Back pain, physical function, and estimates of aerobic capacity: What are the relationships among methods and measures?

Inácio T. Cunha, Maureen J. Simmonds, Elizabeth J. Protas, Stanley Jones

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To establish the correlations of measures of self-reported disability, self-efficacy, physical performance, level of pain, and estimates of aerobic capacity (Pvo2) in subjects with low back pain. Design: Fifty-one low back pain subjects, ranging in age from 26 to 65 yr, entered the study. Participants completed the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the self-efficacy questionnaire. Physical performance was evaluated by the loaded-reach test, sit/stand test, 5-min walk test, 50-foot walking test, and time to roll from right to left. Pain intensity and pain affect were measured using two visual analog scales. Pvo2 was predicted from an equation. Results: The correlation coefficient among the physical performance outcomes ranged from 0.47 to 0.78. Pain measures had low correlations with measures of function but stronger correlations with other self-report measures. The disability measure correlated moderately with physical performance. Correlations between Pvo2 and all other measurements were minimal, except for the 5-min walk test. Conclusion: Performance and disability were more consistent in evaluating low back pain. Pvo2 failed to correlate with most other aspects of low back pain. This study suggests that aerobic capacity might not be a primary concern for patients with low back pain.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)913-920
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume81
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Back Pain
Low Back Pain
Pain
Self Efficacy
Visual Analog Scale
Self Report
Walking
Surveys and Questionnaires
Walk Test

Keywords

  • Aerobic capacity
  • Disability
  • Function
  • Low back pain
  • Performance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Health Professions(all)
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Back pain, physical function, and estimates of aerobic capacity : What are the relationships among methods and measures? / Cunha, Inácio T.; Simmonds, Maureen J.; Protas, Elizabeth J.; Jones, Stanley.

In: American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 81, No. 12, 01.12.2002, p. 913-920.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cunha, Inácio T. ; Simmonds, Maureen J. ; Protas, Elizabeth J. ; Jones, Stanley. / Back pain, physical function, and estimates of aerobic capacity : What are the relationships among methods and measures?. In: American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2002 ; Vol. 81, No. 12. pp. 913-920.
@article{93f6e14bac5c4929888eae3aaa6d87f3,
title = "Back pain, physical function, and estimates of aerobic capacity: What are the relationships among methods and measures?",
abstract = "Objectives: To establish the correlations of measures of self-reported disability, self-efficacy, physical performance, level of pain, and estimates of aerobic capacity (Pvo2) in subjects with low back pain. Design: Fifty-one low back pain subjects, ranging in age from 26 to 65 yr, entered the study. Participants completed the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the self-efficacy questionnaire. Physical performance was evaluated by the loaded-reach test, sit/stand test, 5-min walk test, 50-foot walking test, and time to roll from right to left. Pain intensity and pain affect were measured using two visual analog scales. Pvo2 was predicted from an equation. Results: The correlation coefficient among the physical performance outcomes ranged from 0.47 to 0.78. Pain measures had low correlations with measures of function but stronger correlations with other self-report measures. The disability measure correlated moderately with physical performance. Correlations between Pvo2 and all other measurements were minimal, except for the 5-min walk test. Conclusion: Performance and disability were more consistent in evaluating low back pain. Pvo2 failed to correlate with most other aspects of low back pain. This study suggests that aerobic capacity might not be a primary concern for patients with low back pain.",
keywords = "Aerobic capacity, Disability, Function, Low back pain, Performance",
author = "Cunha, {In{\'a}cio T.} and Simmonds, {Maureen J.} and Protas, {Elizabeth J.} and Stanley Jones",
year = "2002",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/00002060-200212000-00005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "81",
pages = "913--920",
journal = "American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation",
issn = "0894-9115",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Back pain, physical function, and estimates of aerobic capacity

T2 - What are the relationships among methods and measures?

AU - Cunha, Inácio T.

AU - Simmonds, Maureen J.

AU - Protas, Elizabeth J.

AU - Jones, Stanley

PY - 2002/12/1

Y1 - 2002/12/1

N2 - Objectives: To establish the correlations of measures of self-reported disability, self-efficacy, physical performance, level of pain, and estimates of aerobic capacity (Pvo2) in subjects with low back pain. Design: Fifty-one low back pain subjects, ranging in age from 26 to 65 yr, entered the study. Participants completed the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the self-efficacy questionnaire. Physical performance was evaluated by the loaded-reach test, sit/stand test, 5-min walk test, 50-foot walking test, and time to roll from right to left. Pain intensity and pain affect were measured using two visual analog scales. Pvo2 was predicted from an equation. Results: The correlation coefficient among the physical performance outcomes ranged from 0.47 to 0.78. Pain measures had low correlations with measures of function but stronger correlations with other self-report measures. The disability measure correlated moderately with physical performance. Correlations between Pvo2 and all other measurements were minimal, except for the 5-min walk test. Conclusion: Performance and disability were more consistent in evaluating low back pain. Pvo2 failed to correlate with most other aspects of low back pain. This study suggests that aerobic capacity might not be a primary concern for patients with low back pain.

AB - Objectives: To establish the correlations of measures of self-reported disability, self-efficacy, physical performance, level of pain, and estimates of aerobic capacity (Pvo2) in subjects with low back pain. Design: Fifty-one low back pain subjects, ranging in age from 26 to 65 yr, entered the study. Participants completed the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the self-efficacy questionnaire. Physical performance was evaluated by the loaded-reach test, sit/stand test, 5-min walk test, 50-foot walking test, and time to roll from right to left. Pain intensity and pain affect were measured using two visual analog scales. Pvo2 was predicted from an equation. Results: The correlation coefficient among the physical performance outcomes ranged from 0.47 to 0.78. Pain measures had low correlations with measures of function but stronger correlations with other self-report measures. The disability measure correlated moderately with physical performance. Correlations between Pvo2 and all other measurements were minimal, except for the 5-min walk test. Conclusion: Performance and disability were more consistent in evaluating low back pain. Pvo2 failed to correlate with most other aspects of low back pain. This study suggests that aerobic capacity might not be a primary concern for patients with low back pain.

KW - Aerobic capacity

KW - Disability

KW - Function

KW - Low back pain

KW - Performance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036890160&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036890160&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00002060-200212000-00005

DO - 10.1097/00002060-200212000-00005

M3 - Article

C2 - 12447090

AN - SCOPUS:0036890160

VL - 81

SP - 913

EP - 920

JO - American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

JF - American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

SN - 0894-9115

IS - 12

ER -