what works” themes were: (1) non-primary care providers (eg, wellness nurses) streamline AWV delivery by screening patients, providing resources/support, and sharing abnormal findings with primary care providers (PCPs); (2) PCPs do AWVs themselves to be in alignment with issues identified; and (3) sufficient time allotted to learn what matters most to patients and caregivers. The top three “what does not work” themes were: (1) clinicians desire having a family caregiver present; (2) clinicians need the full hour for in-depth screenings and holistic care; and (3) clinics need on-site social workers to address nonmedical issues. Conclusions: Clinicians agreed that AWVs helped improve health outcomes and reduce health disparities. Tailoring AWV components by MCI/ADRD stage will optimize the visit, maximize health outcomes, and decrease disparities in access to care.
AB - Background: Little is known about clinicians’ perspectives on the process and outcomes of Medicare Annual Wellness Visits (AWVs) in Medicare beneficiaries with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD). Objectives: We sought clinicians’ opinions on the impact of AWVs on health outcomes and disparity reduction for beneficiaries with MCI/ADRD. Design: Institute for Healthcare Improvement’s 4Ms framework of an age-friendly health system informed the design of this qualitative study of a pilot. Methods: We used convenience sampling and recruited clinicians from a single academic-health-science center’s catchment area in Texas, who billed for at least 1 AWV to participate in a one-time, one-on-one, semi-structured interview conducted via phone/Zoom. Participants verbally agreed to participate. This study met the federal regulations for a Quality Assessment project. Results: We interviewed 26 clinicians (17 female; 26 non-Hispanic, 12 White, 10 Asian, 4 Black; 16 in family medicine and 5 in internal medicine). Most agreed AWVs improve health outcomes (n = 23, 88.5%) and reduce health disparities for Medicare beneficiaries with MCI/ADRD (n = 20, 76.9%). The top three “what works” themes were: (1) non-primary care providers (eg, wellness nurses) streamline AWV delivery by screening patients, providing resources/support, and sharing abnormal findings with primary care providers (PCPs); (2) PCPs do AWVs themselves to be in alignment with issues identified; and (3) sufficient time allotted to learn what matters most to patients and caregivers. The top three “what does not work” themes were: (1) clinicians desire having a family caregiver present; (2) clinicians need the full hour for in-depth screenings and holistic care; and (3) clinics need on-site social workers to address nonmedical issues. Conclusions: Clinicians agreed that AWVs helped improve health outcomes and reduce health disparities. Tailoring AWV components by MCI/ADRD stage will optimize the visit, maximize health outcomes, and decrease disparities in access to care.
KW - Medicare
KW - aging
KW - dementia
KW - mild neurocognitive disorders
KW - screening
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105034913451
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105034913451#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1177/11786329261432894
DO - 10.1177/11786329261432894
M3 - Article
C2 - 41928782
AN - SCOPUS:105034913451
SN - 1178-6329
VL - 19
JO - Health Services Insights
JF - Health Services Insights
ER -