Accuracy and precision of cone-beam computed tomography guided intensity modulated radiation therapy

Matthew W. Sutton, Jonas D. Fontenot, Kenneth L. Matthews, Brent Parker, Maurice L. King, John P. Gibbons, Kenneth R. Hogstrom

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the accuracy and precision of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-guided intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Methods and Materials: A 7-field intensity modulated radiation therapy plan was constructed for an anthropomorphic head phantom loaded with a custom cassette containing radiochromic film. The phantom was positioned on the treatment table at 9 locations: 1 "correct" position and 8 "misaligned" positions along 3 orthogonal axes. A commercial kilovoltage cone-beam computed tomography (kV-CBCT) system (VolumeView, Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) was then used to align the phantom prior to plan delivery. The treatment plan was delivered using the radiation therapy delivery system (Infinity; Elekta AB) 3 times for each of the 9 positions, allowing film measurement of the delivered dose distribution in 3 orthogonal planes. Comparison of the planned and delivered dose profiles along the major axes provided an estimate of the accuracy and precision of CBCT-guided IMRT. Results: On average, targeting accuracy was found to be within 1 mm in all 3 major anatomic planes. Over all 54 measured dose profiles, the means and standard errors of the displacement of the center of the field between the measured and calculated profiles for each of the right-left, anterior-posterior, and superior-inferior axes were +. 0.08 ± 0.07 mm, +. 0.60 ± 0.08 mm, and +. 0.78 ± 0.16 mm, respectively. Agreement between planned and measured 80% profiles was less than 0.4 mm on either side along the right-left axis. A systematic shift of the measured profile of slightly less than 1 mm in anterior and superior directions was noted along the anterior-posterior and superior-inferior axes, respectively. Conclusions: Submillimeter targeting accuracy can be achieved using a commercial kV-CBCT IGRT system.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalPractical Radiation Oncology
Volume4
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
Radiotherapy
Sweden
Head
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Accuracy and precision of cone-beam computed tomography guided intensity modulated radiation therapy. / Sutton, Matthew W.; Fontenot, Jonas D.; Matthews, Kenneth L.; Parker, Brent; King, Maurice L.; Gibbons, John P.; Hogstrom, Kenneth R.

In: Practical Radiation Oncology, Vol. 4, No. 1, 01.2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sutton, Matthew W. ; Fontenot, Jonas D. ; Matthews, Kenneth L. ; Parker, Brent ; King, Maurice L. ; Gibbons, John P. ; Hogstrom, Kenneth R. / Accuracy and precision of cone-beam computed tomography guided intensity modulated radiation therapy. In: Practical Radiation Oncology. 2014 ; Vol. 4, No. 1.
@article{9138464474ba44c08f2e1dab3b0288d6,
title = "Accuracy and precision of cone-beam computed tomography guided intensity modulated radiation therapy",
abstract = "Purpose: To assess the accuracy and precision of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-guided intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Methods and Materials: A 7-field intensity modulated radiation therapy plan was constructed for an anthropomorphic head phantom loaded with a custom cassette containing radiochromic film. The phantom was positioned on the treatment table at 9 locations: 1 {"}correct{"} position and 8 {"}misaligned{"} positions along 3 orthogonal axes. A commercial kilovoltage cone-beam computed tomography (kV-CBCT) system (VolumeView, Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) was then used to align the phantom prior to plan delivery. The treatment plan was delivered using the radiation therapy delivery system (Infinity; Elekta AB) 3 times for each of the 9 positions, allowing film measurement of the delivered dose distribution in 3 orthogonal planes. Comparison of the planned and delivered dose profiles along the major axes provided an estimate of the accuracy and precision of CBCT-guided IMRT. Results: On average, targeting accuracy was found to be within 1 mm in all 3 major anatomic planes. Over all 54 measured dose profiles, the means and standard errors of the displacement of the center of the field between the measured and calculated profiles for each of the right-left, anterior-posterior, and superior-inferior axes were +. 0.08 ± 0.07 mm, +. 0.60 ± 0.08 mm, and +. 0.78 ± 0.16 mm, respectively. Agreement between planned and measured 80{\%} profiles was less than 0.4 mm on either side along the right-left axis. A systematic shift of the measured profile of slightly less than 1 mm in anterior and superior directions was noted along the anterior-posterior and superior-inferior axes, respectively. Conclusions: Submillimeter targeting accuracy can be achieved using a commercial kV-CBCT IGRT system.",
author = "Sutton, {Matthew W.} and Fontenot, {Jonas D.} and Matthews, {Kenneth L.} and Brent Parker and King, {Maurice L.} and Gibbons, {John P.} and Hogstrom, {Kenneth R.}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.prro.2013.02.006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
journal = "Practical Radiation Oncology",
issn = "1879-8500",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accuracy and precision of cone-beam computed tomography guided intensity modulated radiation therapy

AU - Sutton, Matthew W.

AU - Fontenot, Jonas D.

AU - Matthews, Kenneth L.

AU - Parker, Brent

AU - King, Maurice L.

AU - Gibbons, John P.

AU - Hogstrom, Kenneth R.

PY - 2014/1

Y1 - 2014/1

N2 - Purpose: To assess the accuracy and precision of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-guided intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Methods and Materials: A 7-field intensity modulated radiation therapy plan was constructed for an anthropomorphic head phantom loaded with a custom cassette containing radiochromic film. The phantom was positioned on the treatment table at 9 locations: 1 "correct" position and 8 "misaligned" positions along 3 orthogonal axes. A commercial kilovoltage cone-beam computed tomography (kV-CBCT) system (VolumeView, Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) was then used to align the phantom prior to plan delivery. The treatment plan was delivered using the radiation therapy delivery system (Infinity; Elekta AB) 3 times for each of the 9 positions, allowing film measurement of the delivered dose distribution in 3 orthogonal planes. Comparison of the planned and delivered dose profiles along the major axes provided an estimate of the accuracy and precision of CBCT-guided IMRT. Results: On average, targeting accuracy was found to be within 1 mm in all 3 major anatomic planes. Over all 54 measured dose profiles, the means and standard errors of the displacement of the center of the field between the measured and calculated profiles for each of the right-left, anterior-posterior, and superior-inferior axes were +. 0.08 ± 0.07 mm, +. 0.60 ± 0.08 mm, and +. 0.78 ± 0.16 mm, respectively. Agreement between planned and measured 80% profiles was less than 0.4 mm on either side along the right-left axis. A systematic shift of the measured profile of slightly less than 1 mm in anterior and superior directions was noted along the anterior-posterior and superior-inferior axes, respectively. Conclusions: Submillimeter targeting accuracy can be achieved using a commercial kV-CBCT IGRT system.

AB - Purpose: To assess the accuracy and precision of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-guided intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Methods and Materials: A 7-field intensity modulated radiation therapy plan was constructed for an anthropomorphic head phantom loaded with a custom cassette containing radiochromic film. The phantom was positioned on the treatment table at 9 locations: 1 "correct" position and 8 "misaligned" positions along 3 orthogonal axes. A commercial kilovoltage cone-beam computed tomography (kV-CBCT) system (VolumeView, Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) was then used to align the phantom prior to plan delivery. The treatment plan was delivered using the radiation therapy delivery system (Infinity; Elekta AB) 3 times for each of the 9 positions, allowing film measurement of the delivered dose distribution in 3 orthogonal planes. Comparison of the planned and delivered dose profiles along the major axes provided an estimate of the accuracy and precision of CBCT-guided IMRT. Results: On average, targeting accuracy was found to be within 1 mm in all 3 major anatomic planes. Over all 54 measured dose profiles, the means and standard errors of the displacement of the center of the field between the measured and calculated profiles for each of the right-left, anterior-posterior, and superior-inferior axes were +. 0.08 ± 0.07 mm, +. 0.60 ± 0.08 mm, and +. 0.78 ± 0.16 mm, respectively. Agreement between planned and measured 80% profiles was less than 0.4 mm on either side along the right-left axis. A systematic shift of the measured profile of slightly less than 1 mm in anterior and superior directions was noted along the anterior-posterior and superior-inferior axes, respectively. Conclusions: Submillimeter targeting accuracy can be achieved using a commercial kV-CBCT IGRT system.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84890875203&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84890875203&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.prro.2013.02.006

DO - 10.1016/j.prro.2013.02.006

M3 - Article

C2 - 24621434

AN - SCOPUS:84890875203

VL - 4

JO - Practical Radiation Oncology

JF - Practical Radiation Oncology

SN - 1879-8500

IS - 1

ER -