TY - JOUR
T1 - Automated detection and analysis of subdural hematomas using a machine learning algorithm
AU - Colasurdo, Marco
AU - Leibushor, Nir
AU - Robledo, Ariadna
AU - Vasandani, Viren
AU - Luna, Zean Aaron
AU - Rao, Abhijit S.
AU - Garcia, Roberto
AU - Srinivasan, Visish M.
AU - Sheth, Sunil A.
AU - Avni, Naama
AU - Madziva, Moleen
AU - Berejick, Mor
AU - Sirota, Goni
AU - Efrati, Aielet
AU - Meisel, Avraham
AU - Shaltoni, Hashem
AU - Kan, Peter
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© AANS 2023, except where prohibited by US copyright law.
PY - 2023/4
Y1 - 2023/4
N2 - OBJECTIVE Machine learning algorithms have shown groundbreaking results in neuroimaging. Herein, the authors evaluate the performance of a newly developed convolutional neural network (CNN) to detect and quantify the thickness, volume, and midline shift (MLS) of subdural hematoma (SDH) from noncontrast head CT (NCHCT). METHODS NCHCT studies performed for the evaluation of head trauma in consecutive patients between July 2018 and April 2021 at a single institution were retrospectively identified. Ground truth determination of SDH, thickness, and MLS was established by the neuroradiology report. The primary outcome was performance of the CNN in detecting SDH in an external validation set, as measured using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Secondary outcomes included accuracy for thickness, volume, and MLS. RESULTS Among 263 cases with valid NCHCT according to the study criteria, 135 patients (51%) were male, the mean (± standard deviation) age was 61 ± 23 years, and 70 patients were diagnosed with SDH on neuroradiologist evaluation. The median SDH thickness was 11 mm (IQR 6 mm), and 16 patients had a median MLS of 5 mm (IQR 2.25 mm). In the independent data set, the CNN performed well, with sensitivity of 91.4% (95% CI 82.3%–96.8%), specificity of 96.4% (95% CI 92.7%–98.5%), and accuracy of 95.1% (95% CI 91.7%–97.3%); sensitivity for the subgroup with an SDH thickness above 10 mm was 100%. The maximum thickness mean absolute error was 2.75 mm (95% CI 2.14–3.37 mm), whereas the MLS mean absolute error was 0.93 mm (95% CI 0.55–1.31 mm). The Pearson correlation coefficient computed to determine agreement between automated and manual segmentation measurements was 0.97 (95% CI 0.96–0.98). CONCLUSIONS The described Viz.ai SDH CNN performed exceptionally well at identifying and quantifying key features of SDHs in an independent validation imaging data set.
AB - OBJECTIVE Machine learning algorithms have shown groundbreaking results in neuroimaging. Herein, the authors evaluate the performance of a newly developed convolutional neural network (CNN) to detect and quantify the thickness, volume, and midline shift (MLS) of subdural hematoma (SDH) from noncontrast head CT (NCHCT). METHODS NCHCT studies performed for the evaluation of head trauma in consecutive patients between July 2018 and April 2021 at a single institution were retrospectively identified. Ground truth determination of SDH, thickness, and MLS was established by the neuroradiology report. The primary outcome was performance of the CNN in detecting SDH in an external validation set, as measured using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Secondary outcomes included accuracy for thickness, volume, and MLS. RESULTS Among 263 cases with valid NCHCT according to the study criteria, 135 patients (51%) were male, the mean (± standard deviation) age was 61 ± 23 years, and 70 patients were diagnosed with SDH on neuroradiologist evaluation. The median SDH thickness was 11 mm (IQR 6 mm), and 16 patients had a median MLS of 5 mm (IQR 2.25 mm). In the independent data set, the CNN performed well, with sensitivity of 91.4% (95% CI 82.3%–96.8%), specificity of 96.4% (95% CI 92.7%–98.5%), and accuracy of 95.1% (95% CI 91.7%–97.3%); sensitivity for the subgroup with an SDH thickness above 10 mm was 100%. The maximum thickness mean absolute error was 2.75 mm (95% CI 2.14–3.37 mm), whereas the MLS mean absolute error was 0.93 mm (95% CI 0.55–1.31 mm). The Pearson correlation coefficient computed to determine agreement between automated and manual segmentation measurements was 0.97 (95% CI 0.96–0.98). CONCLUSIONS The described Viz.ai SDH CNN performed exceptionally well at identifying and quantifying key features of SDHs in an independent validation imaging data set.
KW - AI
KW - CT
KW - artificial intelligence
KW - hemorrhage
KW - subdural
KW - technology
KW - trauma
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85151377091&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85151377091&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3171/2022.8.JNS22888
DO - 10.3171/2022.8.JNS22888
M3 - Article
C2 - 36461839
AN - SCOPUS:85151377091
SN - 0022-3085
VL - 138
SP - 1077
EP - 1084
JO - Journal of neurosurgery
JF - Journal of neurosurgery
IS - 4
ER -