Afferent fibers in the ventral root

R. E. Coggeshall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The dorsal rhizotomy was one of the earliest operations used for the treatment of chronic, intractable, segmental pain. The theoretical basis underlying the use of this procedure was the law of separation of function of the spinal roots that implies, among other things, that sensory fibers are located in the dorsal root and motor fibers are located in the ventral roots. On this basis, it should be possible by cutting the appropriate dorsal roots to relieve pain for any particular part of the body at the cost of making that part of the body anesthetic. Unfortunately, however, the dorsal rhizotomy seems to have a relatively low success rate in that the pain is often not relieved or is relieved for a variable period of time and then returns. Many different reasons may account for these failures, but one reason that is not often considered is that the law of separation of function of the spinal roots may not be accurate. This is pertinent at the present time, because large numbers of ventral root afferent fibers have recently been discovered. This review summarizes the work, both old and new, on ventral root afferents with particular emphasis on possible clinical applications. In particular, it is pointed out that the ventral root afferent fibers are probably present in humans and, if so, they may be involved in explanations for the failure of dorsal rhizotomy to relieve chronic pain. If these fibers are important, then they can be removed by a dorsal root ganglionectomy, which would remove both the dorsal and ventral root afferent fibers, as opposed to a dorsal rhizotomy, which would remove only the dorsal root afferent fibers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)443-448
Number of pages6
JournalNeurosurgery
Volume4
Issue number5
StatePublished - 1979
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Spinal Nerve Roots
Rhizotomy
Human Body
Ganglionectomy
Pain
Intractable Pain
Chronic Pain
Anesthetics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Surgery

Cite this

Coggeshall, R. E. (1979). Afferent fibers in the ventral root. Neurosurgery, 4(5), 443-448.

Afferent fibers in the ventral root. / Coggeshall, R. E.

In: Neurosurgery, Vol. 4, No. 5, 1979, p. 443-448.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Coggeshall, RE 1979, 'Afferent fibers in the ventral root', Neurosurgery, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 443-448.
Coggeshall RE. Afferent fibers in the ventral root. Neurosurgery. 1979;4(5):443-448.
Coggeshall, R. E. / Afferent fibers in the ventral root. In: Neurosurgery. 1979 ; Vol. 4, No. 5. pp. 443-448.
@article{9f5c022bbb83408ba270c8bab23e3079,
title = "Afferent fibers in the ventral root",
abstract = "The dorsal rhizotomy was one of the earliest operations used for the treatment of chronic, intractable, segmental pain. The theoretical basis underlying the use of this procedure was the law of separation of function of the spinal roots that implies, among other things, that sensory fibers are located in the dorsal root and motor fibers are located in the ventral roots. On this basis, it should be possible by cutting the appropriate dorsal roots to relieve pain for any particular part of the body at the cost of making that part of the body anesthetic. Unfortunately, however, the dorsal rhizotomy seems to have a relatively low success rate in that the pain is often not relieved or is relieved for a variable period of time and then returns. Many different reasons may account for these failures, but one reason that is not often considered is that the law of separation of function of the spinal roots may not be accurate. This is pertinent at the present time, because large numbers of ventral root afferent fibers have recently been discovered. This review summarizes the work, both old and new, on ventral root afferents with particular emphasis on possible clinical applications. In particular, it is pointed out that the ventral root afferent fibers are probably present in humans and, if so, they may be involved in explanations for the failure of dorsal rhizotomy to relieve chronic pain. If these fibers are important, then they can be removed by a dorsal root ganglionectomy, which would remove both the dorsal and ventral root afferent fibers, as opposed to a dorsal rhizotomy, which would remove only the dorsal root afferent fibers.",
author = "Coggeshall, {R. E.}",
year = "1979",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "443--448",
journal = "Neurosurgery",
issn = "0148-396X",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Afferent fibers in the ventral root

AU - Coggeshall, R. E.

PY - 1979

Y1 - 1979

N2 - The dorsal rhizotomy was one of the earliest operations used for the treatment of chronic, intractable, segmental pain. The theoretical basis underlying the use of this procedure was the law of separation of function of the spinal roots that implies, among other things, that sensory fibers are located in the dorsal root and motor fibers are located in the ventral roots. On this basis, it should be possible by cutting the appropriate dorsal roots to relieve pain for any particular part of the body at the cost of making that part of the body anesthetic. Unfortunately, however, the dorsal rhizotomy seems to have a relatively low success rate in that the pain is often not relieved or is relieved for a variable period of time and then returns. Many different reasons may account for these failures, but one reason that is not often considered is that the law of separation of function of the spinal roots may not be accurate. This is pertinent at the present time, because large numbers of ventral root afferent fibers have recently been discovered. This review summarizes the work, both old and new, on ventral root afferents with particular emphasis on possible clinical applications. In particular, it is pointed out that the ventral root afferent fibers are probably present in humans and, if so, they may be involved in explanations for the failure of dorsal rhizotomy to relieve chronic pain. If these fibers are important, then they can be removed by a dorsal root ganglionectomy, which would remove both the dorsal and ventral root afferent fibers, as opposed to a dorsal rhizotomy, which would remove only the dorsal root afferent fibers.

AB - The dorsal rhizotomy was one of the earliest operations used for the treatment of chronic, intractable, segmental pain. The theoretical basis underlying the use of this procedure was the law of separation of function of the spinal roots that implies, among other things, that sensory fibers are located in the dorsal root and motor fibers are located in the ventral roots. On this basis, it should be possible by cutting the appropriate dorsal roots to relieve pain for any particular part of the body at the cost of making that part of the body anesthetic. Unfortunately, however, the dorsal rhizotomy seems to have a relatively low success rate in that the pain is often not relieved or is relieved for a variable period of time and then returns. Many different reasons may account for these failures, but one reason that is not often considered is that the law of separation of function of the spinal roots may not be accurate. This is pertinent at the present time, because large numbers of ventral root afferent fibers have recently been discovered. This review summarizes the work, both old and new, on ventral root afferents with particular emphasis on possible clinical applications. In particular, it is pointed out that the ventral root afferent fibers are probably present in humans and, if so, they may be involved in explanations for the failure of dorsal rhizotomy to relieve chronic pain. If these fibers are important, then they can be removed by a dorsal root ganglionectomy, which would remove both the dorsal and ventral root afferent fibers, as opposed to a dorsal rhizotomy, which would remove only the dorsal root afferent fibers.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0018744087&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0018744087&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 460573

AN - SCOPUS:0018744087

VL - 4

SP - 443

EP - 448

JO - Neurosurgery

JF - Neurosurgery

SN - 0148-396X

IS - 5

ER -