Accuracy of Fluoroscopy Versus Computer-Assisted Navigation for the Placement of Anterior Cervical Pedicle Screws

Andrew G. Patton, Randal P. Morris, Yong Fang Kuo, Ronald Lindsey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study Design. Randomized laboratory cadaver study. Objective. The objective of this study was to determine the accuracy of anterior transpedicular screw placement in the cervical spine using conventional fluoroscopy versus computer-assisted navigation. Summary of Background Data. Traditionally, global cervical instability has required anterior and posterior fixation due to the superior biomechanical stability of circumferential constructs. Anterior transpedicular screws (ATPS) have recently been advocated as a single surgical approach. Current clinical publications report using fluoroscopic guidance for screw placement. Computer-assisted navigation (CAN) systems have demonstrated enhanced accuracy of pedicle screw placement at all spine levels but have not been assessed for ATPS. Methods. The anterior vertebrae of 9 fresh frozen cadaver cervical spines were exposed, preserving the lateral and posterior soft tissue envelope. Nine practicing spine surgeons placed 2.0-mm titanium anterior transpecidular Kirschner wires into the C3-T1 pedicles bilaterally using fluoroscopy or CAN guidance. Specimens were imaged by computed tomography and virtual screws were overlaid on the K-wires. Targeting accuracy was compared between the 2 techniques in all planes using a 5-level grading scale. Results. The percentage of acceptable screw placements for fluoroscopy and CAN was 42.6% and 66.7%, respectively (P = 0.012). Catastrophic screw placement (grade 3 or 4) was 33.3% for fluoroscopy and 16.7% for CAN. In the multivariable model, the accuracy rate was 67% lower for fluoroscopy than for CAN after controlling for other factors (odds ratio: 0.33, 95% confidence interval: 0.14-0.79). Conclusion. The accuracy of CAN-guided placement of K-wires for ATPS was superior to placement under fluoroscopic guidance, demonstrating statistically more acceptable screw placements and significantly less catastrophic virtual screws. However, malposition was still high, with potential for vertebral artery and neurological injury in a clinical setting. Further advancement in current ATPS techniques is warranted prior to widespread implementation in a patient setting. Level of Evidence: N/A.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)E404-E410
JournalSpine
Volume40
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2015

Fingerprint

Fluoroscopy
Spine
Cadaver
Bone Wires
Vertebral Artery
Pedicle Screws
Titanium
Publications
Odds Ratio
Tomography
Confidence Intervals
Wounds and Injuries

Keywords

  • anterior fixation
  • anterior transpedicular screws
  • cadaver study
  • catastrophic screw placement
  • cervical spine
  • computer-assisted navigation
  • fluoroscopic guidance
  • global cervical instability
  • pedicle screws
  • targeting accuracy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Accuracy of Fluoroscopy Versus Computer-Assisted Navigation for the Placement of Anterior Cervical Pedicle Screws. / Patton, Andrew G.; Morris, Randal P.; Kuo, Yong Fang; Lindsey, Ronald.

In: Spine, Vol. 40, No. 7, 01.04.2015, p. E404-E410.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ecd121d896ae40159363eb8e3a131b71,
title = "Accuracy of Fluoroscopy Versus Computer-Assisted Navigation for the Placement of Anterior Cervical Pedicle Screws",
abstract = "Study Design. Randomized laboratory cadaver study. Objective. The objective of this study was to determine the accuracy of anterior transpedicular screw placement in the cervical spine using conventional fluoroscopy versus computer-assisted navigation. Summary of Background Data. Traditionally, global cervical instability has required anterior and posterior fixation due to the superior biomechanical stability of circumferential constructs. Anterior transpedicular screws (ATPS) have recently been advocated as a single surgical approach. Current clinical publications report using fluoroscopic guidance for screw placement. Computer-assisted navigation (CAN) systems have demonstrated enhanced accuracy of pedicle screw placement at all spine levels but have not been assessed for ATPS. Methods. The anterior vertebrae of 9 fresh frozen cadaver cervical spines were exposed, preserving the lateral and posterior soft tissue envelope. Nine practicing spine surgeons placed 2.0-mm titanium anterior transpecidular Kirschner wires into the C3-T1 pedicles bilaterally using fluoroscopy or CAN guidance. Specimens were imaged by computed tomography and virtual screws were overlaid on the K-wires. Targeting accuracy was compared between the 2 techniques in all planes using a 5-level grading scale. Results. The percentage of acceptable screw placements for fluoroscopy and CAN was 42.6{\%} and 66.7{\%}, respectively (P = 0.012). Catastrophic screw placement (grade 3 or 4) was 33.3{\%} for fluoroscopy and 16.7{\%} for CAN. In the multivariable model, the accuracy rate was 67{\%} lower for fluoroscopy than for CAN after controlling for other factors (odds ratio: 0.33, 95{\%} confidence interval: 0.14-0.79). Conclusion. The accuracy of CAN-guided placement of K-wires for ATPS was superior to placement under fluoroscopic guidance, demonstrating statistically more acceptable screw placements and significantly less catastrophic virtual screws. However, malposition was still high, with potential for vertebral artery and neurological injury in a clinical setting. Further advancement in current ATPS techniques is warranted prior to widespread implementation in a patient setting. Level of Evidence: N/A.",
keywords = "anterior fixation, anterior transpedicular screws, cadaver study, catastrophic screw placement, cervical spine, computer-assisted navigation, fluoroscopic guidance, global cervical instability, pedicle screws, targeting accuracy",
author = "Patton, {Andrew G.} and Morris, {Randal P.} and Kuo, {Yong Fang} and Ronald Lindsey",
year = "2015",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/BRS.0000000000000786",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "E404--E410",
journal = "Spine",
issn = "0362-2436",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accuracy of Fluoroscopy Versus Computer-Assisted Navigation for the Placement of Anterior Cervical Pedicle Screws

AU - Patton, Andrew G.

AU - Morris, Randal P.

AU - Kuo, Yong Fang

AU - Lindsey, Ronald

PY - 2015/4/1

Y1 - 2015/4/1

N2 - Study Design. Randomized laboratory cadaver study. Objective. The objective of this study was to determine the accuracy of anterior transpedicular screw placement in the cervical spine using conventional fluoroscopy versus computer-assisted navigation. Summary of Background Data. Traditionally, global cervical instability has required anterior and posterior fixation due to the superior biomechanical stability of circumferential constructs. Anterior transpedicular screws (ATPS) have recently been advocated as a single surgical approach. Current clinical publications report using fluoroscopic guidance for screw placement. Computer-assisted navigation (CAN) systems have demonstrated enhanced accuracy of pedicle screw placement at all spine levels but have not been assessed for ATPS. Methods. The anterior vertebrae of 9 fresh frozen cadaver cervical spines were exposed, preserving the lateral and posterior soft tissue envelope. Nine practicing spine surgeons placed 2.0-mm titanium anterior transpecidular Kirschner wires into the C3-T1 pedicles bilaterally using fluoroscopy or CAN guidance. Specimens were imaged by computed tomography and virtual screws were overlaid on the K-wires. Targeting accuracy was compared between the 2 techniques in all planes using a 5-level grading scale. Results. The percentage of acceptable screw placements for fluoroscopy and CAN was 42.6% and 66.7%, respectively (P = 0.012). Catastrophic screw placement (grade 3 or 4) was 33.3% for fluoroscopy and 16.7% for CAN. In the multivariable model, the accuracy rate was 67% lower for fluoroscopy than for CAN after controlling for other factors (odds ratio: 0.33, 95% confidence interval: 0.14-0.79). Conclusion. The accuracy of CAN-guided placement of K-wires for ATPS was superior to placement under fluoroscopic guidance, demonstrating statistically more acceptable screw placements and significantly less catastrophic virtual screws. However, malposition was still high, with potential for vertebral artery and neurological injury in a clinical setting. Further advancement in current ATPS techniques is warranted prior to widespread implementation in a patient setting. Level of Evidence: N/A.

AB - Study Design. Randomized laboratory cadaver study. Objective. The objective of this study was to determine the accuracy of anterior transpedicular screw placement in the cervical spine using conventional fluoroscopy versus computer-assisted navigation. Summary of Background Data. Traditionally, global cervical instability has required anterior and posterior fixation due to the superior biomechanical stability of circumferential constructs. Anterior transpedicular screws (ATPS) have recently been advocated as a single surgical approach. Current clinical publications report using fluoroscopic guidance for screw placement. Computer-assisted navigation (CAN) systems have demonstrated enhanced accuracy of pedicle screw placement at all spine levels but have not been assessed for ATPS. Methods. The anterior vertebrae of 9 fresh frozen cadaver cervical spines were exposed, preserving the lateral and posterior soft tissue envelope. Nine practicing spine surgeons placed 2.0-mm titanium anterior transpecidular Kirschner wires into the C3-T1 pedicles bilaterally using fluoroscopy or CAN guidance. Specimens were imaged by computed tomography and virtual screws were overlaid on the K-wires. Targeting accuracy was compared between the 2 techniques in all planes using a 5-level grading scale. Results. The percentage of acceptable screw placements for fluoroscopy and CAN was 42.6% and 66.7%, respectively (P = 0.012). Catastrophic screw placement (grade 3 or 4) was 33.3% for fluoroscopy and 16.7% for CAN. In the multivariable model, the accuracy rate was 67% lower for fluoroscopy than for CAN after controlling for other factors (odds ratio: 0.33, 95% confidence interval: 0.14-0.79). Conclusion. The accuracy of CAN-guided placement of K-wires for ATPS was superior to placement under fluoroscopic guidance, demonstrating statistically more acceptable screw placements and significantly less catastrophic virtual screws. However, malposition was still high, with potential for vertebral artery and neurological injury in a clinical setting. Further advancement in current ATPS techniques is warranted prior to widespread implementation in a patient setting. Level of Evidence: N/A.

KW - anterior fixation

KW - anterior transpedicular screws

KW - cadaver study

KW - catastrophic screw placement

KW - cervical spine

KW - computer-assisted navigation

KW - fluoroscopic guidance

KW - global cervical instability

KW - pedicle screws

KW - targeting accuracy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84958109177&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84958109177&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000786

DO - 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000786

M3 - Article

C2 - 25599290

AN - SCOPUS:84958109177

VL - 40

SP - E404-E410

JO - Spine

JF - Spine

SN - 0362-2436

IS - 7

ER -