Anatomical basis for an apparent paradox concerning conduction velocities of two identified axons in Aplysia

H. Pinsker, R. Feinstein, M. Sawada, R. Coggeshall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Larger axons usually have faster conduction velocities, lower thresholds, and larger extracellular action potentials than smaller axons. However, it has been shown that the largest fiber, R2, in the right pleurovisceral connective of the marine mollusc, Aplysia, has a higher threshold and a slower conduction velocity than does the smaller axon of cell R1, even though the amplitude of R2's spike is larger than R1's spike. One explanation of this apparent paradox is that the two axons have different ''intrinsic membrane and axoplasmic constants'' (Goldman, L. (1961), J. Cell Comp. Physiol. 57:185-191). However, the deep infolding of R2's axonal membrane suggested that differences in the shape of the two axons might also account for the paradox. Accordingly, we measured the conduction velocities of the two axons and then examined the same axons in the electron microscope in order to measure their volumes and surface areas. Our morphological observations indicate that the extensive infolding of surface membrane causes R2 to have a smaller volume to surface area ratio than R1. Thus, since conduction velocity is proportional to the square root of the volume to surface area ratio (Hodgkin, A. L. (1954), J. Physiol. 125: 221-224), it is predictable that the smaller axon would have a faster conduction velocity. The results suggest that the paradoxical conduction velocities can be explained largely as resulting from differences in the shapes of the two axons. However, certain discrepancies between the measured and the predicted values suggest that other factors are contributing as well.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)241-253
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Neurobiology
Volume7
Issue number3
StatePublished - 1976

Fingerprint

Aplysia
Axons
Membranes
Mollusca
Hodgkin Disease
Action Potentials
Electrons

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Anatomical basis for an apparent paradox concerning conduction velocities of two identified axons in Aplysia. / Pinsker, H.; Feinstein, R.; Sawada, M.; Coggeshall, R.

In: Journal of Neurobiology, Vol. 7, No. 3, 1976, p. 241-253.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pinsker, H, Feinstein, R, Sawada, M & Coggeshall, R 1976, 'Anatomical basis for an apparent paradox concerning conduction velocities of two identified axons in Aplysia', Journal of Neurobiology, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 241-253.
Pinsker, H. ; Feinstein, R. ; Sawada, M. ; Coggeshall, R. / Anatomical basis for an apparent paradox concerning conduction velocities of two identified axons in Aplysia. In: Journal of Neurobiology. 1976 ; Vol. 7, No. 3. pp. 241-253.
@article{6a7a023a84334f48a2c0428c6d1521a8,
title = "Anatomical basis for an apparent paradox concerning conduction velocities of two identified axons in Aplysia",
abstract = "Larger axons usually have faster conduction velocities, lower thresholds, and larger extracellular action potentials than smaller axons. However, it has been shown that the largest fiber, R2, in the right pleurovisceral connective of the marine mollusc, Aplysia, has a higher threshold and a slower conduction velocity than does the smaller axon of cell R1, even though the amplitude of R2's spike is larger than R1's spike. One explanation of this apparent paradox is that the two axons have different ''intrinsic membrane and axoplasmic constants'' (Goldman, L. (1961), J. Cell Comp. Physiol. 57:185-191). However, the deep infolding of R2's axonal membrane suggested that differences in the shape of the two axons might also account for the paradox. Accordingly, we measured the conduction velocities of the two axons and then examined the same axons in the electron microscope in order to measure their volumes and surface areas. Our morphological observations indicate that the extensive infolding of surface membrane causes R2 to have a smaller volume to surface area ratio than R1. Thus, since conduction velocity is proportional to the square root of the volume to surface area ratio (Hodgkin, A. L. (1954), J. Physiol. 125: 221-224), it is predictable that the smaller axon would have a faster conduction velocity. The results suggest that the paradoxical conduction velocities can be explained largely as resulting from differences in the shapes of the two axons. However, certain discrepancies between the measured and the predicted values suggest that other factors are contributing as well.",
author = "H. Pinsker and R. Feinstein and M. Sawada and R. Coggeshall",
year = "1976",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "241--253",
journal = "Developmental Neurobiology",
issn = "1932-8451",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Anatomical basis for an apparent paradox concerning conduction velocities of two identified axons in Aplysia

AU - Pinsker, H.

AU - Feinstein, R.

AU - Sawada, M.

AU - Coggeshall, R.

PY - 1976

Y1 - 1976

N2 - Larger axons usually have faster conduction velocities, lower thresholds, and larger extracellular action potentials than smaller axons. However, it has been shown that the largest fiber, R2, in the right pleurovisceral connective of the marine mollusc, Aplysia, has a higher threshold and a slower conduction velocity than does the smaller axon of cell R1, even though the amplitude of R2's spike is larger than R1's spike. One explanation of this apparent paradox is that the two axons have different ''intrinsic membrane and axoplasmic constants'' (Goldman, L. (1961), J. Cell Comp. Physiol. 57:185-191). However, the deep infolding of R2's axonal membrane suggested that differences in the shape of the two axons might also account for the paradox. Accordingly, we measured the conduction velocities of the two axons and then examined the same axons in the electron microscope in order to measure their volumes and surface areas. Our morphological observations indicate that the extensive infolding of surface membrane causes R2 to have a smaller volume to surface area ratio than R1. Thus, since conduction velocity is proportional to the square root of the volume to surface area ratio (Hodgkin, A. L. (1954), J. Physiol. 125: 221-224), it is predictable that the smaller axon would have a faster conduction velocity. The results suggest that the paradoxical conduction velocities can be explained largely as resulting from differences in the shapes of the two axons. However, certain discrepancies between the measured and the predicted values suggest that other factors are contributing as well.

AB - Larger axons usually have faster conduction velocities, lower thresholds, and larger extracellular action potentials than smaller axons. However, it has been shown that the largest fiber, R2, in the right pleurovisceral connective of the marine mollusc, Aplysia, has a higher threshold and a slower conduction velocity than does the smaller axon of cell R1, even though the amplitude of R2's spike is larger than R1's spike. One explanation of this apparent paradox is that the two axons have different ''intrinsic membrane and axoplasmic constants'' (Goldman, L. (1961), J. Cell Comp. Physiol. 57:185-191). However, the deep infolding of R2's axonal membrane suggested that differences in the shape of the two axons might also account for the paradox. Accordingly, we measured the conduction velocities of the two axons and then examined the same axons in the electron microscope in order to measure their volumes and surface areas. Our morphological observations indicate that the extensive infolding of surface membrane causes R2 to have a smaller volume to surface area ratio than R1. Thus, since conduction velocity is proportional to the square root of the volume to surface area ratio (Hodgkin, A. L. (1954), J. Physiol. 125: 221-224), it is predictable that the smaller axon would have a faster conduction velocity. The results suggest that the paradoxical conduction velocities can be explained largely as resulting from differences in the shapes of the two axons. However, certain discrepancies between the measured and the predicted values suggest that other factors are contributing as well.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0017185679&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0017185679&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 241

EP - 253

JO - Developmental Neurobiology

JF - Developmental Neurobiology

SN - 1932-8451

IS - 3

ER -