TY - JOUR
T1 - Aligning our actions with our words
T2 - A systematic review of gender and racial diversity in surgical subspecialties
AU - Lewis, Joshua E.
AU - Pride, Lornee C.
AU - Luk, Hannah G.
AU - Oyejide, Kafayat
AU - Wilson, Isha M.
AU - Tawiah, Winston E.
AU - Watkins, Cale M.
AU - Lee, Wei Chen
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024.
PY - 2024/1/1
Y1 - 2024/1/1
N2 - Introduction: Persistent racial and gender disparities are prevalent within the higher education and medical training system, notably seen in the underrepresentation of Hispanic or Latinos, Black Americans, and female surgeons compared to their respective population proportions. This study aims to quantify publications addressing ethnic or gender diversity across various surgical specialties, analyze publication trends, and explore specific topics within medical literature. Database: The Database includes PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus Methods: Employing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), we conducted a systematic literature review utilizing the PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus databases. A broad inclusion criterion for both ethnic and gender diversity of plastic surgery, neurosurgery, otolaryngology, dermatology, orthopedic surgery, and gender surgery was utilized. The literature was selected between 2014 and 2024. In the content of our study, diversity in articles was defined as any article that focused on addressing gender or racial/ethnicity in the subspecialty. Results: Of 1529 initially screened articles, 346 were included. Orthopedic surgery had the most diversity publications (n = 86), followed by general surgery (n = 67) and plastic surgery (n = 51). Significant increases in diversity publications were observed across all specialties. Orthopedic surgery showed the highest growth (+0.17 publications/year, p < 0.001), followed by plastic surgery (+0.12, p = 0.002) and general surgery (+0.11, p = 0.003). Race/ethnicity was the primary focus (51.4%), with fewer articles on gender (19.7%) or both (28.9%). Diversity topics included demographics, pipeline/recruitment, application process, training experience, leadership, and workplace treatment. Conclusion: These insights underscore the importance of continued efforts to promote diversity within surgical specialties to enhance patient care and outcomes. Further research and initiatives are needed to ensure equitable representation in surgical fields. Addressing diversity issues in surgical specialties is essential for improving healthcare outcomes and reducing disparities.
AB - Introduction: Persistent racial and gender disparities are prevalent within the higher education and medical training system, notably seen in the underrepresentation of Hispanic or Latinos, Black Americans, and female surgeons compared to their respective population proportions. This study aims to quantify publications addressing ethnic or gender diversity across various surgical specialties, analyze publication trends, and explore specific topics within medical literature. Database: The Database includes PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus Methods: Employing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), we conducted a systematic literature review utilizing the PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus databases. A broad inclusion criterion for both ethnic and gender diversity of plastic surgery, neurosurgery, otolaryngology, dermatology, orthopedic surgery, and gender surgery was utilized. The literature was selected between 2014 and 2024. In the content of our study, diversity in articles was defined as any article that focused on addressing gender or racial/ethnicity in the subspecialty. Results: Of 1529 initially screened articles, 346 were included. Orthopedic surgery had the most diversity publications (n = 86), followed by general surgery (n = 67) and plastic surgery (n = 51). Significant increases in diversity publications were observed across all specialties. Orthopedic surgery showed the highest growth (+0.17 publications/year, p < 0.001), followed by plastic surgery (+0.12, p = 0.002) and general surgery (+0.11, p = 0.003). Race/ethnicity was the primary focus (51.4%), with fewer articles on gender (19.7%) or both (28.9%). Diversity topics included demographics, pipeline/recruitment, application process, training experience, leadership, and workplace treatment. Conclusion: These insights underscore the importance of continued efforts to promote diversity within surgical specialties to enhance patient care and outcomes. Further research and initiatives are needed to ensure equitable representation in surgical fields. Addressing diversity issues in surgical specialties is essential for improving healthcare outcomes and reducing disparities.
KW - Gender diversity
KW - healthcare disparities
KW - racial diversity
KW - subspecialty
KW - surgery
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85208790019&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85208790019&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/27550834241293022
DO - 10.1177/27550834241293022
M3 - Review article
C2 - 39493506
AN - SCOPUS:85208790019
SN - 2755-0834
VL - 8
JO - Journal of Medicine Access
JF - Journal of Medicine Access
ER -