TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessing Association Between Team Structure and Health Outcome and Cost by Social Network Analysis
AU - Kuo, Yong Fang
AU - Agrawal, Pooja
AU - Chou, Lin Na
AU - Jupiter, Daniel
AU - Raji, Mukaila A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The American Geriatrics Society
PY - 2021/4
Y1 - 2021/4
N2 - Background/Objective: To assess the impact of team structure composition and degree of collaboration among various providers on process and outcomes of primary care. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Data from 20% randomly selected primary care service areas in the 2015 Medicare claims was used to identified primary care practices. Participants: 449,460 patients with diabetes, heart failure, or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease cared for by the identified primary care practices. Measurements: SNA network measures, including edge density, degree centralization, and betweenness centralization for each practice. Results: When compared to practices with MDs and nurse practitioners (NPs) or/and physicians assistants (PAs), the practices with MDs only had lower degree of centralization and higher MD-to-MD connectedness. Within the primary care practices comprising MDs, NPs or/and PAs, the non-physician providers were more connected (measured as edge density) to all providers in the practice but with higher degree of centralization compared to the MDs in the practice. After adjusting for patient characteristics and type of practice, higher edge density was associated with lower odds of hospitalization (odds ratio [OR]: 0.89, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.79–0.99), emergency department (ER) admission (OR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.70–0.92), and total spending (cost ratio [CR]: 0.86, standard error of the mean [SE]: 0.038). Conversely, higher degree centralization was associated with higher rates of hospitalization (OR: 1.15, 95% CI: 1.03–1.28), ER admission (OR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.08–1.40), and total spending (CR: 1.14, SE: 0.037). However, higher degree centralization was associated with lower rates of potentially inappropriate medications (OR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.81, 0.99). Team leadership by an NP versus an MD were similar in the rate of ER admissions, hospitalizations, or total spending. Conclusion: Our findings showed that highly connected primary care practices with high collaborative care and less top-down MD-centered authority have lower odds of hospitalization, fewer ER admissions, and less total spending; findings likely reflecting better communication and more coordinated care of older patients.
AB - Background/Objective: To assess the impact of team structure composition and degree of collaboration among various providers on process and outcomes of primary care. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Data from 20% randomly selected primary care service areas in the 2015 Medicare claims was used to identified primary care practices. Participants: 449,460 patients with diabetes, heart failure, or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease cared for by the identified primary care practices. Measurements: SNA network measures, including edge density, degree centralization, and betweenness centralization for each practice. Results: When compared to practices with MDs and nurse practitioners (NPs) or/and physicians assistants (PAs), the practices with MDs only had lower degree of centralization and higher MD-to-MD connectedness. Within the primary care practices comprising MDs, NPs or/and PAs, the non-physician providers were more connected (measured as edge density) to all providers in the practice but with higher degree of centralization compared to the MDs in the practice. After adjusting for patient characteristics and type of practice, higher edge density was associated with lower odds of hospitalization (odds ratio [OR]: 0.89, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.79–0.99), emergency department (ER) admission (OR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.70–0.92), and total spending (cost ratio [CR]: 0.86, standard error of the mean [SE]: 0.038). Conversely, higher degree centralization was associated with higher rates of hospitalization (OR: 1.15, 95% CI: 1.03–1.28), ER admission (OR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.08–1.40), and total spending (CR: 1.14, SE: 0.037). However, higher degree centralization was associated with lower rates of potentially inappropriate medications (OR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.81, 0.99). Team leadership by an NP versus an MD were similar in the rate of ER admissions, hospitalizations, or total spending. Conclusion: Our findings showed that highly connected primary care practices with high collaborative care and less top-down MD-centered authority have lower odds of hospitalization, fewer ER admissions, and less total spending; findings likely reflecting better communication and more coordinated care of older patients.
KW - Medicare
KW - nurse practitioners
KW - primary care
KW - social network analysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85096955159&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85096955159&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/jgs.16962
DO - 10.1111/jgs.16962
M3 - Article
C2 - 33289067
AN - SCOPUS:85096955159
SN - 0002-8614
VL - 69
SP - 946
EP - 954
JO - Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
JF - Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
IS - 4
ER -