Analysis of anaerobic blood cultures in burned patients

Jason A. Regules, Misty D. Carlson, Steven Wolf, Clinton K. Murray

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The utility of anaerobic blood culturing is often debated in the general population, but there is limited data on the modern incidence, microbiology, and utility of obtaining routine anaerobic blood cultures for burned patients. We performed a retrospective review of the burned patients electronic medical records database for all blood cultures drawn between January 1997 and September 2005. We assessed blood cultures for positivity, organisms identified, and growth in aerobic or anaerobic media. 85,103 blood culture sets were drawn, with 4059 sets from burned patients. Three hundred and forty-five single species events (619 total blood culture isolates) were noted in 240 burned patients. For burned patients, four isolates were obligate anaerobic bacteria (all Propionibacterium acnes). Anaerobic versus aerobic culture growth was recorded in 310 of 619 (50.1%) burned patient blood culture sets. 46 (13.5%) of the identified organisms, most of which were not obligate anaerobic bacteria, were identified from solely anaerobic media. The results of our study suggest that the detection of significant anaerobic bacteremia in burned patients is very rare and that anaerobic bottles are not needed in this population for that indication. However anaerobic blood cultures systems are also able to detect facultative and obligate aerobic bacteria; therefore, the deletion of the anaerobic culture medium may have deleterious clinical impact.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)561-564
Number of pages4
JournalBurns
Volume33
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Anaerobic Bacteria
Propionibacterium acnes
Aerobic Bacteria
Electronic Health Records
Growth
Bacteremia
Microbiology
Blood Culture
Population
Culture Media
Databases
Incidence

Keywords

  • Anaerobe
  • Bacteremia
  • Blood cultures
  • Burn patients

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine
  • Surgery

Cite this

Regules, J. A., Carlson, M. D., Wolf, S., & Murray, C. K. (2007). Analysis of anaerobic blood cultures in burned patients. Burns, 33(5), 561-564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2006.10.390

Analysis of anaerobic blood cultures in burned patients. / Regules, Jason A.; Carlson, Misty D.; Wolf, Steven; Murray, Clinton K.

In: Burns, Vol. 33, No. 5, 01.08.2007, p. 561-564.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Regules, JA, Carlson, MD, Wolf, S & Murray, CK 2007, 'Analysis of anaerobic blood cultures in burned patients', Burns, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 561-564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2006.10.390
Regules, Jason A. ; Carlson, Misty D. ; Wolf, Steven ; Murray, Clinton K. / Analysis of anaerobic blood cultures in burned patients. In: Burns. 2007 ; Vol. 33, No. 5. pp. 561-564.
@article{dedaa8fc86514dbcaddea24135e4bbb9,
title = "Analysis of anaerobic blood cultures in burned patients",
abstract = "The utility of anaerobic blood culturing is often debated in the general population, but there is limited data on the modern incidence, microbiology, and utility of obtaining routine anaerobic blood cultures for burned patients. We performed a retrospective review of the burned patients electronic medical records database for all blood cultures drawn between January 1997 and September 2005. We assessed blood cultures for positivity, organisms identified, and growth in aerobic or anaerobic media. 85,103 blood culture sets were drawn, with 4059 sets from burned patients. Three hundred and forty-five single species events (619 total blood culture isolates) were noted in 240 burned patients. For burned patients, four isolates were obligate anaerobic bacteria (all Propionibacterium acnes). Anaerobic versus aerobic culture growth was recorded in 310 of 619 (50.1{\%}) burned patient blood culture sets. 46 (13.5{\%}) of the identified organisms, most of which were not obligate anaerobic bacteria, were identified from solely anaerobic media. The results of our study suggest that the detection of significant anaerobic bacteremia in burned patients is very rare and that anaerobic bottles are not needed in this population for that indication. However anaerobic blood cultures systems are also able to detect facultative and obligate aerobic bacteria; therefore, the deletion of the anaerobic culture medium may have deleterious clinical impact.",
keywords = "Anaerobe, Bacteremia, Blood cultures, Burn patients",
author = "Regules, {Jason A.} and Carlson, {Misty D.} and Steven Wolf and Murray, {Clinton K.}",
year = "2007",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.burns.2006.10.390",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "561--564",
journal = "Burns",
issn = "0305-4179",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Analysis of anaerobic blood cultures in burned patients

AU - Regules, Jason A.

AU - Carlson, Misty D.

AU - Wolf, Steven

AU - Murray, Clinton K.

PY - 2007/8/1

Y1 - 2007/8/1

N2 - The utility of anaerobic blood culturing is often debated in the general population, but there is limited data on the modern incidence, microbiology, and utility of obtaining routine anaerobic blood cultures for burned patients. We performed a retrospective review of the burned patients electronic medical records database for all blood cultures drawn between January 1997 and September 2005. We assessed blood cultures for positivity, organisms identified, and growth in aerobic or anaerobic media. 85,103 blood culture sets were drawn, with 4059 sets from burned patients. Three hundred and forty-five single species events (619 total blood culture isolates) were noted in 240 burned patients. For burned patients, four isolates were obligate anaerobic bacteria (all Propionibacterium acnes). Anaerobic versus aerobic culture growth was recorded in 310 of 619 (50.1%) burned patient blood culture sets. 46 (13.5%) of the identified organisms, most of which were not obligate anaerobic bacteria, were identified from solely anaerobic media. The results of our study suggest that the detection of significant anaerobic bacteremia in burned patients is very rare and that anaerobic bottles are not needed in this population for that indication. However anaerobic blood cultures systems are also able to detect facultative and obligate aerobic bacteria; therefore, the deletion of the anaerobic culture medium may have deleterious clinical impact.

AB - The utility of anaerobic blood culturing is often debated in the general population, but there is limited data on the modern incidence, microbiology, and utility of obtaining routine anaerobic blood cultures for burned patients. We performed a retrospective review of the burned patients electronic medical records database for all blood cultures drawn between January 1997 and September 2005. We assessed blood cultures for positivity, organisms identified, and growth in aerobic or anaerobic media. 85,103 blood culture sets were drawn, with 4059 sets from burned patients. Three hundred and forty-five single species events (619 total blood culture isolates) were noted in 240 burned patients. For burned patients, four isolates were obligate anaerobic bacteria (all Propionibacterium acnes). Anaerobic versus aerobic culture growth was recorded in 310 of 619 (50.1%) burned patient blood culture sets. 46 (13.5%) of the identified organisms, most of which were not obligate anaerobic bacteria, were identified from solely anaerobic media. The results of our study suggest that the detection of significant anaerobic bacteremia in burned patients is very rare and that anaerobic bottles are not needed in this population for that indication. However anaerobic blood cultures systems are also able to detect facultative and obligate aerobic bacteria; therefore, the deletion of the anaerobic culture medium may have deleterious clinical impact.

KW - Anaerobe

KW - Bacteremia

KW - Blood cultures

KW - Burn patients

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34249937082&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34249937082&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.burns.2006.10.390

DO - 10.1016/j.burns.2006.10.390

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 561

EP - 564

JO - Burns

JF - Burns

SN - 0305-4179

IS - 5

ER -