Agreement between spectral-domain and time-domain OCT for measuring RNFL thickness

Gianmarco Vizzeri, R. N. Weinreb, A. O. Gonzalez-Garcia, C. Bowd, F. A. Medeiros, P. A. Sample, L. M. Zangwill

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

138 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background/aims: To evaluate spectral-domain (SD) optical coherence tomography (OCT) reproducibility and assess the agreement between SD-OCT and Time-Domain (TD) OCT retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) measurements. Methods: Three Cirrus-SD-OCT scans and one Stratus-TD-OCT scan were obtained from Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma Study (DIGS) healthy participants and glaucoma patients on the same day. Repeatability was evaluated using Sw (within-subject standard deviation), CV (coefficient of variation) and ICC (intraclass correlation coefficient). Agreement was assessed using correlation and Bland-Altman plots. Results: 16 healthy participants (32 eyes) and 39 patients (78 eyes) were included. SD-OCT reproducibility was excellent in both groups. The CV and ICC for Average RNFL thickness were 1.5% and 0.96, respectively, in healthy eyes and 1.6% and 0.98, respectively, in patient eyes. Correlations between RNFL parameters were strong, particularly for average RNFL thickness (R2 = 0.92 in patient eyes). Bland-Altman plots showed good agreement between instruments, with better agreement for average RNFL thickness than for sectoral RNFL parameters (for example, at 90 μm average RNFL thickness, 95% limits of agreement were -13.1 to 0.9 for healthy eyes and -16.2 to -0.3 μm for patient eyes). Conclusions: SD-OCT measurements were highly repeatable in healthy and patient eyes. Although the agreement between instruments was good, TD-OCT provided thicker RNFL measurements than SD-OCT. Measurements with these instruments should not be considered interchangeable.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)775-781
Number of pages7
JournalBritish Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume93
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Optical Coherence Tomography
Nerve Fibers
Glaucoma
Healthy Volunteers

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Sensory Systems
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

Cite this

Vizzeri, G., Weinreb, R. N., Gonzalez-Garcia, A. O., Bowd, C., Medeiros, F. A., Sample, P. A., & Zangwill, L. M. (2009). Agreement between spectral-domain and time-domain OCT for measuring RNFL thickness. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 93(6), 775-781. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2008.150698

Agreement between spectral-domain and time-domain OCT for measuring RNFL thickness. / Vizzeri, Gianmarco; Weinreb, R. N.; Gonzalez-Garcia, A. O.; Bowd, C.; Medeiros, F. A.; Sample, P. A.; Zangwill, L. M.

In: British Journal of Ophthalmology, Vol. 93, No. 6, 06.2009, p. 775-781.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Vizzeri, G, Weinreb, RN, Gonzalez-Garcia, AO, Bowd, C, Medeiros, FA, Sample, PA & Zangwill, LM 2009, 'Agreement between spectral-domain and time-domain OCT for measuring RNFL thickness', British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 93, no. 6, pp. 775-781. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2008.150698
Vizzeri, Gianmarco ; Weinreb, R. N. ; Gonzalez-Garcia, A. O. ; Bowd, C. ; Medeiros, F. A. ; Sample, P. A. ; Zangwill, L. M. / Agreement between spectral-domain and time-domain OCT for measuring RNFL thickness. In: British Journal of Ophthalmology. 2009 ; Vol. 93, No. 6. pp. 775-781.
@article{cb60a175048e4fe6b6919f0839a7c8d9,
title = "Agreement between spectral-domain and time-domain OCT for measuring RNFL thickness",
abstract = "Background/aims: To evaluate spectral-domain (SD) optical coherence tomography (OCT) reproducibility and assess the agreement between SD-OCT and Time-Domain (TD) OCT retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) measurements. Methods: Three Cirrus-SD-OCT scans and one Stratus-TD-OCT scan were obtained from Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma Study (DIGS) healthy participants and glaucoma patients on the same day. Repeatability was evaluated using Sw (within-subject standard deviation), CV (coefficient of variation) and ICC (intraclass correlation coefficient). Agreement was assessed using correlation and Bland-Altman plots. Results: 16 healthy participants (32 eyes) and 39 patients (78 eyes) were included. SD-OCT reproducibility was excellent in both groups. The CV and ICC for Average RNFL thickness were 1.5{\%} and 0.96, respectively, in healthy eyes and 1.6{\%} and 0.98, respectively, in patient eyes. Correlations between RNFL parameters were strong, particularly for average RNFL thickness (R2 = 0.92 in patient eyes). Bland-Altman plots showed good agreement between instruments, with better agreement for average RNFL thickness than for sectoral RNFL parameters (for example, at 90 μm average RNFL thickness, 95{\%} limits of agreement were -13.1 to 0.9 for healthy eyes and -16.2 to -0.3 μm for patient eyes). Conclusions: SD-OCT measurements were highly repeatable in healthy and patient eyes. Although the agreement between instruments was good, TD-OCT provided thicker RNFL measurements than SD-OCT. Measurements with these instruments should not be considered interchangeable.",
author = "Gianmarco Vizzeri and Weinreb, {R. N.} and Gonzalez-Garcia, {A. O.} and C. Bowd and Medeiros, {F. A.} and Sample, {P. A.} and Zangwill, {L. M.}",
year = "2009",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1136/bjo.2008.150698",
language = "English",
volume = "93",
pages = "775--781",
journal = "British Journal of Ophthalmology",
issn = "0007-1161",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Agreement between spectral-domain and time-domain OCT for measuring RNFL thickness

AU - Vizzeri, Gianmarco

AU - Weinreb, R. N.

AU - Gonzalez-Garcia, A. O.

AU - Bowd, C.

AU - Medeiros, F. A.

AU - Sample, P. A.

AU - Zangwill, L. M.

PY - 2009/6

Y1 - 2009/6

N2 - Background/aims: To evaluate spectral-domain (SD) optical coherence tomography (OCT) reproducibility and assess the agreement between SD-OCT and Time-Domain (TD) OCT retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) measurements. Methods: Three Cirrus-SD-OCT scans and one Stratus-TD-OCT scan were obtained from Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma Study (DIGS) healthy participants and glaucoma patients on the same day. Repeatability was evaluated using Sw (within-subject standard deviation), CV (coefficient of variation) and ICC (intraclass correlation coefficient). Agreement was assessed using correlation and Bland-Altman plots. Results: 16 healthy participants (32 eyes) and 39 patients (78 eyes) were included. SD-OCT reproducibility was excellent in both groups. The CV and ICC for Average RNFL thickness were 1.5% and 0.96, respectively, in healthy eyes and 1.6% and 0.98, respectively, in patient eyes. Correlations between RNFL parameters were strong, particularly for average RNFL thickness (R2 = 0.92 in patient eyes). Bland-Altman plots showed good agreement between instruments, with better agreement for average RNFL thickness than for sectoral RNFL parameters (for example, at 90 μm average RNFL thickness, 95% limits of agreement were -13.1 to 0.9 for healthy eyes and -16.2 to -0.3 μm for patient eyes). Conclusions: SD-OCT measurements were highly repeatable in healthy and patient eyes. Although the agreement between instruments was good, TD-OCT provided thicker RNFL measurements than SD-OCT. Measurements with these instruments should not be considered interchangeable.

AB - Background/aims: To evaluate spectral-domain (SD) optical coherence tomography (OCT) reproducibility and assess the agreement between SD-OCT and Time-Domain (TD) OCT retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) measurements. Methods: Three Cirrus-SD-OCT scans and one Stratus-TD-OCT scan were obtained from Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma Study (DIGS) healthy participants and glaucoma patients on the same day. Repeatability was evaluated using Sw (within-subject standard deviation), CV (coefficient of variation) and ICC (intraclass correlation coefficient). Agreement was assessed using correlation and Bland-Altman plots. Results: 16 healthy participants (32 eyes) and 39 patients (78 eyes) were included. SD-OCT reproducibility was excellent in both groups. The CV and ICC for Average RNFL thickness were 1.5% and 0.96, respectively, in healthy eyes and 1.6% and 0.98, respectively, in patient eyes. Correlations between RNFL parameters were strong, particularly for average RNFL thickness (R2 = 0.92 in patient eyes). Bland-Altman plots showed good agreement between instruments, with better agreement for average RNFL thickness than for sectoral RNFL parameters (for example, at 90 μm average RNFL thickness, 95% limits of agreement were -13.1 to 0.9 for healthy eyes and -16.2 to -0.3 μm for patient eyes). Conclusions: SD-OCT measurements were highly repeatable in healthy and patient eyes. Although the agreement between instruments was good, TD-OCT provided thicker RNFL measurements than SD-OCT. Measurements with these instruments should not be considered interchangeable.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=61549112304&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=61549112304&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bjo.2008.150698

DO - 10.1136/bjo.2008.150698

M3 - Article

VL - 93

SP - 775

EP - 781

JO - British Journal of Ophthalmology

JF - British Journal of Ophthalmology

SN - 0007-1161

IS - 6

ER -