Biomechanical study of flexible intramedullary nails

Clint W. Johnson, Kelly Carmichael, Randal P. Morris, Brian Gilmer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Flexible intramedullary (IM) nailing is considered a safe, minimally invasive fixation technique with relatively low complication rates for long-bone fractures in the pediatric population. At our institution, questions have arisen about stability of fixation based on the distance of the nail past the fracture site. Clinically, this question arises with proximal or distal fractures and when the nail is unable to be passed to the desired distance past the fracture site. The purpose of our study was to compare biomechanical resistance with bending forces for fixation constructs whose IM nails are at differing distances beyond the fracture site in different bones. METHODS: This study tested matched pairs of canine radii, ulnas, and tibias in 4-point bending and compared the biomechanical properties of length of nail fixation past the fracture site in relation to bone diameter. RESULTS: Fixations of 1 or 2 diameters past the osteotomy yielded gross instability. There was no difference found in bending failure force, displacement, stiffness, or energy when comparing 3 versus 5 diameters of fixation past the fracture site. CONCLUSIONS: Flexible IM nails act as internal splints to align the fracture ends. At 3 diameters or more beyond the fracture site, the length does not significantly affect the biomechanical properties of the construct. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Flexible IM nails act as internal splints to align the fracture ends. At 3 diameters or more past the fracture site, the length of the nail does not greatly affect the biomechanical properties of the construct. This knowledge may be helpful in clinical scenarios where there is uncertainty about the expected strength of a shorter fixation. Examples include when the nail cannot be passed completely to the distal metaphysis and in proximal or distal long-bone fractures. Further clinical studies are needed to determine implications in a patient setting.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)44-48
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Pediatric Orthopaedics
Volume29
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2009

Fingerprint

Nails
Fracture Fixation
Splints
Bone Fractures
Intramedullary Fracture Fixation
Bone and Bones
Ulna
Osteotomy
Tibia
Uncertainty
Canidae
Pediatrics
Population

Keywords

  • Animal model
  • Bone nails
  • Fracture fixation
  • In vitro
  • Intramedullary
  • Pediatrics
  • Radius fractures
  • Tibial fractures
  • Ulna fractures

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Biomechanical study of flexible intramedullary nails. / Johnson, Clint W.; Carmichael, Kelly; Morris, Randal P.; Gilmer, Brian.

In: Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, Vol. 29, No. 1, 01.2009, p. 44-48.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Johnson, Clint W. ; Carmichael, Kelly ; Morris, Randal P. ; Gilmer, Brian. / Biomechanical study of flexible intramedullary nails. In: Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics. 2009 ; Vol. 29, No. 1. pp. 44-48.
@article{4c777a2a76014f4fb3e184048b3d7f8e,
title = "Biomechanical study of flexible intramedullary nails",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Flexible intramedullary (IM) nailing is considered a safe, minimally invasive fixation technique with relatively low complication rates for long-bone fractures in the pediatric population. At our institution, questions have arisen about stability of fixation based on the distance of the nail past the fracture site. Clinically, this question arises with proximal or distal fractures and when the nail is unable to be passed to the desired distance past the fracture site. The purpose of our study was to compare biomechanical resistance with bending forces for fixation constructs whose IM nails are at differing distances beyond the fracture site in different bones. METHODS: This study tested matched pairs of canine radii, ulnas, and tibias in 4-point bending and compared the biomechanical properties of length of nail fixation past the fracture site in relation to bone diameter. RESULTS: Fixations of 1 or 2 diameters past the osteotomy yielded gross instability. There was no difference found in bending failure force, displacement, stiffness, or energy when comparing 3 versus 5 diameters of fixation past the fracture site. CONCLUSIONS: Flexible IM nails act as internal splints to align the fracture ends. At 3 diameters or more beyond the fracture site, the length does not significantly affect the biomechanical properties of the construct. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Flexible IM nails act as internal splints to align the fracture ends. At 3 diameters or more past the fracture site, the length of the nail does not greatly affect the biomechanical properties of the construct. This knowledge may be helpful in clinical scenarios where there is uncertainty about the expected strength of a shorter fixation. Examples include when the nail cannot be passed completely to the distal metaphysis and in proximal or distal long-bone fractures. Further clinical studies are needed to determine implications in a patient setting.",
keywords = "Animal model, Bone nails, Fracture fixation, In vitro, Intramedullary, Pediatrics, Radius fractures, Tibial fractures, Ulna fractures",
author = "Johnson, {Clint W.} and Kelly Carmichael and Morris, {Randal P.} and Brian Gilmer",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181911ee3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "44--48",
journal = "Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics",
issn = "0271-6798",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biomechanical study of flexible intramedullary nails

AU - Johnson, Clint W.

AU - Carmichael, Kelly

AU - Morris, Randal P.

AU - Gilmer, Brian

PY - 2009/1

Y1 - 2009/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: Flexible intramedullary (IM) nailing is considered a safe, minimally invasive fixation technique with relatively low complication rates for long-bone fractures in the pediatric population. At our institution, questions have arisen about stability of fixation based on the distance of the nail past the fracture site. Clinically, this question arises with proximal or distal fractures and when the nail is unable to be passed to the desired distance past the fracture site. The purpose of our study was to compare biomechanical resistance with bending forces for fixation constructs whose IM nails are at differing distances beyond the fracture site in different bones. METHODS: This study tested matched pairs of canine radii, ulnas, and tibias in 4-point bending and compared the biomechanical properties of length of nail fixation past the fracture site in relation to bone diameter. RESULTS: Fixations of 1 or 2 diameters past the osteotomy yielded gross instability. There was no difference found in bending failure force, displacement, stiffness, or energy when comparing 3 versus 5 diameters of fixation past the fracture site. CONCLUSIONS: Flexible IM nails act as internal splints to align the fracture ends. At 3 diameters or more beyond the fracture site, the length does not significantly affect the biomechanical properties of the construct. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Flexible IM nails act as internal splints to align the fracture ends. At 3 diameters or more past the fracture site, the length of the nail does not greatly affect the biomechanical properties of the construct. This knowledge may be helpful in clinical scenarios where there is uncertainty about the expected strength of a shorter fixation. Examples include when the nail cannot be passed completely to the distal metaphysis and in proximal or distal long-bone fractures. Further clinical studies are needed to determine implications in a patient setting.

AB - BACKGROUND: Flexible intramedullary (IM) nailing is considered a safe, minimally invasive fixation technique with relatively low complication rates for long-bone fractures in the pediatric population. At our institution, questions have arisen about stability of fixation based on the distance of the nail past the fracture site. Clinically, this question arises with proximal or distal fractures and when the nail is unable to be passed to the desired distance past the fracture site. The purpose of our study was to compare biomechanical resistance with bending forces for fixation constructs whose IM nails are at differing distances beyond the fracture site in different bones. METHODS: This study tested matched pairs of canine radii, ulnas, and tibias in 4-point bending and compared the biomechanical properties of length of nail fixation past the fracture site in relation to bone diameter. RESULTS: Fixations of 1 or 2 diameters past the osteotomy yielded gross instability. There was no difference found in bending failure force, displacement, stiffness, or energy when comparing 3 versus 5 diameters of fixation past the fracture site. CONCLUSIONS: Flexible IM nails act as internal splints to align the fracture ends. At 3 diameters or more beyond the fracture site, the length does not significantly affect the biomechanical properties of the construct. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Flexible IM nails act as internal splints to align the fracture ends. At 3 diameters or more past the fracture site, the length of the nail does not greatly affect the biomechanical properties of the construct. This knowledge may be helpful in clinical scenarios where there is uncertainty about the expected strength of a shorter fixation. Examples include when the nail cannot be passed completely to the distal metaphysis and in proximal or distal long-bone fractures. Further clinical studies are needed to determine implications in a patient setting.

KW - Animal model

KW - Bone nails

KW - Fracture fixation

KW - In vitro

KW - Intramedullary

KW - Pediatrics

KW - Radius fractures

KW - Tibial fractures

KW - Ulna fractures

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=60549117956&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=60549117956&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181911ee3

DO - 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181911ee3

M3 - Article

C2 - 19098645

AN - SCOPUS:60549117956

VL - 29

SP - 44

EP - 48

JO - Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics

JF - Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics

SN - 0271-6798

IS - 1

ER -