Skip to main navigation
Skip to search
Skip to main content
UTMB Health Research Expert Profiles Home
Help & FAQ
Home
Experts
Departments
Equipment
Projects/Grants
Publications
Activities
Press/Media
Honors
Impacts
Search by expertise, name or affiliation
Advantages and Disadvantages of Using Small and Large Animals in Burn Research: Proceedings of the 2021 Research Special Interest Group
David M. Burmeister
, Dorothy M. Supp
, Richard A. Clark
, Edward E. Tredget
, Heather M. Powell
,
Perenlei Enkhbaatar
, Julia K. Bohannon
, Leopoldo C. Cancio
, David M. Hill
, Rachel M. Nygaard
Anesthesiology
Research output
:
Contribution to journal
›
Article
›
peer-review
12
Scopus citations
Overview
Fingerprint
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Advantages and Disadvantages of Using Small and Large Animals in Burn Research: Proceedings of the 2021 Research Special Interest Group'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Sort by
Weight
Alphabetically
Keyphrases
American Burn Association
33%
Anatomic
33%
Animal Species
33%
Bronchoscope
33%
Burn Care
33%
Burn Healing
33%
Burn Injury
33%
Burn Pathophysiology
33%
Burn Sepsis
33%
Clinical Tool
33%
Common Themes
33%
Expert Opinion
33%
Human Skin
33%
Inhalation Injury
66%
Large Airways
33%
Large Animal Model
100%
Large Mammals
100%
Ovine Model
33%
Pros-cons
33%
Rodent Models
33%
Scar
33%
Sepsis
33%
Small Animal
100%
Small Animal Model
66%
Special Interest Groups
100%
Swine
33%
Virtual Sessions
33%
Well-defined
33%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science
Burn
100%
Ovine Model
25%
Pathophysiology
25%
Scar Formation
25%
Sepsis
50%
Medicine and Dentistry
Bronchoscope
25%
Pathophysiology
25%
Scar Formation
25%
Sepsis
50%
Thermal Burn
100%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine
Pathophysiology
50%
Sepsis
100%