Beyond shared decision making: An expanded typology of medical decisions

Simon N. Whitney, Margaret Holmes-Rovner, Howard Brody, Carl Schneider, Laurence B. McCullough, Robert J. Volk, Amy L. McGuire

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

43 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The most popular current models of medical decision making, identified by names such as shared decision making, informed decision making, and evidence-based patient choice, portray an empowered patient actively involved in his or her medical choices and generally assume that patient and physician reach agreement. These models are limited to a specific type of decision (in which there is more than one choice) and a specific process (in which agreement is reached). The authors extend the model of medical decision making beyond shared decisions in 2 dimensions. First, the authors incorporate a class of medical decisions in which there is only one medically reasonable treatment option, such as the removal of a primary melanoma. Patient preferences are irrelevant to whether or not the melanoma should be removed, so there is no treatment choice in which the patient can share. When there is only one realistic treatment option, the clinician's job is not to offer alternatives but to explain why there is only one viable choice and move the decision-making process forward. The physician does not thereby abridge the patient's autonomy; rather, the disease process itself constrains both patient and physician. Second, the authors include decisions in which patient and physician do not reach agreement. Sometimes the patient insists on a particular treatment and the physician reluctantly yields, sometimes it is the other way around, but disagreement is commonplace in clinical medicine and its presence deserves inclusion in the way we think about medical decisions. Conflict resolution requires acknowledging the potential for conflict.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)699-705
Number of pages7
JournalMedical Decision Making
Volume28
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2008

Fingerprint

Decision Making
Physicians
Melanoma
Patient Preference
Clinical Medicine
Negotiating
Therapeutics
Names

Keywords

  • Decision making
  • Decision theory
  • Informed consent
  • Medical ethics
  • Patient participation
  • Physician-patient relations
  • Theoretical models
  • Treatment refusal

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

Whitney, S. N., Holmes-Rovner, M., Brody, H., Schneider, C., McCullough, L. B., Volk, R. J., & McGuire, A. L. (2008). Beyond shared decision making: An expanded typology of medical decisions. Medical Decision Making, 28(5), 699-705. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X08318465

Beyond shared decision making : An expanded typology of medical decisions. / Whitney, Simon N.; Holmes-Rovner, Margaret; Brody, Howard; Schneider, Carl; McCullough, Laurence B.; Volk, Robert J.; McGuire, Amy L.

In: Medical Decision Making, Vol. 28, No. 5, 09.2008, p. 699-705.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Whitney, SN, Holmes-Rovner, M, Brody, H, Schneider, C, McCullough, LB, Volk, RJ & McGuire, AL 2008, 'Beyond shared decision making: An expanded typology of medical decisions', Medical Decision Making, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 699-705. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X08318465
Whitney SN, Holmes-Rovner M, Brody H, Schneider C, McCullough LB, Volk RJ et al. Beyond shared decision making: An expanded typology of medical decisions. Medical Decision Making. 2008 Sep;28(5):699-705. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X08318465
Whitney, Simon N. ; Holmes-Rovner, Margaret ; Brody, Howard ; Schneider, Carl ; McCullough, Laurence B. ; Volk, Robert J. ; McGuire, Amy L. / Beyond shared decision making : An expanded typology of medical decisions. In: Medical Decision Making. 2008 ; Vol. 28, No. 5. pp. 699-705.
@article{77201f777e12459f91c244f33e0611a9,
title = "Beyond shared decision making: An expanded typology of medical decisions",
abstract = "The most popular current models of medical decision making, identified by names such as shared decision making, informed decision making, and evidence-based patient choice, portray an empowered patient actively involved in his or her medical choices and generally assume that patient and physician reach agreement. These models are limited to a specific type of decision (in which there is more than one choice) and a specific process (in which agreement is reached). The authors extend the model of medical decision making beyond shared decisions in 2 dimensions. First, the authors incorporate a class of medical decisions in which there is only one medically reasonable treatment option, such as the removal of a primary melanoma. Patient preferences are irrelevant to whether or not the melanoma should be removed, so there is no treatment choice in which the patient can share. When there is only one realistic treatment option, the clinician's job is not to offer alternatives but to explain why there is only one viable choice and move the decision-making process forward. The physician does not thereby abridge the patient's autonomy; rather, the disease process itself constrains both patient and physician. Second, the authors include decisions in which patient and physician do not reach agreement. Sometimes the patient insists on a particular treatment and the physician reluctantly yields, sometimes it is the other way around, but disagreement is commonplace in clinical medicine and its presence deserves inclusion in the way we think about medical decisions. Conflict resolution requires acknowledging the potential for conflict.",
keywords = "Decision making, Decision theory, Informed consent, Medical ethics, Patient participation, Physician-patient relations, Theoretical models, Treatment refusal",
author = "Whitney, {Simon N.} and Margaret Holmes-Rovner and Howard Brody and Carl Schneider and McCullough, {Laurence B.} and Volk, {Robert J.} and McGuire, {Amy L.}",
year = "2008",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1177/0272989X08318465",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "699--705",
journal = "Medical Decision Making",
issn = "0272-989X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Beyond shared decision making

T2 - An expanded typology of medical decisions

AU - Whitney, Simon N.

AU - Holmes-Rovner, Margaret

AU - Brody, Howard

AU - Schneider, Carl

AU - McCullough, Laurence B.

AU - Volk, Robert J.

AU - McGuire, Amy L.

PY - 2008/9

Y1 - 2008/9

N2 - The most popular current models of medical decision making, identified by names such as shared decision making, informed decision making, and evidence-based patient choice, portray an empowered patient actively involved in his or her medical choices and generally assume that patient and physician reach agreement. These models are limited to a specific type of decision (in which there is more than one choice) and a specific process (in which agreement is reached). The authors extend the model of medical decision making beyond shared decisions in 2 dimensions. First, the authors incorporate a class of medical decisions in which there is only one medically reasonable treatment option, such as the removal of a primary melanoma. Patient preferences are irrelevant to whether or not the melanoma should be removed, so there is no treatment choice in which the patient can share. When there is only one realistic treatment option, the clinician's job is not to offer alternatives but to explain why there is only one viable choice and move the decision-making process forward. The physician does not thereby abridge the patient's autonomy; rather, the disease process itself constrains both patient and physician. Second, the authors include decisions in which patient and physician do not reach agreement. Sometimes the patient insists on a particular treatment and the physician reluctantly yields, sometimes it is the other way around, but disagreement is commonplace in clinical medicine and its presence deserves inclusion in the way we think about medical decisions. Conflict resolution requires acknowledging the potential for conflict.

AB - The most popular current models of medical decision making, identified by names such as shared decision making, informed decision making, and evidence-based patient choice, portray an empowered patient actively involved in his or her medical choices and generally assume that patient and physician reach agreement. These models are limited to a specific type of decision (in which there is more than one choice) and a specific process (in which agreement is reached). The authors extend the model of medical decision making beyond shared decisions in 2 dimensions. First, the authors incorporate a class of medical decisions in which there is only one medically reasonable treatment option, such as the removal of a primary melanoma. Patient preferences are irrelevant to whether or not the melanoma should be removed, so there is no treatment choice in which the patient can share. When there is only one realistic treatment option, the clinician's job is not to offer alternatives but to explain why there is only one viable choice and move the decision-making process forward. The physician does not thereby abridge the patient's autonomy; rather, the disease process itself constrains both patient and physician. Second, the authors include decisions in which patient and physician do not reach agreement. Sometimes the patient insists on a particular treatment and the physician reluctantly yields, sometimes it is the other way around, but disagreement is commonplace in clinical medicine and its presence deserves inclusion in the way we think about medical decisions. Conflict resolution requires acknowledging the potential for conflict.

KW - Decision making

KW - Decision theory

KW - Informed consent

KW - Medical ethics

KW - Patient participation

KW - Physician-patient relations

KW - Theoretical models

KW - Treatment refusal

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=52149085248&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=52149085248&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0272989X08318465

DO - 10.1177/0272989X08318465

M3 - Article

C2 - 18556639

AN - SCOPUS:52149085248

VL - 28

SP - 699

EP - 705

JO - Medical Decision Making

JF - Medical Decision Making

SN - 0272-989X

IS - 5

ER -