Assessments of girls' genital findings and the likelihood of sexual abuse: Agreement among physicians self-rated as skilled

Jan E. Paradise, Martin A. Finkel, Alexa S. Beiser, Abbey Berenson, Donna B. Greenberg, Michael R. Winter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To measure agreement about genital examination findings among physicians who rate themselves as skilled in evaluating children for suspected sexual abuse, to compare these physicians' descriptions and interpretations with consensus standards developed by an expert panel, and to investigate the effects of physician and case characteristics on agreement. Study Design: Questionnaires including 7 simulated cases, each consisting of a brief history and 1 photograph of a girl's genitalia, were mailed to random samples of 2 groups: the members of 4 physician organizations concerned with child abuse or pediatric gynecology, and pediatricians at large. Among the surveyed physicians who rated their own skill in evaluating cases of suspected sexual abuse as higher than average, we measured agreement, both overall and between those with the, most and with less clinical experience, and assessed their conformity with consensus standard descriptions and interpretations. Results: We received responses from 548 (50.9%) of 1076 physicians; 414 responses (75.5%) were analyzable. Two hundred six physicians (50%) rated themselves as skilled in assessing children for sexual abuse. On average, 45% of these physicians' descriptions and 72.6% of their interpretations conformed with the consensus standards. In 4 cases, between 5% and 20.7% of these physicians described genital findings that the expert panel had considered; absent from the photographs. Conformity with standard interpretations tended to be higher in cases with photographs concordant with the accompanying, unambiguous histories (P=.06). The most experienced physicians resembled the expert panel more closely than did the less experienced self-rated skilled physicians in interpreting 3 simulated cases (P≤.001). Conclusions: Assessments of girls' genital findings by physicians who rate themselves as skilled in examining children for suspected sexual abuse often differ. In some cases, among physicians who all rate themselves as skilled, assessments made by very experienced physicians may conform more closely to consensus standards than do assessments made by less experienced physicians.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)883-891
Number of pages9
JournalArchives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine
Volume151
Issue number9
StatePublished - Sep 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Sex Offenses
Physicians
Sexual Child Abuse
Genitalia
Child Abuse
Gynecology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

Assessments of girls' genital findings and the likelihood of sexual abuse : Agreement among physicians self-rated as skilled. / Paradise, Jan E.; Finkel, Martin A.; Beiser, Alexa S.; Berenson, Abbey; Greenberg, Donna B.; Winter, Michael R.

In: Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Vol. 151, No. 9, 09.1997, p. 883-891.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Paradise, Jan E. ; Finkel, Martin A. ; Beiser, Alexa S. ; Berenson, Abbey ; Greenberg, Donna B. ; Winter, Michael R. / Assessments of girls' genital findings and the likelihood of sexual abuse : Agreement among physicians self-rated as skilled. In: Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine. 1997 ; Vol. 151, No. 9. pp. 883-891.
@article{b2a384194c144b339f7a50e40987e3fb,
title = "Assessments of girls' genital findings and the likelihood of sexual abuse: Agreement among physicians self-rated as skilled",
abstract = "Objectives: To measure agreement about genital examination findings among physicians who rate themselves as skilled in evaluating children for suspected sexual abuse, to compare these physicians' descriptions and interpretations with consensus standards developed by an expert panel, and to investigate the effects of physician and case characteristics on agreement. Study Design: Questionnaires including 7 simulated cases, each consisting of a brief history and 1 photograph of a girl's genitalia, were mailed to random samples of 2 groups: the members of 4 physician organizations concerned with child abuse or pediatric gynecology, and pediatricians at large. Among the surveyed physicians who rated their own skill in evaluating cases of suspected sexual abuse as higher than average, we measured agreement, both overall and between those with the, most and with less clinical experience, and assessed their conformity with consensus standard descriptions and interpretations. Results: We received responses from 548 (50.9{\%}) of 1076 physicians; 414 responses (75.5{\%}) were analyzable. Two hundred six physicians (50{\%}) rated themselves as skilled in assessing children for sexual abuse. On average, 45{\%} of these physicians' descriptions and 72.6{\%} of their interpretations conformed with the consensus standards. In 4 cases, between 5{\%} and 20.7{\%} of these physicians described genital findings that the expert panel had considered; absent from the photographs. Conformity with standard interpretations tended to be higher in cases with photographs concordant with the accompanying, unambiguous histories (P=.06). The most experienced physicians resembled the expert panel more closely than did the less experienced self-rated skilled physicians in interpreting 3 simulated cases (P≤.001). Conclusions: Assessments of girls' genital findings by physicians who rate themselves as skilled in examining children for suspected sexual abuse often differ. In some cases, among physicians who all rate themselves as skilled, assessments made by very experienced physicians may conform more closely to consensus standards than do assessments made by less experienced physicians.",
author = "Paradise, {Jan E.} and Finkel, {Martin A.} and Beiser, {Alexa S.} and Abbey Berenson and Greenberg, {Donna B.} and Winter, {Michael R.}",
year = "1997",
month = "9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "151",
pages = "883--891",
journal = "JAMA Pediatrics",
issn = "2168-6203",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessments of girls' genital findings and the likelihood of sexual abuse

T2 - Agreement among physicians self-rated as skilled

AU - Paradise, Jan E.

AU - Finkel, Martin A.

AU - Beiser, Alexa S.

AU - Berenson, Abbey

AU - Greenberg, Donna B.

AU - Winter, Michael R.

PY - 1997/9

Y1 - 1997/9

N2 - Objectives: To measure agreement about genital examination findings among physicians who rate themselves as skilled in evaluating children for suspected sexual abuse, to compare these physicians' descriptions and interpretations with consensus standards developed by an expert panel, and to investigate the effects of physician and case characteristics on agreement. Study Design: Questionnaires including 7 simulated cases, each consisting of a brief history and 1 photograph of a girl's genitalia, were mailed to random samples of 2 groups: the members of 4 physician organizations concerned with child abuse or pediatric gynecology, and pediatricians at large. Among the surveyed physicians who rated their own skill in evaluating cases of suspected sexual abuse as higher than average, we measured agreement, both overall and between those with the, most and with less clinical experience, and assessed their conformity with consensus standard descriptions and interpretations. Results: We received responses from 548 (50.9%) of 1076 physicians; 414 responses (75.5%) were analyzable. Two hundred six physicians (50%) rated themselves as skilled in assessing children for sexual abuse. On average, 45% of these physicians' descriptions and 72.6% of their interpretations conformed with the consensus standards. In 4 cases, between 5% and 20.7% of these physicians described genital findings that the expert panel had considered; absent from the photographs. Conformity with standard interpretations tended to be higher in cases with photographs concordant with the accompanying, unambiguous histories (P=.06). The most experienced physicians resembled the expert panel more closely than did the less experienced self-rated skilled physicians in interpreting 3 simulated cases (P≤.001). Conclusions: Assessments of girls' genital findings by physicians who rate themselves as skilled in examining children for suspected sexual abuse often differ. In some cases, among physicians who all rate themselves as skilled, assessments made by very experienced physicians may conform more closely to consensus standards than do assessments made by less experienced physicians.

AB - Objectives: To measure agreement about genital examination findings among physicians who rate themselves as skilled in evaluating children for suspected sexual abuse, to compare these physicians' descriptions and interpretations with consensus standards developed by an expert panel, and to investigate the effects of physician and case characteristics on agreement. Study Design: Questionnaires including 7 simulated cases, each consisting of a brief history and 1 photograph of a girl's genitalia, were mailed to random samples of 2 groups: the members of 4 physician organizations concerned with child abuse or pediatric gynecology, and pediatricians at large. Among the surveyed physicians who rated their own skill in evaluating cases of suspected sexual abuse as higher than average, we measured agreement, both overall and between those with the, most and with less clinical experience, and assessed their conformity with consensus standard descriptions and interpretations. Results: We received responses from 548 (50.9%) of 1076 physicians; 414 responses (75.5%) were analyzable. Two hundred six physicians (50%) rated themselves as skilled in assessing children for sexual abuse. On average, 45% of these physicians' descriptions and 72.6% of their interpretations conformed with the consensus standards. In 4 cases, between 5% and 20.7% of these physicians described genital findings that the expert panel had considered; absent from the photographs. Conformity with standard interpretations tended to be higher in cases with photographs concordant with the accompanying, unambiguous histories (P=.06). The most experienced physicians resembled the expert panel more closely than did the less experienced self-rated skilled physicians in interpreting 3 simulated cases (P≤.001). Conclusions: Assessments of girls' genital findings by physicians who rate themselves as skilled in examining children for suspected sexual abuse often differ. In some cases, among physicians who all rate themselves as skilled, assessments made by very experienced physicians may conform more closely to consensus standards than do assessments made by less experienced physicians.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030612589&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030612589&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9308865

AN - SCOPUS:0030612589

VL - 151

SP - 883

EP - 891

JO - JAMA Pediatrics

JF - JAMA Pediatrics

SN - 2168-6203

IS - 9

ER -