TY - JOUR
T1 - Are Youth Sexting Rates Still on the Rise? A Meta-analytic Update
AU - Mori, Camille
AU - Park, Julianna
AU - Temple, Jeff R.
AU - Madigan, Sheri
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank Cheri Nickel, MLIS (University of Calgary), who conducted the literature search.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine
PY - 2022/4
Y1 - 2022/4
N2 - A meta-analysis of 39 studies (110,380 participants) from 2009 to 2015 indicated that youth sexting increased over time. To inform current practice and policy initiatives, this meta-analytic update of studies since 2016 examined if rates of youth sexting have continued to rise and whether youth sexting differs by age, sex, sexting methods, and geographical location. Electronic searches were conducted in March 2020 in Embase, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, and Web of Science, yielding 1,101 nonduplicate records. Studies were included if they provided prevalence of youth sexting and data collection occurred ≥2016. Literature review and data extraction were conducted by following established PRISMA guidelines. All relevant data were extracted by two independent reviewers. To calculate mean prevalence rates, random-effects meta-analyses were conducted. Twenty-eight studies (N = 48,024) met inclusion criteria. The estimated pooled prevalence rates were as follows: (1) sending (19.3%), (2) receiving (34.8%), and (3) forwarding sexts without consent (14.5%). These prevalence rates are statistically similar to studies with data collected before 2016. In recent studies, females receive sexts at a higher rate than males, older youth are more likely to send sexts, and younger and older adolescents receive sexts at similar rates. Youth sexting rates have likely plateaued. Sexting education initiatives should begin early and encourage safe, ethical, and respectful online behavior.
AB - A meta-analysis of 39 studies (110,380 participants) from 2009 to 2015 indicated that youth sexting increased over time. To inform current practice and policy initiatives, this meta-analytic update of studies since 2016 examined if rates of youth sexting have continued to rise and whether youth sexting differs by age, sex, sexting methods, and geographical location. Electronic searches were conducted in March 2020 in Embase, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, and Web of Science, yielding 1,101 nonduplicate records. Studies were included if they provided prevalence of youth sexting and data collection occurred ≥2016. Literature review and data extraction were conducted by following established PRISMA guidelines. All relevant data were extracted by two independent reviewers. To calculate mean prevalence rates, random-effects meta-analyses were conducted. Twenty-eight studies (N = 48,024) met inclusion criteria. The estimated pooled prevalence rates were as follows: (1) sending (19.3%), (2) receiving (34.8%), and (3) forwarding sexts without consent (14.5%). These prevalence rates are statistically similar to studies with data collected before 2016. In recent studies, females receive sexts at a higher rate than males, older youth are more likely to send sexts, and younger and older adolescents receive sexts at similar rates. Youth sexting rates have likely plateaued. Sexting education initiatives should begin early and encourage safe, ethical, and respectful online behavior.
KW - Adolescence
KW - Meta-analysis
KW - Sexting
KW - Sexuality
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85121128272&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85121128272&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2021.10.026
DO - 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2021.10.026
M3 - Review article
C2 - 34916123
AN - SCOPUS:85121128272
SN - 1054-139X
VL - 70
SP - 531
EP - 539
JO - Journal of Adolescent Health
JF - Journal of Adolescent Health
IS - 4
ER -