Abstract
Objectives: To establish the correlations of measures of self-reported disability, self-efficacy, physical performance, level of pain, and estimates of aerobic capacity (Pvo2) in subjects with low back pain. Design: Fifty-one low back pain subjects, ranging in age from 26 to 65 yr, entered the study. Participants completed the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the self-efficacy questionnaire. Physical performance was evaluated by the loaded-reach test, sit/stand test, 5-min walk test, 50-foot walking test, and time to roll from right to left. Pain intensity and pain affect were measured using two visual analog scales. Pvo2 was predicted from an equation. Results: The correlation coefficient among the physical performance outcomes ranged from 0.47 to 0.78. Pain measures had low correlations with measures of function but stronger correlations with other self-report measures. The disability measure correlated moderately with physical performance. Correlations between Pvo2 and all other measurements were minimal, except for the 5-min walk test. Conclusion: Performance and disability were more consistent in evaluating low back pain. Pvo2 failed to correlate with most other aspects of low back pain. This study suggests that aerobic capacity might not be a primary concern for patients with low back pain.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 913-920 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation |
| Volume | 81 |
| Issue number | 12 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Dec 1 2002 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- Aerobic capacity
- Disability
- Function
- Low back pain
- Performance
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Rehabilitation
- Health Professions(all)
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
- Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
Cite this
Back pain, physical function, and estimates of aerobic capacity : What are the relationships among methods and measures? / Cunha, Inácio T.; Simmonds, Maureen J.; Protas, Elizabeth J.; Jones, Stanley.
In: American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 81, No. 12, 01.12.2002, p. 913-920.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Back pain, physical function, and estimates of aerobic capacity
T2 - What are the relationships among methods and measures?
AU - Cunha, Inácio T.
AU - Simmonds, Maureen J.
AU - Protas, Elizabeth J.
AU - Jones, Stanley
PY - 2002/12/1
Y1 - 2002/12/1
N2 - Objectives: To establish the correlations of measures of self-reported disability, self-efficacy, physical performance, level of pain, and estimates of aerobic capacity (Pvo2) in subjects with low back pain. Design: Fifty-one low back pain subjects, ranging in age from 26 to 65 yr, entered the study. Participants completed the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the self-efficacy questionnaire. Physical performance was evaluated by the loaded-reach test, sit/stand test, 5-min walk test, 50-foot walking test, and time to roll from right to left. Pain intensity and pain affect were measured using two visual analog scales. Pvo2 was predicted from an equation. Results: The correlation coefficient among the physical performance outcomes ranged from 0.47 to 0.78. Pain measures had low correlations with measures of function but stronger correlations with other self-report measures. The disability measure correlated moderately with physical performance. Correlations between Pvo2 and all other measurements were minimal, except for the 5-min walk test. Conclusion: Performance and disability were more consistent in evaluating low back pain. Pvo2 failed to correlate with most other aspects of low back pain. This study suggests that aerobic capacity might not be a primary concern for patients with low back pain.
AB - Objectives: To establish the correlations of measures of self-reported disability, self-efficacy, physical performance, level of pain, and estimates of aerobic capacity (Pvo2) in subjects with low back pain. Design: Fifty-one low back pain subjects, ranging in age from 26 to 65 yr, entered the study. Participants completed the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the self-efficacy questionnaire. Physical performance was evaluated by the loaded-reach test, sit/stand test, 5-min walk test, 50-foot walking test, and time to roll from right to left. Pain intensity and pain affect were measured using two visual analog scales. Pvo2 was predicted from an equation. Results: The correlation coefficient among the physical performance outcomes ranged from 0.47 to 0.78. Pain measures had low correlations with measures of function but stronger correlations with other self-report measures. The disability measure correlated moderately with physical performance. Correlations between Pvo2 and all other measurements were minimal, except for the 5-min walk test. Conclusion: Performance and disability were more consistent in evaluating low back pain. Pvo2 failed to correlate with most other aspects of low back pain. This study suggests that aerobic capacity might not be a primary concern for patients with low back pain.
KW - Aerobic capacity
KW - Disability
KW - Function
KW - Low back pain
KW - Performance
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036890160&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036890160&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/00002060-200212000-00005
DO - 10.1097/00002060-200212000-00005
M3 - Article
C2 - 12447090
AN - SCOPUS:0036890160
VL - 81
SP - 913
EP - 920
JO - American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
JF - American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
SN - 0894-9115
IS - 12
ER -