Assessing the acceptability and usability of an interactive serious game in aiding treatment decisions for patients with localized prostate cancer

Lindsey Reichlin, Nithya Mani, Kara McArthur, Amy M. Harris, Nithin Rajan, Clifford C. Dacso

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

45 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Men diagnosed with localized prostate cancer face a potentially life-altering treatment decision that can be overwhelming. Enhancing patient knowledge through education can significantly reduce feelings of uncertainty while simultaneously increasing confidence in decision making. Serious games have been shown in other populations to increase health knowledge and assist with the health decision-making process. We developed an interactive serious game, Time After Time, which translates evidence-based treatment outcome data into an accessible and understandable format that men can utilize in their prostate cancer treatment decision-making process. The game specifically aims to raise men's awareness and understanding of the impact of health-related quality of life issues associated with the major treatment options and to enrich their conversations with their health care providers. Objective: This study determined the acceptability and usability of the alpha version of Time After Time, an interactive decision aid for men diagnosed with localized prostate cancer, in order to inform future iterations of the serious game. Methods: The study employed a mixed methods approach to assess the acceptability and usability of the Time After Time serious game using qualitative focus groups and a quantitative Likert scale survey. Results: A total of 13 men who had already completed treatment for localized prostate cancer completed the survey and participated in focus group meetings. The majority of the study participants rated Time After Time as an appropriate decision tool for localized prostate cancer and verified that it meets its goals of increasing focus on side effects and generating questions for the patient's health care team. However, participants also expressed concerns about game usability and the diversity of information covered regarding treatment options and potential treatment outcomes. Conclusions: Serious games are a promising approach to health education and decision support for older men. Participants were receptive to the idea of a serious game as a decision aid in localized prostate cancer. However, usability issues are a major concern for this demographic, as is clarity and transparency of data sources.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere4
JournalJournal of Medical Internet Research
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Prostatic Neoplasms
Decision Making
Patient Care Team
Decision Support Techniques
Therapeutics
Focus Groups
Group Processes
Information Storage and Retrieval
Health
Health Education
Health Personnel
Uncertainty
Emotions
Quality of Life
Demography
Education
Population

Keywords

  • Prostate cancer
  • Serious games
  • Shared decision-making
  • Usability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Informatics

Cite this

Assessing the acceptability and usability of an interactive serious game in aiding treatment decisions for patients with localized prostate cancer. / Reichlin, Lindsey; Mani, Nithya; McArthur, Kara; Harris, Amy M.; Rajan, Nithin; Dacso, Clifford C.

In: Journal of Medical Internet Research, Vol. 13, No. 1, e4, 01.2011.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Reichlin, Lindsey ; Mani, Nithya ; McArthur, Kara ; Harris, Amy M. ; Rajan, Nithin ; Dacso, Clifford C. / Assessing the acceptability and usability of an interactive serious game in aiding treatment decisions for patients with localized prostate cancer. In: Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2011 ; Vol. 13, No. 1.
@article{f0e4aff158a047778f1ad15d30d965ec,
title = "Assessing the acceptability and usability of an interactive serious game in aiding treatment decisions for patients with localized prostate cancer",
abstract = "Background: Men diagnosed with localized prostate cancer face a potentially life-altering treatment decision that can be overwhelming. Enhancing patient knowledge through education can significantly reduce feelings of uncertainty while simultaneously increasing confidence in decision making. Serious games have been shown in other populations to increase health knowledge and assist with the health decision-making process. We developed an interactive serious game, Time After Time, which translates evidence-based treatment outcome data into an accessible and understandable format that men can utilize in their prostate cancer treatment decision-making process. The game specifically aims to raise men's awareness and understanding of the impact of health-related quality of life issues associated with the major treatment options and to enrich their conversations with their health care providers. Objective: This study determined the acceptability and usability of the alpha version of Time After Time, an interactive decision aid for men diagnosed with localized prostate cancer, in order to inform future iterations of the serious game. Methods: The study employed a mixed methods approach to assess the acceptability and usability of the Time After Time serious game using qualitative focus groups and a quantitative Likert scale survey. Results: A total of 13 men who had already completed treatment for localized prostate cancer completed the survey and participated in focus group meetings. The majority of the study participants rated Time After Time as an appropriate decision tool for localized prostate cancer and verified that it meets its goals of increasing focus on side effects and generating questions for the patient's health care team. However, participants also expressed concerns about game usability and the diversity of information covered regarding treatment options and potential treatment outcomes. Conclusions: Serious games are a promising approach to health education and decision support for older men. Participants were receptive to the idea of a serious game as a decision aid in localized prostate cancer. However, usability issues are a major concern for this demographic, as is clarity and transparency of data sources.",
keywords = "Prostate cancer, Serious games, Shared decision-making, Usability",
author = "Lindsey Reichlin and Nithya Mani and Kara McArthur and Harris, {Amy M.} and Nithin Rajan and Dacso, {Clifford C.}",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
doi = "10.2196/jmir.1519",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
journal = "Journal of Medical Internet Research",
issn = "1439-4456",
publisher = "Journal of medical Internet Research",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing the acceptability and usability of an interactive serious game in aiding treatment decisions for patients with localized prostate cancer

AU - Reichlin, Lindsey

AU - Mani, Nithya

AU - McArthur, Kara

AU - Harris, Amy M.

AU - Rajan, Nithin

AU - Dacso, Clifford C.

PY - 2011/1

Y1 - 2011/1

N2 - Background: Men diagnosed with localized prostate cancer face a potentially life-altering treatment decision that can be overwhelming. Enhancing patient knowledge through education can significantly reduce feelings of uncertainty while simultaneously increasing confidence in decision making. Serious games have been shown in other populations to increase health knowledge and assist with the health decision-making process. We developed an interactive serious game, Time After Time, which translates evidence-based treatment outcome data into an accessible and understandable format that men can utilize in their prostate cancer treatment decision-making process. The game specifically aims to raise men's awareness and understanding of the impact of health-related quality of life issues associated with the major treatment options and to enrich their conversations with their health care providers. Objective: This study determined the acceptability and usability of the alpha version of Time After Time, an interactive decision aid for men diagnosed with localized prostate cancer, in order to inform future iterations of the serious game. Methods: The study employed a mixed methods approach to assess the acceptability and usability of the Time After Time serious game using qualitative focus groups and a quantitative Likert scale survey. Results: A total of 13 men who had already completed treatment for localized prostate cancer completed the survey and participated in focus group meetings. The majority of the study participants rated Time After Time as an appropriate decision tool for localized prostate cancer and verified that it meets its goals of increasing focus on side effects and generating questions for the patient's health care team. However, participants also expressed concerns about game usability and the diversity of information covered regarding treatment options and potential treatment outcomes. Conclusions: Serious games are a promising approach to health education and decision support for older men. Participants were receptive to the idea of a serious game as a decision aid in localized prostate cancer. However, usability issues are a major concern for this demographic, as is clarity and transparency of data sources.

AB - Background: Men diagnosed with localized prostate cancer face a potentially life-altering treatment decision that can be overwhelming. Enhancing patient knowledge through education can significantly reduce feelings of uncertainty while simultaneously increasing confidence in decision making. Serious games have been shown in other populations to increase health knowledge and assist with the health decision-making process. We developed an interactive serious game, Time After Time, which translates evidence-based treatment outcome data into an accessible and understandable format that men can utilize in their prostate cancer treatment decision-making process. The game specifically aims to raise men's awareness and understanding of the impact of health-related quality of life issues associated with the major treatment options and to enrich their conversations with their health care providers. Objective: This study determined the acceptability and usability of the alpha version of Time After Time, an interactive decision aid for men diagnosed with localized prostate cancer, in order to inform future iterations of the serious game. Methods: The study employed a mixed methods approach to assess the acceptability and usability of the Time After Time serious game using qualitative focus groups and a quantitative Likert scale survey. Results: A total of 13 men who had already completed treatment for localized prostate cancer completed the survey and participated in focus group meetings. The majority of the study participants rated Time After Time as an appropriate decision tool for localized prostate cancer and verified that it meets its goals of increasing focus on side effects and generating questions for the patient's health care team. However, participants also expressed concerns about game usability and the diversity of information covered regarding treatment options and potential treatment outcomes. Conclusions: Serious games are a promising approach to health education and decision support for older men. Participants were receptive to the idea of a serious game as a decision aid in localized prostate cancer. However, usability issues are a major concern for this demographic, as is clarity and transparency of data sources.

KW - Prostate cancer

KW - Serious games

KW - Shared decision-making

KW - Usability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79953119036&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79953119036&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2196/jmir.1519

DO - 10.2196/jmir.1519

M3 - Article

VL - 13

JO - Journal of Medical Internet Research

JF - Journal of Medical Internet Research

SN - 1439-4456

IS - 1

M1 - e4

ER -