Ancestry-independent fate specification and plasticity in the developmental timing of a typical Drosophila neuronal lineage

Ivana Gaziova, Krishna Moorthi Bhat

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the Drosophila CNS, combinatorial, interdependent, sequential genetic programs in neuroectodermal (NE) cells, prior to the formation of neuroblasts (NBs), determine the initial identity of NBs. Temporal factors are then sequentially expressed to change the temporal identity. It is unclear at what levels this positional and temporal information integrates to determine progeny cell identity. One idea is that this is a top-down linear process: the identity of a NB determines the identity of its daughter, the ganglion mother cell (GMC), the asymmetric division of the GMC and the fate specification of daughter cells of the GMC. Our results with midline (mid), which encodes a T-box protein, in a typical lineage, NB4→2rGMC→1rRP2/sib, suggest that at least part of the process operates in GMCs. That is, a GMC or a neuronal identity need not be determined at the NB or NE level. This is demonstrated by showing that Mid is expressed in a row 5 GMC (M-GMC), but not in its parent NB or NE cell. In mid mutants, M-GMC changes into GMC-1 and generates an RP2 and a sib without affecting the expression of key genes at the NE/NB levels. Expression of Mid in the M-GMC in mid mutants rescues the fate change, indicating that Mid specifies neurons at the GMC level. Moreover, we found a significant plasticity in the temporal window in which a neuronal lineage can develop. Although the extra GMC-1 in mid mutants is born -2 hours later than the bona fide GMC-1, it follows the same developmental pattern as the bona fide GMC-1. Thus, a GMC identity can be independent of parental identity and GMC formation and elaboration need not be strictly time-bound.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)263-274
Number of pages12
JournalDevelopment
Volume136
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 15 2009

Fingerprint

Ganglia
Drosophila
Stem Cells
Cell Division

Keywords

  • Ancestry
  • Drosophila
  • Midline
  • Neurogenesis
  • Transcription

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental Biology
  • Molecular Biology

Cite this

Ancestry-independent fate specification and plasticity in the developmental timing of a typical Drosophila neuronal lineage. / Gaziova, Ivana; Bhat, Krishna Moorthi.

In: Development, Vol. 136, No. 2, 15.01.2009, p. 263-274.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c235f5b35fb641f28796864c220ca2f3,
title = "Ancestry-independent fate specification and plasticity in the developmental timing of a typical Drosophila neuronal lineage",
abstract = "In the Drosophila CNS, combinatorial, interdependent, sequential genetic programs in neuroectodermal (NE) cells, prior to the formation of neuroblasts (NBs), determine the initial identity of NBs. Temporal factors are then sequentially expressed to change the temporal identity. It is unclear at what levels this positional and temporal information integrates to determine progeny cell identity. One idea is that this is a top-down linear process: the identity of a NB determines the identity of its daughter, the ganglion mother cell (GMC), the asymmetric division of the GMC and the fate specification of daughter cells of the GMC. Our results with midline (mid), which encodes a T-box protein, in a typical lineage, NB4→2rGMC→1rRP2/sib, suggest that at least part of the process operates in GMCs. That is, a GMC or a neuronal identity need not be determined at the NB or NE level. This is demonstrated by showing that Mid is expressed in a row 5 GMC (M-GMC), but not in its parent NB or NE cell. In mid mutants, M-GMC changes into GMC-1 and generates an RP2 and a sib without affecting the expression of key genes at the NE/NB levels. Expression of Mid in the M-GMC in mid mutants rescues the fate change, indicating that Mid specifies neurons at the GMC level. Moreover, we found a significant plasticity in the temporal window in which a neuronal lineage can develop. Although the extra GMC-1 in mid mutants is born -2 hours later than the bona fide GMC-1, it follows the same developmental pattern as the bona fide GMC-1. Thus, a GMC identity can be independent of parental identity and GMC formation and elaboration need not be strictly time-bound.",
keywords = "Ancestry, Drosophila, Midline, Neurogenesis, Transcription",
author = "Ivana Gaziova and Bhat, {Krishna Moorthi}",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1242/dev.027854",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "136",
pages = "263--274",
journal = "Development (Cambridge)",
issn = "0950-1991",
publisher = "Company of Biologists Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ancestry-independent fate specification and plasticity in the developmental timing of a typical Drosophila neuronal lineage

AU - Gaziova, Ivana

AU - Bhat, Krishna Moorthi

PY - 2009/1/15

Y1 - 2009/1/15

N2 - In the Drosophila CNS, combinatorial, interdependent, sequential genetic programs in neuroectodermal (NE) cells, prior to the formation of neuroblasts (NBs), determine the initial identity of NBs. Temporal factors are then sequentially expressed to change the temporal identity. It is unclear at what levels this positional and temporal information integrates to determine progeny cell identity. One idea is that this is a top-down linear process: the identity of a NB determines the identity of its daughter, the ganglion mother cell (GMC), the asymmetric division of the GMC and the fate specification of daughter cells of the GMC. Our results with midline (mid), which encodes a T-box protein, in a typical lineage, NB4→2rGMC→1rRP2/sib, suggest that at least part of the process operates in GMCs. That is, a GMC or a neuronal identity need not be determined at the NB or NE level. This is demonstrated by showing that Mid is expressed in a row 5 GMC (M-GMC), but not in its parent NB or NE cell. In mid mutants, M-GMC changes into GMC-1 and generates an RP2 and a sib without affecting the expression of key genes at the NE/NB levels. Expression of Mid in the M-GMC in mid mutants rescues the fate change, indicating that Mid specifies neurons at the GMC level. Moreover, we found a significant plasticity in the temporal window in which a neuronal lineage can develop. Although the extra GMC-1 in mid mutants is born -2 hours later than the bona fide GMC-1, it follows the same developmental pattern as the bona fide GMC-1. Thus, a GMC identity can be independent of parental identity and GMC formation and elaboration need not be strictly time-bound.

AB - In the Drosophila CNS, combinatorial, interdependent, sequential genetic programs in neuroectodermal (NE) cells, prior to the formation of neuroblasts (NBs), determine the initial identity of NBs. Temporal factors are then sequentially expressed to change the temporal identity. It is unclear at what levels this positional and temporal information integrates to determine progeny cell identity. One idea is that this is a top-down linear process: the identity of a NB determines the identity of its daughter, the ganglion mother cell (GMC), the asymmetric division of the GMC and the fate specification of daughter cells of the GMC. Our results with midline (mid), which encodes a T-box protein, in a typical lineage, NB4→2rGMC→1rRP2/sib, suggest that at least part of the process operates in GMCs. That is, a GMC or a neuronal identity need not be determined at the NB or NE level. This is demonstrated by showing that Mid is expressed in a row 5 GMC (M-GMC), but not in its parent NB or NE cell. In mid mutants, M-GMC changes into GMC-1 and generates an RP2 and a sib without affecting the expression of key genes at the NE/NB levels. Expression of Mid in the M-GMC in mid mutants rescues the fate change, indicating that Mid specifies neurons at the GMC level. Moreover, we found a significant plasticity in the temporal window in which a neuronal lineage can develop. Although the extra GMC-1 in mid mutants is born -2 hours later than the bona fide GMC-1, it follows the same developmental pattern as the bona fide GMC-1. Thus, a GMC identity can be independent of parental identity and GMC formation and elaboration need not be strictly time-bound.

KW - Ancestry

KW - Drosophila

KW - Midline

KW - Neurogenesis

KW - Transcription

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=62349141759&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=62349141759&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1242/dev.027854

DO - 10.1242/dev.027854

M3 - Article

C2 - 19088087

AN - SCOPUS:62349141759

VL - 136

SP - 263

EP - 274

JO - Development (Cambridge)

JF - Development (Cambridge)

SN - 0950-1991

IS - 2

ER -