Antigen-capture enzyme immunoassay

A comparison with other methods for the detection of spotted fever group rickettsiae in ticks

S. Radulovic, H. M. Feng, P. Crocquet-Valdes, M. Morovic, B. Dzelalija, David Walker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To evaluate the prevalence of spotted fever group rickettsiae along the Adriatic Coast of Croatia, 832 ticks were examined by hemolymph test, direct immunofluorescence, antigen-capture enzyme immunoassay, and polymerase chain reaction. Very good agreement was observed among direct immunofluorescence, polymerase chain reaction, and antigen-capture enzyme immunoassay. Twelve ticks that were positive by hemolymph test and negative by both direct immunofluorescence and polymerase chain reaction presumably do not represent spotted fever group rickettsiae. By direct immunofluorescence, spotted fever group rickettsiae were present in 12% of Rhipicephalus bursa, 10.6% of Rh. sanguineus, and 7.8% of Dermacentor marginatus. From the 98 ticks containing rickettsia-like organisms by hemolymph test, seven spotted fever group rickettsial isolates were established in cell culture. Four isolates were identified as Rickettsia conorii. The antigen-capture enzyme immunoassay, which utilizes a monoclonal antibody to antigens of the 135-kD surface protein shared among many members of the spotted fever group, is recommended for primary screening of tick samples because it is reliable and yet less labor-intensive than the hemolymph and direct immunofluorescence tests. Although the polymerase chain reaction is too expensive for use as a screening method, it is recommended for confirmation of positive screening results. In addition to the technologic advance of the antigen-capture enzyme immunoassay, this study documented by contemporary methods that R. conorii is present along the eastern Adriatic Coast not only in the classic vector, Rh. sanguineus, but also in Rh. bursa and D. marginatus.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)359-364
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
Volume50
Issue number3
StatePublished - 1994

Fingerprint

Rickettsia
Direct Fluorescent Antibody Technique
Ticks
Immunoenzyme Techniques
Hemolymph
Fever
Antigens
Rickettsia conorii
Polymerase Chain Reaction
Dermacentor
Rhipicephalus
Croatia
Membrane Proteins
Cell Culture Techniques
Monoclonal Antibodies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Parasitology
  • Infectious Diseases

Cite this

Antigen-capture enzyme immunoassay : A comparison with other methods for the detection of spotted fever group rickettsiae in ticks. / Radulovic, S.; Feng, H. M.; Crocquet-Valdes, P.; Morovic, M.; Dzelalija, B.; Walker, David.

In: American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, Vol. 50, No. 3, 1994, p. 359-364.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e32d133dd1824487b446601e24ac970d,
title = "Antigen-capture enzyme immunoassay: A comparison with other methods for the detection of spotted fever group rickettsiae in ticks",
abstract = "To evaluate the prevalence of spotted fever group rickettsiae along the Adriatic Coast of Croatia, 832 ticks were examined by hemolymph test, direct immunofluorescence, antigen-capture enzyme immunoassay, and polymerase chain reaction. Very good agreement was observed among direct immunofluorescence, polymerase chain reaction, and antigen-capture enzyme immunoassay. Twelve ticks that were positive by hemolymph test and negative by both direct immunofluorescence and polymerase chain reaction presumably do not represent spotted fever group rickettsiae. By direct immunofluorescence, spotted fever group rickettsiae were present in 12{\%} of Rhipicephalus bursa, 10.6{\%} of Rh. sanguineus, and 7.8{\%} of Dermacentor marginatus. From the 98 ticks containing rickettsia-like organisms by hemolymph test, seven spotted fever group rickettsial isolates were established in cell culture. Four isolates were identified as Rickettsia conorii. The antigen-capture enzyme immunoassay, which utilizes a monoclonal antibody to antigens of the 135-kD surface protein shared among many members of the spotted fever group, is recommended for primary screening of tick samples because it is reliable and yet less labor-intensive than the hemolymph and direct immunofluorescence tests. Although the polymerase chain reaction is too expensive for use as a screening method, it is recommended for confirmation of positive screening results. In addition to the technologic advance of the antigen-capture enzyme immunoassay, this study documented by contemporary methods that R. conorii is present along the eastern Adriatic Coast not only in the classic vector, Rh. sanguineus, but also in Rh. bursa and D. marginatus.",
author = "S. Radulovic and Feng, {H. M.} and P. Crocquet-Valdes and M. Morovic and B. Dzelalija and David Walker",
year = "1994",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "50",
pages = "359--364",
journal = "American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene",
issn = "0002-9637",
publisher = "American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Antigen-capture enzyme immunoassay

T2 - A comparison with other methods for the detection of spotted fever group rickettsiae in ticks

AU - Radulovic, S.

AU - Feng, H. M.

AU - Crocquet-Valdes, P.

AU - Morovic, M.

AU - Dzelalija, B.

AU - Walker, David

PY - 1994

Y1 - 1994

N2 - To evaluate the prevalence of spotted fever group rickettsiae along the Adriatic Coast of Croatia, 832 ticks were examined by hemolymph test, direct immunofluorescence, antigen-capture enzyme immunoassay, and polymerase chain reaction. Very good agreement was observed among direct immunofluorescence, polymerase chain reaction, and antigen-capture enzyme immunoassay. Twelve ticks that were positive by hemolymph test and negative by both direct immunofluorescence and polymerase chain reaction presumably do not represent spotted fever group rickettsiae. By direct immunofluorescence, spotted fever group rickettsiae were present in 12% of Rhipicephalus bursa, 10.6% of Rh. sanguineus, and 7.8% of Dermacentor marginatus. From the 98 ticks containing rickettsia-like organisms by hemolymph test, seven spotted fever group rickettsial isolates were established in cell culture. Four isolates were identified as Rickettsia conorii. The antigen-capture enzyme immunoassay, which utilizes a monoclonal antibody to antigens of the 135-kD surface protein shared among many members of the spotted fever group, is recommended for primary screening of tick samples because it is reliable and yet less labor-intensive than the hemolymph and direct immunofluorescence tests. Although the polymerase chain reaction is too expensive for use as a screening method, it is recommended for confirmation of positive screening results. In addition to the technologic advance of the antigen-capture enzyme immunoassay, this study documented by contemporary methods that R. conorii is present along the eastern Adriatic Coast not only in the classic vector, Rh. sanguineus, but also in Rh. bursa and D. marginatus.

AB - To evaluate the prevalence of spotted fever group rickettsiae along the Adriatic Coast of Croatia, 832 ticks were examined by hemolymph test, direct immunofluorescence, antigen-capture enzyme immunoassay, and polymerase chain reaction. Very good agreement was observed among direct immunofluorescence, polymerase chain reaction, and antigen-capture enzyme immunoassay. Twelve ticks that were positive by hemolymph test and negative by both direct immunofluorescence and polymerase chain reaction presumably do not represent spotted fever group rickettsiae. By direct immunofluorescence, spotted fever group rickettsiae were present in 12% of Rhipicephalus bursa, 10.6% of Rh. sanguineus, and 7.8% of Dermacentor marginatus. From the 98 ticks containing rickettsia-like organisms by hemolymph test, seven spotted fever group rickettsial isolates were established in cell culture. Four isolates were identified as Rickettsia conorii. The antigen-capture enzyme immunoassay, which utilizes a monoclonal antibody to antigens of the 135-kD surface protein shared among many members of the spotted fever group, is recommended for primary screening of tick samples because it is reliable and yet less labor-intensive than the hemolymph and direct immunofluorescence tests. Although the polymerase chain reaction is too expensive for use as a screening method, it is recommended for confirmation of positive screening results. In addition to the technologic advance of the antigen-capture enzyme immunoassay, this study documented by contemporary methods that R. conorii is present along the eastern Adriatic Coast not only in the classic vector, Rh. sanguineus, but also in Rh. bursa and D. marginatus.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028199698&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028199698&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 50

SP - 359

EP - 364

JO - American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

JF - American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

SN - 0002-9637

IS - 3

ER -