Biomechanical comparison of flexible intramedullary nailing versus crossed Kirschner wire fixation in a canine model of pediatric forearm fractures

Jacob Battle, Kelly Carmichael, Randal P. Morris

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study compares the biomechanical properties of crossed Kirschner wires with those of flexible intramedullary nails in a canine model. The Kirschner wire groups had greater anteroposterior, lateral, and torsional stiffness and force to failure rates in most of the bones tested. Bones fixated with flexible intramedullary nails could bend and recoil during failure testing. The bones fixated with Kirschner wires failed at smaller levels of displacement and frequently had hardware cut-out during failure testing. Flexible intramedullary nails have more recoil and do not induce new fracture lines, which may explain their clinical superiority to Kirschner wires despite providing less rigid fixation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)370-375
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Pediatric Orthopaedics Part B
Volume15
Issue number5
StatePublished - Sep 2006

Fingerprint

Bone Wires
Intramedullary Fracture Fixation
Forearm
Canidae
Nails
Pediatrics
Bone and Bones
Mechanical Torsion

Keywords

  • Animal model
  • Forearm fractures
  • Intramedullary nailing
  • Kirschner wire
  • Pediatric

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

@article{433a77f8fa0448369efc9b03018b2b96,
title = "Biomechanical comparison of flexible intramedullary nailing versus crossed Kirschner wire fixation in a canine model of pediatric forearm fractures",
abstract = "This study compares the biomechanical properties of crossed Kirschner wires with those of flexible intramedullary nails in a canine model. The Kirschner wire groups had greater anteroposterior, lateral, and torsional stiffness and force to failure rates in most of the bones tested. Bones fixated with flexible intramedullary nails could bend and recoil during failure testing. The bones fixated with Kirschner wires failed at smaller levels of displacement and frequently had hardware cut-out during failure testing. Flexible intramedullary nails have more recoil and do not induce new fracture lines, which may explain their clinical superiority to Kirschner wires despite providing less rigid fixation.",
keywords = "Animal model, Forearm fractures, Intramedullary nailing, Kirschner wire, Pediatric",
author = "Jacob Battle and Kelly Carmichael and Morris, {Randal P.}",
year = "2006",
month = "9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "370--375",
journal = "Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics Part B",
issn = "1060-152X",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biomechanical comparison of flexible intramedullary nailing versus crossed Kirschner wire fixation in a canine model of pediatric forearm fractures

AU - Battle, Jacob

AU - Carmichael, Kelly

AU - Morris, Randal P.

PY - 2006/9

Y1 - 2006/9

N2 - This study compares the biomechanical properties of crossed Kirschner wires with those of flexible intramedullary nails in a canine model. The Kirschner wire groups had greater anteroposterior, lateral, and torsional stiffness and force to failure rates in most of the bones tested. Bones fixated with flexible intramedullary nails could bend and recoil during failure testing. The bones fixated with Kirschner wires failed at smaller levels of displacement and frequently had hardware cut-out during failure testing. Flexible intramedullary nails have more recoil and do not induce new fracture lines, which may explain their clinical superiority to Kirschner wires despite providing less rigid fixation.

AB - This study compares the biomechanical properties of crossed Kirschner wires with those of flexible intramedullary nails in a canine model. The Kirschner wire groups had greater anteroposterior, lateral, and torsional stiffness and force to failure rates in most of the bones tested. Bones fixated with flexible intramedullary nails could bend and recoil during failure testing. The bones fixated with Kirschner wires failed at smaller levels of displacement and frequently had hardware cut-out during failure testing. Flexible intramedullary nails have more recoil and do not induce new fracture lines, which may explain their clinical superiority to Kirschner wires despite providing less rigid fixation.

KW - Animal model

KW - Forearm fractures

KW - Intramedullary nailing

KW - Kirschner wire

KW - Pediatric

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33746919910&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33746919910&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 370

EP - 375

JO - Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics Part B

JF - Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics Part B

SN - 1060-152X

IS - 5

ER -