A topical antimicrobial test system (TOPITEST): Nathan's Agar Well revisited

J. P. Heggers, E. S. Carino, J. A. Sazy, J. L. Theissen, R. Mann, R. Rutan, M. C. Robson, David Herndon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Nathan's Agar Well Diffusion (NAWD) assay is a topical antimicrobial susceptibility predictor originally presented in 1977. It provided the burn surgeon information on the appropriate topical antimicrobial necessary to control burn wound infection. A new topical antimicrobial assay (TOPITEST) was compared in two phases. Phase I was designed to compare the new TOPITEST which uses Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) agar as its basal medium with a modified NAWD (M:NAWD) which uses Mueller-Hinton Agar (MHA). Clinical isolates from burned wound biopsies previously tested by the M:NAWD assay were tested in replicate. The use of this procedure provides very important clinical information as it is our routine topical susceptibility assay which we rely upon to provide our topical therapeutic approach in the treatment of localized burn wound infections. ATCC strains of Staphylococcus aureus (SAUR), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PSAR) and Escherichia coli (ECOL) were used in both systems for quality control (QC). We compared both systems on how well they agreed regarding bacterial sensitivity or resistance. All 178 gram-negative isolates were in perfect agreement (perfect agreement of 100%, p > 0.0001) however, the zones of inhibition were appreciable enhanced for the MHA base. Similar results were observed for the 147 gram-positive isolates, with the exception of Bacitracin and Polymyxin combination (BP). Phase II compared the TOPITEST in the same manner as Phase I substituting MHA in the pre-packaged system. Of the 239 gram-negative and positive isolates all were in 100% agreement. Comparisons among the specific pathogens selected and tested with TOPITEST using both basal media revealed that the majority of responses were in perfect agreement with the exception of BP for QC.ECOL, QC.SAUR and Klebsiella species (KLEB). These data suggest that susceptibility is dependent on the basal medium used for diffusion assays or on the vehicle they are compounded in.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)109-116
Number of pages8
JournalSurgical Research Communications
Volume8
Issue number2
StatePublished - 1990

Fingerprint

Agar
Quality Control
Wound Infection
Staphylococcus aureus
Polymyxins
Escherichia coli
Bacitracin
Klebsiella
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Biopsy
Wounds and Injuries
Brain
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • agar diffusion
  • Nathan's agar well diffusion
  • topical susceptibility
  • TOPITEST

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Heggers, J. P., Carino, E. S., Sazy, J. A., Theissen, J. L., Mann, R., Rutan, R., ... Herndon, D. (1990). A topical antimicrobial test system (TOPITEST): Nathan's Agar Well revisited. Surgical Research Communications, 8(2), 109-116.

A topical antimicrobial test system (TOPITEST) : Nathan's Agar Well revisited. / Heggers, J. P.; Carino, E. S.; Sazy, J. A.; Theissen, J. L.; Mann, R.; Rutan, R.; Robson, M. C.; Herndon, David.

In: Surgical Research Communications, Vol. 8, No. 2, 1990, p. 109-116.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Heggers, JP, Carino, ES, Sazy, JA, Theissen, JL, Mann, R, Rutan, R, Robson, MC & Herndon, D 1990, 'A topical antimicrobial test system (TOPITEST): Nathan's Agar Well revisited', Surgical Research Communications, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 109-116.
Heggers JP, Carino ES, Sazy JA, Theissen JL, Mann R, Rutan R et al. A topical antimicrobial test system (TOPITEST): Nathan's Agar Well revisited. Surgical Research Communications. 1990;8(2):109-116.
Heggers, J. P. ; Carino, E. S. ; Sazy, J. A. ; Theissen, J. L. ; Mann, R. ; Rutan, R. ; Robson, M. C. ; Herndon, David. / A topical antimicrobial test system (TOPITEST) : Nathan's Agar Well revisited. In: Surgical Research Communications. 1990 ; Vol. 8, No. 2. pp. 109-116.
@article{a352bca3fea04728bca058b3f4a18e99,
title = "A topical antimicrobial test system (TOPITEST): Nathan's Agar Well revisited",
abstract = "Nathan's Agar Well Diffusion (NAWD) assay is a topical antimicrobial susceptibility predictor originally presented in 1977. It provided the burn surgeon information on the appropriate topical antimicrobial necessary to control burn wound infection. A new topical antimicrobial assay (TOPITEST) was compared in two phases. Phase I was designed to compare the new TOPITEST which uses Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) agar as its basal medium with a modified NAWD (M:NAWD) which uses Mueller-Hinton Agar (MHA). Clinical isolates from burned wound biopsies previously tested by the M:NAWD assay were tested in replicate. The use of this procedure provides very important clinical information as it is our routine topical susceptibility assay which we rely upon to provide our topical therapeutic approach in the treatment of localized burn wound infections. ATCC strains of Staphylococcus aureus (SAUR), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PSAR) and Escherichia coli (ECOL) were used in both systems for quality control (QC). We compared both systems on how well they agreed regarding bacterial sensitivity or resistance. All 178 gram-negative isolates were in perfect agreement (perfect agreement of 100{\%}, p > 0.0001) however, the zones of inhibition were appreciable enhanced for the MHA base. Similar results were observed for the 147 gram-positive isolates, with the exception of Bacitracin and Polymyxin combination (BP). Phase II compared the TOPITEST in the same manner as Phase I substituting MHA in the pre-packaged system. Of the 239 gram-negative and positive isolates all were in 100{\%} agreement. Comparisons among the specific pathogens selected and tested with TOPITEST using both basal media revealed that the majority of responses were in perfect agreement with the exception of BP for QC.ECOL, QC.SAUR and Klebsiella species (KLEB). These data suggest that susceptibility is dependent on the basal medium used for diffusion assays or on the vehicle they are compounded in.",
keywords = "agar diffusion, Nathan's agar well diffusion, topical susceptibility, TOPITEST",
author = "Heggers, {J. P.} and Carino, {E. S.} and Sazy, {J. A.} and Theissen, {J. L.} and R. Mann and R. Rutan and Robson, {M. C.} and David Herndon",
year = "1990",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "109--116",
journal = "Surgical Research Communications",
issn = "0882-9233",
publisher = "M. Gordan and Breach - Harwood Academic",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A topical antimicrobial test system (TOPITEST)

T2 - Nathan's Agar Well revisited

AU - Heggers, J. P.

AU - Carino, E. S.

AU - Sazy, J. A.

AU - Theissen, J. L.

AU - Mann, R.

AU - Rutan, R.

AU - Robson, M. C.

AU - Herndon, David

PY - 1990

Y1 - 1990

N2 - Nathan's Agar Well Diffusion (NAWD) assay is a topical antimicrobial susceptibility predictor originally presented in 1977. It provided the burn surgeon information on the appropriate topical antimicrobial necessary to control burn wound infection. A new topical antimicrobial assay (TOPITEST) was compared in two phases. Phase I was designed to compare the new TOPITEST which uses Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) agar as its basal medium with a modified NAWD (M:NAWD) which uses Mueller-Hinton Agar (MHA). Clinical isolates from burned wound biopsies previously tested by the M:NAWD assay were tested in replicate. The use of this procedure provides very important clinical information as it is our routine topical susceptibility assay which we rely upon to provide our topical therapeutic approach in the treatment of localized burn wound infections. ATCC strains of Staphylococcus aureus (SAUR), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PSAR) and Escherichia coli (ECOL) were used in both systems for quality control (QC). We compared both systems on how well they agreed regarding bacterial sensitivity or resistance. All 178 gram-negative isolates were in perfect agreement (perfect agreement of 100%, p > 0.0001) however, the zones of inhibition were appreciable enhanced for the MHA base. Similar results were observed for the 147 gram-positive isolates, with the exception of Bacitracin and Polymyxin combination (BP). Phase II compared the TOPITEST in the same manner as Phase I substituting MHA in the pre-packaged system. Of the 239 gram-negative and positive isolates all were in 100% agreement. Comparisons among the specific pathogens selected and tested with TOPITEST using both basal media revealed that the majority of responses were in perfect agreement with the exception of BP for QC.ECOL, QC.SAUR and Klebsiella species (KLEB). These data suggest that susceptibility is dependent on the basal medium used for diffusion assays or on the vehicle they are compounded in.

AB - Nathan's Agar Well Diffusion (NAWD) assay is a topical antimicrobial susceptibility predictor originally presented in 1977. It provided the burn surgeon information on the appropriate topical antimicrobial necessary to control burn wound infection. A new topical antimicrobial assay (TOPITEST) was compared in two phases. Phase I was designed to compare the new TOPITEST which uses Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) agar as its basal medium with a modified NAWD (M:NAWD) which uses Mueller-Hinton Agar (MHA). Clinical isolates from burned wound biopsies previously tested by the M:NAWD assay were tested in replicate. The use of this procedure provides very important clinical information as it is our routine topical susceptibility assay which we rely upon to provide our topical therapeutic approach in the treatment of localized burn wound infections. ATCC strains of Staphylococcus aureus (SAUR), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PSAR) and Escherichia coli (ECOL) were used in both systems for quality control (QC). We compared both systems on how well they agreed regarding bacterial sensitivity or resistance. All 178 gram-negative isolates were in perfect agreement (perfect agreement of 100%, p > 0.0001) however, the zones of inhibition were appreciable enhanced for the MHA base. Similar results were observed for the 147 gram-positive isolates, with the exception of Bacitracin and Polymyxin combination (BP). Phase II compared the TOPITEST in the same manner as Phase I substituting MHA in the pre-packaged system. Of the 239 gram-negative and positive isolates all were in 100% agreement. Comparisons among the specific pathogens selected and tested with TOPITEST using both basal media revealed that the majority of responses were in perfect agreement with the exception of BP for QC.ECOL, QC.SAUR and Klebsiella species (KLEB). These data suggest that susceptibility is dependent on the basal medium used for diffusion assays or on the vehicle they are compounded in.

KW - agar diffusion

KW - Nathan's agar well diffusion

KW - topical susceptibility

KW - TOPITEST

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025365242&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025365242&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0025365242

VL - 8

SP - 109

EP - 116

JO - Surgical Research Communications

JF - Surgical Research Communications

SN - 0882-9233

IS - 2

ER -