Adoption of the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system in peer-reviewed literature

Tristi W. Muir, Kevin J. Stepp, Matthew D. Barber, Ralph Chesson

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    48 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the method of describing pelvic organ prolapse in the peer-reviewed literature since the introduction of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System (POPQ). STUDY DESIGN: Representative US and international gynecology and urology journals were selected for review. All prolapse or urinary incontinence articles published in these journals from January to December of 1999 (period 1) and July 2001 to June 2002 (period 2) were hand searched by two independent reviewers. Systems for grading the severity of pelvic organ prolapse were separated into the following categories: POPQ, Baden-Walker system, Beecham system, grade without reference, or nonstandardized system. Chi-square and Fisher exact tests were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: A prolapse staging system was not referenced, or a nonstandardized staging system was used in 54.8% of studies. Overall, the POPQ system was the most common system used (22.6%), followed by the Baden-Walker system (19.8%). There was a statistically significant increase in the use of POPQ from period 1 (13.3%) to period 2 (28%) (P = .03). Articles published in gynecology journals were more likely to use the POPQ system than those published in urology journals (29% vs. 14%, P = .009). CONCLUSION: POPQ was the most common system used; however, the staging system was not cited or a nonstandardized staging system was used in more than half of studies.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)1632-1636
    Number of pages5
    JournalAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
    Volume189
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Dec 2003

    Fingerprint

    Pelvic Organ Prolapse
    Walkers
    Prolapse
    Urology
    Gynecology
    Urinary Incontinence

    Keywords

    • Pelvic organ prolapse
    • Pelvic organ prolapse quantification system
    • Prolapse description
    • Prolapse staging
    • Prolapse terminology

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Medicine(all)
    • Obstetrics and Gynecology

    Cite this

    Adoption of the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system in peer-reviewed literature. / Muir, Tristi W.; Stepp, Kevin J.; Barber, Matthew D.; Chesson, Ralph.

    In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 189, No. 6, 12.2003, p. 1632-1636.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Muir, Tristi W. ; Stepp, Kevin J. ; Barber, Matthew D. ; Chesson, Ralph. / Adoption of the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system in peer-reviewed literature. In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2003 ; Vol. 189, No. 6. pp. 1632-1636.
    @article{da94b9b7a8f5484081967d4f6deb82d1,
    title = "Adoption of the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system in peer-reviewed literature",
    abstract = "OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the method of describing pelvic organ prolapse in the peer-reviewed literature since the introduction of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System (POPQ). STUDY DESIGN: Representative US and international gynecology and urology journals were selected for review. All prolapse or urinary incontinence articles published in these journals from January to December of 1999 (period 1) and July 2001 to June 2002 (period 2) were hand searched by two independent reviewers. Systems for grading the severity of pelvic organ prolapse were separated into the following categories: POPQ, Baden-Walker system, Beecham system, grade without reference, or nonstandardized system. Chi-square and Fisher exact tests were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: A prolapse staging system was not referenced, or a nonstandardized staging system was used in 54.8{\%} of studies. Overall, the POPQ system was the most common system used (22.6{\%}), followed by the Baden-Walker system (19.8{\%}). There was a statistically significant increase in the use of POPQ from period 1 (13.3{\%}) to period 2 (28{\%}) (P = .03). Articles published in gynecology journals were more likely to use the POPQ system than those published in urology journals (29{\%} vs. 14{\%}, P = .009). CONCLUSION: POPQ was the most common system used; however, the staging system was not cited or a nonstandardized staging system was used in more than half of studies.",
    keywords = "Pelvic organ prolapse, Pelvic organ prolapse quantification system, Prolapse description, Prolapse staging, Prolapse terminology",
    author = "Muir, {Tristi W.} and Stepp, {Kevin J.} and Barber, {Matthew D.} and Ralph Chesson",
    year = "2003",
    month = "12",
    doi = "10.1016/j.ajog.2003.09.010",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "189",
    pages = "1632--1636",
    journal = "American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology",
    issn = "0002-9378",
    publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
    number = "6",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Adoption of the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system in peer-reviewed literature

    AU - Muir, Tristi W.

    AU - Stepp, Kevin J.

    AU - Barber, Matthew D.

    AU - Chesson, Ralph

    PY - 2003/12

    Y1 - 2003/12

    N2 - OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the method of describing pelvic organ prolapse in the peer-reviewed literature since the introduction of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System (POPQ). STUDY DESIGN: Representative US and international gynecology and urology journals were selected for review. All prolapse or urinary incontinence articles published in these journals from January to December of 1999 (period 1) and July 2001 to June 2002 (period 2) were hand searched by two independent reviewers. Systems for grading the severity of pelvic organ prolapse were separated into the following categories: POPQ, Baden-Walker system, Beecham system, grade without reference, or nonstandardized system. Chi-square and Fisher exact tests were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: A prolapse staging system was not referenced, or a nonstandardized staging system was used in 54.8% of studies. Overall, the POPQ system was the most common system used (22.6%), followed by the Baden-Walker system (19.8%). There was a statistically significant increase in the use of POPQ from period 1 (13.3%) to period 2 (28%) (P = .03). Articles published in gynecology journals were more likely to use the POPQ system than those published in urology journals (29% vs. 14%, P = .009). CONCLUSION: POPQ was the most common system used; however, the staging system was not cited or a nonstandardized staging system was used in more than half of studies.

    AB - OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the method of describing pelvic organ prolapse in the peer-reviewed literature since the introduction of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System (POPQ). STUDY DESIGN: Representative US and international gynecology and urology journals were selected for review. All prolapse or urinary incontinence articles published in these journals from January to December of 1999 (period 1) and July 2001 to June 2002 (period 2) were hand searched by two independent reviewers. Systems for grading the severity of pelvic organ prolapse were separated into the following categories: POPQ, Baden-Walker system, Beecham system, grade without reference, or nonstandardized system. Chi-square and Fisher exact tests were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: A prolapse staging system was not referenced, or a nonstandardized staging system was used in 54.8% of studies. Overall, the POPQ system was the most common system used (22.6%), followed by the Baden-Walker system (19.8%). There was a statistically significant increase in the use of POPQ from period 1 (13.3%) to period 2 (28%) (P = .03). Articles published in gynecology journals were more likely to use the POPQ system than those published in urology journals (29% vs. 14%, P = .009). CONCLUSION: POPQ was the most common system used; however, the staging system was not cited or a nonstandardized staging system was used in more than half of studies.

    KW - Pelvic organ prolapse

    KW - Pelvic organ prolapse quantification system

    KW - Prolapse description

    KW - Prolapse staging

    KW - Prolapse terminology

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0346096652&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0346096652&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/j.ajog.2003.09.010

    DO - 10.1016/j.ajog.2003.09.010

    M3 - Article

    C2 - 14710089

    AN - SCOPUS:0346096652

    VL - 189

    SP - 1632

    EP - 1636

    JO - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

    JF - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

    SN - 0002-9378

    IS - 6

    ER -