A randomised controlled trial of a double layer of Allevyn™ compared to Jellonet and proflavin as a tie-over dressing for small skin grafts

D. Atherton, V. Sreetharan, A. Mosahebi, S. Prior, J. Willis, J. Bishop, Peter Dziewulski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: The tie-over dressing is used to encourage skin graft take by minimising dead space, reducing seroma and haematoma formation and by graft immobilisation. Various materials have been proposed, however we have compared one of the most popular, Jellonet with a bolster of proflavin-soaked cotton wool, to a newer dressing, Allevyn™ foam. Patients and methods: Sixty patients were recruited and randomised into either group. Any patient requiring surgery involving a split or full thickness graft due to be carried out in the outpatient department on any site was invited to participate. Outcome measures included percentage take, pain on dressing removal (visual analogue scale) and infection. Ethical approval was obtained from the North and Mid Essex Local Research Ethics Committee. Results: There was no statistical difference in graft take between the two groups at day 5 (P = 0.963). The Allevyn™ dressing was statistically more comfortable (P = 0.0182). Discussion: We propose that Allevyn™ foam provides an effective and comfortable method for securing small split and full thickness skin grafts. While offering equal levels of graft take, improved levels of comfort may lend itself to use in sensitive areas such as the nose, ear and around the eye.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)535-539
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery
Volume61
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Proflavine
Bandages
Randomized Controlled Trials
Transplants
Skin
Seroma
Wool
Research Ethics Committees
Visual Analog Scale
Nose
Immobilization
Hematoma
Ear
allevyn
Outpatients
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Pain
Infection

Keywords

  • Allevyn™
  • Proflavin
  • Skin graft
  • Tie-over

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

A randomised controlled trial of a double layer of Allevyn™ compared to Jellonet and proflavin as a tie-over dressing for small skin grafts. / Atherton, D.; Sreetharan, V.; Mosahebi, A.; Prior, S.; Willis, J.; Bishop, J.; Dziewulski, Peter.

In: Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Vol. 61, No. 5, 01.05.2008, p. 535-539.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0e44ed82d4554419a407a50550b9ede9,
title = "A randomised controlled trial of a double layer of Allevyn™ compared to Jellonet and proflavin as a tie-over dressing for small skin grafts",
abstract = "Introduction: The tie-over dressing is used to encourage skin graft take by minimising dead space, reducing seroma and haematoma formation and by graft immobilisation. Various materials have been proposed, however we have compared one of the most popular, Jellonet with a bolster of proflavin-soaked cotton wool, to a newer dressing, Allevyn™ foam. Patients and methods: Sixty patients were recruited and randomised into either group. Any patient requiring surgery involving a split or full thickness graft due to be carried out in the outpatient department on any site was invited to participate. Outcome measures included percentage take, pain on dressing removal (visual analogue scale) and infection. Ethical approval was obtained from the North and Mid Essex Local Research Ethics Committee. Results: There was no statistical difference in graft take between the two groups at day 5 (P = 0.963). The Allevyn™ dressing was statistically more comfortable (P = 0.0182). Discussion: We propose that Allevyn™ foam provides an effective and comfortable method for securing small split and full thickness skin grafts. While offering equal levels of graft take, improved levels of comfort may lend itself to use in sensitive areas such as the nose, ear and around the eye.",
keywords = "Allevyn™, Proflavin, Skin graft, Tie-over",
author = "D. Atherton and V. Sreetharan and A. Mosahebi and S. Prior and J. Willis and J. Bishop and Peter Dziewulski",
year = "2008",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.bjps.2007.01.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "61",
pages = "535--539",
journal = "Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery",
issn = "1748-6815",
publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A randomised controlled trial of a double layer of Allevyn™ compared to Jellonet and proflavin as a tie-over dressing for small skin grafts

AU - Atherton, D.

AU - Sreetharan, V.

AU - Mosahebi, A.

AU - Prior, S.

AU - Willis, J.

AU - Bishop, J.

AU - Dziewulski, Peter

PY - 2008/5/1

Y1 - 2008/5/1

N2 - Introduction: The tie-over dressing is used to encourage skin graft take by minimising dead space, reducing seroma and haematoma formation and by graft immobilisation. Various materials have been proposed, however we have compared one of the most popular, Jellonet with a bolster of proflavin-soaked cotton wool, to a newer dressing, Allevyn™ foam. Patients and methods: Sixty patients were recruited and randomised into either group. Any patient requiring surgery involving a split or full thickness graft due to be carried out in the outpatient department on any site was invited to participate. Outcome measures included percentage take, pain on dressing removal (visual analogue scale) and infection. Ethical approval was obtained from the North and Mid Essex Local Research Ethics Committee. Results: There was no statistical difference in graft take between the two groups at day 5 (P = 0.963). The Allevyn™ dressing was statistically more comfortable (P = 0.0182). Discussion: We propose that Allevyn™ foam provides an effective and comfortable method for securing small split and full thickness skin grafts. While offering equal levels of graft take, improved levels of comfort may lend itself to use in sensitive areas such as the nose, ear and around the eye.

AB - Introduction: The tie-over dressing is used to encourage skin graft take by minimising dead space, reducing seroma and haematoma formation and by graft immobilisation. Various materials have been proposed, however we have compared one of the most popular, Jellonet with a bolster of proflavin-soaked cotton wool, to a newer dressing, Allevyn™ foam. Patients and methods: Sixty patients were recruited and randomised into either group. Any patient requiring surgery involving a split or full thickness graft due to be carried out in the outpatient department on any site was invited to participate. Outcome measures included percentage take, pain on dressing removal (visual analogue scale) and infection. Ethical approval was obtained from the North and Mid Essex Local Research Ethics Committee. Results: There was no statistical difference in graft take between the two groups at day 5 (P = 0.963). The Allevyn™ dressing was statistically more comfortable (P = 0.0182). Discussion: We propose that Allevyn™ foam provides an effective and comfortable method for securing small split and full thickness skin grafts. While offering equal levels of graft take, improved levels of comfort may lend itself to use in sensitive areas such as the nose, ear and around the eye.

KW - Allevyn™

KW - Proflavin

KW - Skin graft

KW - Tie-over

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=43049123788&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=43049123788&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.bjps.2007.01.004

DO - 10.1016/j.bjps.2007.01.004

M3 - Article

VL - 61

SP - 535

EP - 539

JO - Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery

JF - Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery

SN - 1748-6815

IS - 5

ER -