Assessment of health conditions from patient electronic health record portals vs self-reported questionnaires: An analysis of the INSPIRE study

Rohan Khera, Mitsuaki Sawano, Frederick Warner, Andreas Coppi, Aline F. Pedroso, Erica S. Spatz, Huihui Yu, Michael Gottlieb, Sharon Saydah, Kari A. Stephens, Kristin L. Rising, Joann G. Elmore, Mandy J. Hill, Ahamed H. Idris, Juan Carlos C. Montoy, Kelli N. O'Laughlin, Robert A. Weinstein, Arjun Venkatesh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives: Direct electronic access to multiple electronic health record (EHR) systems through patient portals offers a novel avenue for decentralized research. Given the critical value of patient characterization, we sought to compare computable evaluation of health conditions from patient-portal EHR against the traditional self-report. Materials and Methods: In the nationwide Innovative Support for Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Infections Registry (INSPIRE) study, which linked self-reported questionnaires with multiplatform patient-portal EHR data, we compared self-reported health conditions across different clinical domains against computable definitions based on diagnosis codes, medications, vital signs, and laboratory testing. We assessed their concordance using Cohen's Kappa and the prognostic significance of differentially captured features as predictors of 1-year all-cause hospitalization risk. Results: Among 1683 participants (mean age 41 ± 15 years, 67% female, 63% non-Hispanic Whites), the prevalence of conditions varied substantially between EHR and self-report (-13.2% to +11.6% across definitions). Compared with comprehensive EHR phenotypes, self-report under-captured all conditions, including hypertension (27.9% vs 16.2%), diabetes (10.1% vs 6.2%), and heart disease (8.5% vs 4.3%). However, diagnosis codes alone were insufficient. The risk for 1-year hospitalization was better defined by the same features from patient-portal EHR (area under the receiver operating curve [AUROC] 0.79) than from self-report (AUROC 0.68). Discussion: EHR-derived computable phenotypes identified a higher prevalence of comorbidities than self-report, with prognostic value of additionally identified features. However, definitions based solely on diagnosis codes often undercaptured self-reported conditions, suggesting a role of broader EHR elements. Conclusion: In this nationwide study, patient-portal-derived EHR data enabled extensive capture of patient characteristics across multiple EHR platforms, allowing better disease phenotyping compared with self-report.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)784-794
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Volume32
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2025
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • decentralized
  • multicenter
  • patient portal
  • pragmatic studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Informatics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Assessment of health conditions from patient electronic health record portals vs self-reported questionnaires: An analysis of the INSPIRE study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this