Attitudes of Residents and Program Directors Towards Research in Otolaryngology Residency

Ahmed Mansi, Wade N. Karam, Mohamad Chaaban

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To determine attitudes of residents and program directors towards research during residency training. Study Design: Survey of current otolaryngology residents and program directors. Setting: Otolaryngology residency programs. Methods: An anonymous web-based survey (www.surveymonkey.com) was sent to 106 program directors (PDs) and 115 program coordinators. The program coordinators subsequently sent it to residents. Fisher exact tests and correlations were used to determine statistically significant differences. Results: Overall, 178 residents and 31 PDs responded to our surveys. All residents surveyed reported some research experience prior to residency. Residents who reported a previous first-author manuscript publication prior to residency were more likely than residents who had no previous first-author publication to report a first-author publication during residency (58.44% vs 27.27%, P <.0001); 33% of the residents reported academics as a desired future career setting after residency. The most significant barrier to research perceived by the residents was time constraint due to residency duties and personal commitments (93% and 74%, respectively). The second and third most common barriers to research were lack of statistical knowledge at 52% and lack of interest in research at 43.6%. Conclusions: Research is a required component of otolaryngology residency training. The most significant barrier in our survey was the lack of protected research time, followed by lack of biostatistical knowledge and interest. Program directors may need to implement structured research rotations tailored to individual residents’ research interests and integrate training in research methodology and biostatistics.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)28-35
Number of pages8
JournalAnnals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology
Volume128
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Otolaryngology
Internship and Residency
Research
Publications
Biostatistics
Manuscripts
Research Design
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • medical education
  • resident research
  • statistics
  • survey

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Attitudes of Residents and Program Directors Towards Research in Otolaryngology Residency. / Mansi, Ahmed; Karam, Wade N.; Chaaban, Mohamad.

In: Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, Vol. 128, No. 1, 01.01.2019, p. 28-35.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mansi, Ahmed ; Karam, Wade N. ; Chaaban, Mohamad. / Attitudes of Residents and Program Directors Towards Research in Otolaryngology Residency. In: Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology. 2019 ; Vol. 128, No. 1. pp. 28-35.
@article{b28f20941f7947e7b3fe3de9401d3935,
title = "Attitudes of Residents and Program Directors Towards Research in Otolaryngology Residency",
abstract = "Objective: To determine attitudes of residents and program directors towards research during residency training. Study Design: Survey of current otolaryngology residents and program directors. Setting: Otolaryngology residency programs. Methods: An anonymous web-based survey (www.surveymonkey.com) was sent to 106 program directors (PDs) and 115 program coordinators. The program coordinators subsequently sent it to residents. Fisher exact tests and correlations were used to determine statistically significant differences. Results: Overall, 178 residents and 31 PDs responded to our surveys. All residents surveyed reported some research experience prior to residency. Residents who reported a previous first-author manuscript publication prior to residency were more likely than residents who had no previous first-author publication to report a first-author publication during residency (58.44{\%} vs 27.27{\%}, P <.0001); 33{\%} of the residents reported academics as a desired future career setting after residency. The most significant barrier to research perceived by the residents was time constraint due to residency duties and personal commitments (93{\%} and 74{\%}, respectively). The second and third most common barriers to research were lack of statistical knowledge at 52{\%} and lack of interest in research at 43.6{\%}. Conclusions: Research is a required component of otolaryngology residency training. The most significant barrier in our survey was the lack of protected research time, followed by lack of biostatistical knowledge and interest. Program directors may need to implement structured research rotations tailored to individual residents’ research interests and integrate training in research methodology and biostatistics.",
keywords = "medical education, resident research, statistics, survey",
author = "Ahmed Mansi and Karam, {Wade N.} and Mohamad Chaaban",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0003489418804565",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "128",
pages = "28--35",
journal = "Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology",
issn = "0003-4894",
publisher = "Annals Publishing Company",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Attitudes of Residents and Program Directors Towards Research in Otolaryngology Residency

AU - Mansi, Ahmed

AU - Karam, Wade N.

AU - Chaaban, Mohamad

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Objective: To determine attitudes of residents and program directors towards research during residency training. Study Design: Survey of current otolaryngology residents and program directors. Setting: Otolaryngology residency programs. Methods: An anonymous web-based survey (www.surveymonkey.com) was sent to 106 program directors (PDs) and 115 program coordinators. The program coordinators subsequently sent it to residents. Fisher exact tests and correlations were used to determine statistically significant differences. Results: Overall, 178 residents and 31 PDs responded to our surveys. All residents surveyed reported some research experience prior to residency. Residents who reported a previous first-author manuscript publication prior to residency were more likely than residents who had no previous first-author publication to report a first-author publication during residency (58.44% vs 27.27%, P <.0001); 33% of the residents reported academics as a desired future career setting after residency. The most significant barrier to research perceived by the residents was time constraint due to residency duties and personal commitments (93% and 74%, respectively). The second and third most common barriers to research were lack of statistical knowledge at 52% and lack of interest in research at 43.6%. Conclusions: Research is a required component of otolaryngology residency training. The most significant barrier in our survey was the lack of protected research time, followed by lack of biostatistical knowledge and interest. Program directors may need to implement structured research rotations tailored to individual residents’ research interests and integrate training in research methodology and biostatistics.

AB - Objective: To determine attitudes of residents and program directors towards research during residency training. Study Design: Survey of current otolaryngology residents and program directors. Setting: Otolaryngology residency programs. Methods: An anonymous web-based survey (www.surveymonkey.com) was sent to 106 program directors (PDs) and 115 program coordinators. The program coordinators subsequently sent it to residents. Fisher exact tests and correlations were used to determine statistically significant differences. Results: Overall, 178 residents and 31 PDs responded to our surveys. All residents surveyed reported some research experience prior to residency. Residents who reported a previous first-author manuscript publication prior to residency were more likely than residents who had no previous first-author publication to report a first-author publication during residency (58.44% vs 27.27%, P <.0001); 33% of the residents reported academics as a desired future career setting after residency. The most significant barrier to research perceived by the residents was time constraint due to residency duties and personal commitments (93% and 74%, respectively). The second and third most common barriers to research were lack of statistical knowledge at 52% and lack of interest in research at 43.6%. Conclusions: Research is a required component of otolaryngology residency training. The most significant barrier in our survey was the lack of protected research time, followed by lack of biostatistical knowledge and interest. Program directors may need to implement structured research rotations tailored to individual residents’ research interests and integrate training in research methodology and biostatistics.

KW - medical education

KW - resident research

KW - statistics

KW - survey

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058598702&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85058598702&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0003489418804565

DO - 10.1177/0003489418804565

M3 - Article

VL - 128

SP - 28

EP - 35

JO - Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology

JF - Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology

SN - 0003-4894

IS - 1

ER -