Aggressive respiratory treatment in myasthenic crisis

Hoe Chin Chua, Panayiotis N. Varelas, Jeff Natterman, Abutaher Yahia, John Ulatowski, Anish Bhardwaj, Michael A. Williams, Daniel F. Hanley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Introduction: Myasthenic patients in need for mechanical ventilation, often develop pneumonia or atelectasis. Although there are differences in the incidence of these complications among various institutions, there is no evidence that aggressive treatment shortens the course of the myasthenic crisis. We tried to quantify the severity of lung injury and aggressiveness of respiratory intervention in myasthenic patients admitted to the Neuro-Critical Care Unit (NCCU). Methods: We retrospectively identified all mechanically ventilated myasthenic patients admitted in our unit between 1990 and 1998. A novel respiratory intervention index (RID, comprising the use of suction, intermittent positive pressure breathing or bronchodilator treatments, sighs and chest physiotherapy represented the aggressiveness of the respiratory treatment. The RII was correlated with the lung injury score (LIS) (1), used as a measure of lung involvement and other respiratory variables. Results: Eighteen patients with 24 episodes of respiratory failure were identified. Our patients had less atelectasis and pneumonia than previously published series (2) (46% vs 91%), leading to shorter mechanical support and NCCU stay. Mean RII inversely correlated with forced vital capacity, but not with negative inspiratory force or LIS, although for the latter a trend was observed (P=0.07). Conclusions: This study defines a bench mark for both severity of pulmonary complications and intensity of respiratory therapy in the severe myasthenic patient with mechanical ventilatory compromise. Our results indicate that aggressive respiratory treatment should be used in myasthenic patients in crisis in order to diminish the risk for respiratory complications. These observations should be validated in a prospective study.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalCritical Care Medicine
Volume27
Issue number12 SUPPL.
StatePublished - 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Muscle Weakness
Lung Injury
Pulmonary Atelectasis
Critical Care
Therapeutics
Pneumonia
Intermittent Positive-Pressure Breathing
Respiratory Therapy
Lung
Bronchodilator Agents
Vital Capacity
Suction
Artificial Respiration
Respiratory Insufficiency
Thorax
Prospective Studies
Incidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Chua, H. C., Varelas, P. N., Natterman, J., Yahia, A., Ulatowski, J., Bhardwaj, A., ... Hanley, D. F. (1999). Aggressive respiratory treatment in myasthenic crisis. Critical Care Medicine, 27(12 SUPPL.).

Aggressive respiratory treatment in myasthenic crisis. / Chua, Hoe Chin; Varelas, Panayiotis N.; Natterman, Jeff; Yahia, Abutaher; Ulatowski, John; Bhardwaj, Anish; Williams, Michael A.; Hanley, Daniel F.

In: Critical Care Medicine, Vol. 27, No. 12 SUPPL., 1999.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chua, HC, Varelas, PN, Natterman, J, Yahia, A, Ulatowski, J, Bhardwaj, A, Williams, MA & Hanley, DF 1999, 'Aggressive respiratory treatment in myasthenic crisis', Critical Care Medicine, vol. 27, no. 12 SUPPL..
Chua HC, Varelas PN, Natterman J, Yahia A, Ulatowski J, Bhardwaj A et al. Aggressive respiratory treatment in myasthenic crisis. Critical Care Medicine. 1999;27(12 SUPPL.).
Chua, Hoe Chin ; Varelas, Panayiotis N. ; Natterman, Jeff ; Yahia, Abutaher ; Ulatowski, John ; Bhardwaj, Anish ; Williams, Michael A. ; Hanley, Daniel F. / Aggressive respiratory treatment in myasthenic crisis. In: Critical Care Medicine. 1999 ; Vol. 27, No. 12 SUPPL.
@article{9cc2e1a7955448f1b4883cb136edcaef,
title = "Aggressive respiratory treatment in myasthenic crisis",
abstract = "Introduction: Myasthenic patients in need for mechanical ventilation, often develop pneumonia or atelectasis. Although there are differences in the incidence of these complications among various institutions, there is no evidence that aggressive treatment shortens the course of the myasthenic crisis. We tried to quantify the severity of lung injury and aggressiveness of respiratory intervention in myasthenic patients admitted to the Neuro-Critical Care Unit (NCCU). Methods: We retrospectively identified all mechanically ventilated myasthenic patients admitted in our unit between 1990 and 1998. A novel respiratory intervention index (RID, comprising the use of suction, intermittent positive pressure breathing or bronchodilator treatments, sighs and chest physiotherapy represented the aggressiveness of the respiratory treatment. The RII was correlated with the lung injury score (LIS) (1), used as a measure of lung involvement and other respiratory variables. Results: Eighteen patients with 24 episodes of respiratory failure were identified. Our patients had less atelectasis and pneumonia than previously published series (2) (46{\%} vs 91{\%}), leading to shorter mechanical support and NCCU stay. Mean RII inversely correlated with forced vital capacity, but not with negative inspiratory force or LIS, although for the latter a trend was observed (P=0.07). Conclusions: This study defines a bench mark for both severity of pulmonary complications and intensity of respiratory therapy in the severe myasthenic patient with mechanical ventilatory compromise. Our results indicate that aggressive respiratory treatment should be used in myasthenic patients in crisis in order to diminish the risk for respiratory complications. These observations should be validated in a prospective study.",
author = "Chua, {Hoe Chin} and Varelas, {Panayiotis N.} and Jeff Natterman and Abutaher Yahia and John Ulatowski and Anish Bhardwaj and Williams, {Michael A.} and Hanley, {Daniel F.}",
year = "1999",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
journal = "Critical Care Medicine",
issn = "0090-3493",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "12 SUPPL.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Aggressive respiratory treatment in myasthenic crisis

AU - Chua, Hoe Chin

AU - Varelas, Panayiotis N.

AU - Natterman, Jeff

AU - Yahia, Abutaher

AU - Ulatowski, John

AU - Bhardwaj, Anish

AU - Williams, Michael A.

AU - Hanley, Daniel F.

PY - 1999

Y1 - 1999

N2 - Introduction: Myasthenic patients in need for mechanical ventilation, often develop pneumonia or atelectasis. Although there are differences in the incidence of these complications among various institutions, there is no evidence that aggressive treatment shortens the course of the myasthenic crisis. We tried to quantify the severity of lung injury and aggressiveness of respiratory intervention in myasthenic patients admitted to the Neuro-Critical Care Unit (NCCU). Methods: We retrospectively identified all mechanically ventilated myasthenic patients admitted in our unit between 1990 and 1998. A novel respiratory intervention index (RID, comprising the use of suction, intermittent positive pressure breathing or bronchodilator treatments, sighs and chest physiotherapy represented the aggressiveness of the respiratory treatment. The RII was correlated with the lung injury score (LIS) (1), used as a measure of lung involvement and other respiratory variables. Results: Eighteen patients with 24 episodes of respiratory failure were identified. Our patients had less atelectasis and pneumonia than previously published series (2) (46% vs 91%), leading to shorter mechanical support and NCCU stay. Mean RII inversely correlated with forced vital capacity, but not with negative inspiratory force or LIS, although for the latter a trend was observed (P=0.07). Conclusions: This study defines a bench mark for both severity of pulmonary complications and intensity of respiratory therapy in the severe myasthenic patient with mechanical ventilatory compromise. Our results indicate that aggressive respiratory treatment should be used in myasthenic patients in crisis in order to diminish the risk for respiratory complications. These observations should be validated in a prospective study.

AB - Introduction: Myasthenic patients in need for mechanical ventilation, often develop pneumonia or atelectasis. Although there are differences in the incidence of these complications among various institutions, there is no evidence that aggressive treatment shortens the course of the myasthenic crisis. We tried to quantify the severity of lung injury and aggressiveness of respiratory intervention in myasthenic patients admitted to the Neuro-Critical Care Unit (NCCU). Methods: We retrospectively identified all mechanically ventilated myasthenic patients admitted in our unit between 1990 and 1998. A novel respiratory intervention index (RID, comprising the use of suction, intermittent positive pressure breathing or bronchodilator treatments, sighs and chest physiotherapy represented the aggressiveness of the respiratory treatment. The RII was correlated with the lung injury score (LIS) (1), used as a measure of lung involvement and other respiratory variables. Results: Eighteen patients with 24 episodes of respiratory failure were identified. Our patients had less atelectasis and pneumonia than previously published series (2) (46% vs 91%), leading to shorter mechanical support and NCCU stay. Mean RII inversely correlated with forced vital capacity, but not with negative inspiratory force or LIS, although for the latter a trend was observed (P=0.07). Conclusions: This study defines a bench mark for both severity of pulmonary complications and intensity of respiratory therapy in the severe myasthenic patient with mechanical ventilatory compromise. Our results indicate that aggressive respiratory treatment should be used in myasthenic patients in crisis in order to diminish the risk for respiratory complications. These observations should be validated in a prospective study.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33750649834&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33750649834&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 27

JO - Critical Care Medicine

JF - Critical Care Medicine

SN - 0090-3493

IS - 12 SUPPL.

ER -