TY - JOUR
T1 - Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Liver Transplantation
T2 - Immuno-Pathological Characteristics and Long-Term Follow-Up
AU - Cicalese, Luca
AU - Walton, Zachary C.
AU - Du, Xiaotang
AU - Kulkarni, Rupak
AU - Qiu, Suimin
AU - El Hag, Mohamed
AU - Stevenson, Heather L.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2024 Cicalese, Walton, Du, Kulkarni, Qiu, El Hag and Stevenson.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - The diagnosis of liver antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is challenging and likely under-recognized. The association of AMR with donor-specific antibodies (DSA), and its clinical course in relation to pathologic findings and treatment are ill defined. We identified cases of liver AMR by following the criteria outlined by the 2016 Banff Working Group. Patient demographics, native liver disease, histopathologic findings, treatment type, clinical outcome, and transaminase levels during AMR diagnosis, treatment, and resolution were determined. Patients (n = 8) with AMR average age was 55.2 years (range: 19–68). Seven of eight cases met the Banff criteria for AMR. Personalized treatment regimens consisted of optimization of immunosuppression, intravenous pulse steroids, plasmapheresis, IVIG, rituximab, and bortezomib. Five patients experienced complete resolution of AMR, return of transaminases to baseline, and decreased DSA at long-term follow-up. One patient developed chronic AMR and two patients required re-transplantation. Follow-up after AMR diagnosis ranged from one to 11 years. Because AMR can present at any time, crossmatch, early biopsy, and routine monitoring of DSA levels should be implemented following transaminase elevation to recognize AMR. Furthermore, treatment should be immediately implemented to reverse AMR and prevent graft failure, chronic damage, re-transplantation, and possibly mortality.
AB - The diagnosis of liver antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is challenging and likely under-recognized. The association of AMR with donor-specific antibodies (DSA), and its clinical course in relation to pathologic findings and treatment are ill defined. We identified cases of liver AMR by following the criteria outlined by the 2016 Banff Working Group. Patient demographics, native liver disease, histopathologic findings, treatment type, clinical outcome, and transaminase levels during AMR diagnosis, treatment, and resolution were determined. Patients (n = 8) with AMR average age was 55.2 years (range: 19–68). Seven of eight cases met the Banff criteria for AMR. Personalized treatment regimens consisted of optimization of immunosuppression, intravenous pulse steroids, plasmapheresis, IVIG, rituximab, and bortezomib. Five patients experienced complete resolution of AMR, return of transaminases to baseline, and decreased DSA at long-term follow-up. One patient developed chronic AMR and two patients required re-transplantation. Follow-up after AMR diagnosis ranged from one to 11 years. Because AMR can present at any time, crossmatch, early biopsy, and routine monitoring of DSA levels should be implemented following transaminase elevation to recognize AMR. Furthermore, treatment should be immediately implemented to reverse AMR and prevent graft failure, chronic damage, re-transplantation, and possibly mortality.
KW - AMR
KW - C4d
KW - DSA
KW - allograft
KW - rejection
KW - solid organ transplant
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85203807575&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85203807575&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/ti.2024.13232
DO - 10.3389/ti.2024.13232
M3 - Article
C2 - 39267618
AN - SCOPUS:85203807575
SN - 0934-0874
VL - 37
JO - Transplant International
JF - Transplant International
M1 - 13232
ER -