Abstract
In the current issue of Critical Care, Simon and coworkers investigated the effects of first-line arginine vasopressin (AVP) on organ function and systemic metabolism compared with norepinephrine in a pig model of fecal peritonitis. AVP was titrated according to the mean arterial pressure suggesting a vasopressor rather than a hormone replacement therapy. The study provides some evidence for the safety of this therapeutic approach. It needs to be determined whether AVP is most beneficial as a constant low-dose infusion to supplement norepinephrine or in higher doses than currently recommended to substitute norepinephrine. In addition, future studies are warranted to evaluate whether a first-line therapy of AVP is superior to a last-resort administration.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 178 |
| Number of pages | 1 |
| Journal | Critical care (London, England) |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs |
|
| State | Published - 2009 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Arginine vasopressin in septic shock: supplement or substitute for norepinephrine?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS