Academic Promotion at a Medical School

Michael Laposata, Mark L. Batshaw, Leslie Plotnick, Brent G. Petty, Patricia Woolf, E. David Mellits

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterpeer-review

Abstract

To the Editor: There is a serious flaw in the analysis by Batshaw et al. (March 24 issue)* of the factors required for academic promotion. A category of papers published with the assistant professor as first author is inappropriately included in the analysis in place of a category of papers on which the candidate was the senior author, whether listed first or listed last, with a trainee in his or her laboratory as the first author. Including easily tabulated first authorships as a separate category is misleading, and excluding papers published with the candidate as “senior author,” which would have.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)799-800
Number of pages2
JournalNew England Journal of Medicine
Volume319
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 22 1988
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Academic Promotion at a Medical School'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this