TY - JOUR
T1 - Association of SARS-CoV-2 With Health-related Quality of Life 1 Year After Illness Using Latent Transition Analysis
AU - for the INSPIRE Group
AU - Wisk, Lauren E.
AU - Gottlieb, Michael
AU - Chen, Peizheng
AU - Yu, Huihui
AU - O'laughlin, Kelli N.
AU - Stephens, Kari A.
AU - Nichol, Graham
AU - Montoy, Juan Carlos C.
AU - Rodriguez, Robert M.
AU - Santangelo, Michelle
AU - Gatling, Kristyn
AU - Spatz, Erica S.
AU - Venkatesh, Arjun K.
AU - Rising, Kristin L.
AU - Hill, Mandy J.
AU - Huebinger, Ryan
AU - Idris, Ahamed H.
AU - Willis, Michael
AU - Kean, Efrat
AU - Mcdonald, Samuel A.
AU - Elmore, Joann G.
AU - Weinstein, Robert A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.
PY - 2025/6/1
Y1 - 2025/6/1
N2 - Background Long-term sequelae after SARS-CoV-2 infection may impact health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL), yet it is unknown how HRQoL changes during recovery. We compared patient-reported HRQoL among adults with COVID-19-like illness who tested SARS-CoV-2 positive (COVID+) with those who tested negative (COVID-). Methods Participants in this prospective, multicenter, longitudinal registry study were enrolled from December 2020 through August 2022 and completed 3-month follow-up assessments until 12 months after enrollment. Participants were adults (≥18 years) with acute symptoms suggestive of COVID-19 who received a Food and Drug Administration-approved SARS-CoV-2 test. Participants received questions from PROMIS-29 (subscales: physical function, anxiety, depression, fatigue, social participation, sleep disturbance, and pain interference) and PROMIS SF-8a (cognitive function). Latent transition analysis was used to identify meaningful patterns in HRQoL scores over time; 4 HRQoL categories were compared descriptively and using multivariable regression. Inverse probability weighting was used to adjust for covariate imbalance. Results There were 1096 (75%) COVID+ and 371 (25%) COVID-. Four distinct well-being classes emerged: optimal overall, poor mental, poor physical, and poor overall HRQoL. COVID+ participants were more likely to return to the optimal HRQoL class compared to COVID- participants. The most substantial transition from poor physical to optimal HRQoL occurred by 3 months, whereas movement from poor mental to optimal HRQoL occurred by 9 months. Conclusions In adults with COVID-19-like illness, COVID+ participants demonstrated meaningful recovery in their physical HRQoL by 3 months after infection, but mental HRQoL took longer to improve. Suboptimal HRQoL at 3 to 12 months after infection remained in approximately 20%.
AB - Background Long-term sequelae after SARS-CoV-2 infection may impact health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL), yet it is unknown how HRQoL changes during recovery. We compared patient-reported HRQoL among adults with COVID-19-like illness who tested SARS-CoV-2 positive (COVID+) with those who tested negative (COVID-). Methods Participants in this prospective, multicenter, longitudinal registry study were enrolled from December 2020 through August 2022 and completed 3-month follow-up assessments until 12 months after enrollment. Participants were adults (≥18 years) with acute symptoms suggestive of COVID-19 who received a Food and Drug Administration-approved SARS-CoV-2 test. Participants received questions from PROMIS-29 (subscales: physical function, anxiety, depression, fatigue, social participation, sleep disturbance, and pain interference) and PROMIS SF-8a (cognitive function). Latent transition analysis was used to identify meaningful patterns in HRQoL scores over time; 4 HRQoL categories were compared descriptively and using multivariable regression. Inverse probability weighting was used to adjust for covariate imbalance. Results There were 1096 (75%) COVID+ and 371 (25%) COVID-. Four distinct well-being classes emerged: optimal overall, poor mental, poor physical, and poor overall HRQoL. COVID+ participants were more likely to return to the optimal HRQoL class compared to COVID- participants. The most substantial transition from poor physical to optimal HRQoL occurred by 3 months, whereas movement from poor mental to optimal HRQoL occurred by 9 months. Conclusions In adults with COVID-19-like illness, COVID+ participants demonstrated meaningful recovery in their physical HRQoL by 3 months after infection, but mental HRQoL took longer to improve. Suboptimal HRQoL at 3 to 12 months after infection remained in approximately 20%.
KW - COVID-19
KW - health-related quality of life
KW - prospective cohort study
KW - SARS-CoV-2
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105008335043
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105008335043#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1093/ofid/ofaf278
DO - 10.1093/ofid/ofaf278
M3 - Article
C2 - 40496983
AN - SCOPUS:105008335043
SN - 2328-8957
VL - 12
JO - Open Forum Infectious Diseases
JF - Open Forum Infectious Diseases
IS - 6
M1 - ofaf278
ER -