An objective measure of clinical performance

Emil R. Petrusa, Thomas A. Blackwell, Linda P. Rogers, Christy Saydjari, Sharon Parcel, James C. Guckian

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

103 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Studies repeatedly have shown the clinical performance of students and residents to be less than expected by faculty. Because evaluation methods substantially influence education, poor performance can be improved with better clinical evaluation methods. This study evaluated a standardized method to measure clinical performance in which trained actual and simulated patients were organized in a multiplestation format for efficient testing of examinees on 17 cases in less than four hours. Specific checklists completed by patients and predetermined scoring protocols yielded reliable data and reduced faculty time. Data from 204 students in three clerkships were consistent with previous research showing case specificity and substantial case-to-case variability. As a group however, the students' overall total scores were very similar. This suggests that clinical education is inconsistent and that a profile of an examinee's performance is more accurate than a single overall score. Validity of this standardized clinical examination was supported by significant but moderate correlations with faculty ratings of ward performance and the medicine subtest of the National Board of Medical Examiners test, part II. Direct per-student costs were $21.00. This standardized objective examination of clinical skills is feasible for use in training programs and will provide reliable and valid data on clinical performance not available through typical methods.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)34-42
Number of pages9
JournalThe American Journal of Medicine
Volume83
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1987

Fingerprint

Students
Education
Coroners and Medical Examiners
Clinical Competence
Checklist
Medicine
Costs and Cost Analysis
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Petrusa, E. R., Blackwell, T. A., Rogers, L. P., Saydjari, C., Parcel, S., & Guckian, J. C. (1987). An objective measure of clinical performance. The American Journal of Medicine, 83(1), 34-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9343(87)90494-3

An objective measure of clinical performance. / Petrusa, Emil R.; Blackwell, Thomas A.; Rogers, Linda P.; Saydjari, Christy; Parcel, Sharon; Guckian, James C.

In: The American Journal of Medicine, Vol. 83, No. 1, 1987, p. 34-42.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Petrusa, ER, Blackwell, TA, Rogers, LP, Saydjari, C, Parcel, S & Guckian, JC 1987, 'An objective measure of clinical performance', The American Journal of Medicine, vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 34-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9343(87)90494-3
Petrusa ER, Blackwell TA, Rogers LP, Saydjari C, Parcel S, Guckian JC. An objective measure of clinical performance. The American Journal of Medicine. 1987;83(1):34-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9343(87)90494-3
Petrusa, Emil R. ; Blackwell, Thomas A. ; Rogers, Linda P. ; Saydjari, Christy ; Parcel, Sharon ; Guckian, James C. / An objective measure of clinical performance. In: The American Journal of Medicine. 1987 ; Vol. 83, No. 1. pp. 34-42.
@article{b2bb52a7e8e34b87a47dcb46e9378dce,
title = "An objective measure of clinical performance",
abstract = "Studies repeatedly have shown the clinical performance of students and residents to be less than expected by faculty. Because evaluation methods substantially influence education, poor performance can be improved with better clinical evaluation methods. This study evaluated a standardized method to measure clinical performance in which trained actual and simulated patients were organized in a multiplestation format for efficient testing of examinees on 17 cases in less than four hours. Specific checklists completed by patients and predetermined scoring protocols yielded reliable data and reduced faculty time. Data from 204 students in three clerkships were consistent with previous research showing case specificity and substantial case-to-case variability. As a group however, the students' overall total scores were very similar. This suggests that clinical education is inconsistent and that a profile of an examinee's performance is more accurate than a single overall score. Validity of this standardized clinical examination was supported by significant but moderate correlations with faculty ratings of ward performance and the medicine subtest of the National Board of Medical Examiners test, part II. Direct per-student costs were $21.00. This standardized objective examination of clinical skills is feasible for use in training programs and will provide reliable and valid data on clinical performance not available through typical methods.",
author = "Petrusa, {Emil R.} and Blackwell, {Thomas A.} and Rogers, {Linda P.} and Christy Saydjari and Sharon Parcel and Guckian, {James C.}",
year = "1987",
doi = "10.1016/0002-9343(87)90494-3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "83",
pages = "34--42",
journal = "American Journal of Medicine",
issn = "0002-9343",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An objective measure of clinical performance

AU - Petrusa, Emil R.

AU - Blackwell, Thomas A.

AU - Rogers, Linda P.

AU - Saydjari, Christy

AU - Parcel, Sharon

AU - Guckian, James C.

PY - 1987

Y1 - 1987

N2 - Studies repeatedly have shown the clinical performance of students and residents to be less than expected by faculty. Because evaluation methods substantially influence education, poor performance can be improved with better clinical evaluation methods. This study evaluated a standardized method to measure clinical performance in which trained actual and simulated patients were organized in a multiplestation format for efficient testing of examinees on 17 cases in less than four hours. Specific checklists completed by patients and predetermined scoring protocols yielded reliable data and reduced faculty time. Data from 204 students in three clerkships were consistent with previous research showing case specificity and substantial case-to-case variability. As a group however, the students' overall total scores were very similar. This suggests that clinical education is inconsistent and that a profile of an examinee's performance is more accurate than a single overall score. Validity of this standardized clinical examination was supported by significant but moderate correlations with faculty ratings of ward performance and the medicine subtest of the National Board of Medical Examiners test, part II. Direct per-student costs were $21.00. This standardized objective examination of clinical skills is feasible for use in training programs and will provide reliable and valid data on clinical performance not available through typical methods.

AB - Studies repeatedly have shown the clinical performance of students and residents to be less than expected by faculty. Because evaluation methods substantially influence education, poor performance can be improved with better clinical evaluation methods. This study evaluated a standardized method to measure clinical performance in which trained actual and simulated patients were organized in a multiplestation format for efficient testing of examinees on 17 cases in less than four hours. Specific checklists completed by patients and predetermined scoring protocols yielded reliable data and reduced faculty time. Data from 204 students in three clerkships were consistent with previous research showing case specificity and substantial case-to-case variability. As a group however, the students' overall total scores were very similar. This suggests that clinical education is inconsistent and that a profile of an examinee's performance is more accurate than a single overall score. Validity of this standardized clinical examination was supported by significant but moderate correlations with faculty ratings of ward performance and the medicine subtest of the National Board of Medical Examiners test, part II. Direct per-student costs were $21.00. This standardized objective examination of clinical skills is feasible for use in training programs and will provide reliable and valid data on clinical performance not available through typical methods.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023614427&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0023614427&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0002-9343(87)90494-3

DO - 10.1016/0002-9343(87)90494-3

M3 - Article

C2 - 3605180

AN - SCOPUS:0023614427

VL - 83

SP - 34

EP - 42

JO - American Journal of Medicine

JF - American Journal of Medicine

SN - 0002-9343

IS - 1

ER -