Biomedical publication - Global profile and trend

Mahbubur Rahman, Tsuguya Fukui

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

125 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to describe the global profile of biomedical research productivity and to examine any improvement seen in it in the developing world during the period 1990-2000. Biomedical research articles published during 1990-2000 were accessed through the Medline database. The number of (journal) articles originating from each of the countries of the world, normalized to number of publications per million population (PPMP) per year, was elicited. In addition, the time trends of the number of publications in terms of each of the countries, continents, and economic groups were investigated. In terms of continents, North America had the highest number of biomedical PPMP per year (341.33); this was followed by Australia and Oceania (288.35), Europe (136.88), Asia (12.81), South America and Caribbean region (10.80), and Africa (3.50). In total, 52.7% of the countries showed a positive trend over time: 23.3% in South America, 28.9% in Africa, 40.0% in Australia and Oceania, 61.0% in Asia, 84.6% in Europe, and 100% in North America. All the continents except Africa showed a significantly positive trend. The share of the total number of publications went down for Africa (from 1.2 to 0.8%)and up slightly for Asia (from 14.3to 15.6%) and South America (from 1.3 to 1.8%) during 2000 compared with 1990. The better the economic ranking of a country, the higher the number of biomedical PPMP. The total share of publications coming from low-income countries also fell, from 2% in 1990 to 1.7% in 2000. The imbalance between developed and developing countries in terms of biomedical research is significant. Pragmatic policies should be adopted by the World Bank, World Health Organization, other United Nations bodies, and respective governments to encourage biomedical research in the less-developed parts of the world.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)274-280
Number of pages7
JournalPublic Health
Volume117
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Publications
Biomedical Research
South America
trend
Oceania
United Nations
North America
Economics
Population
Caribbean Region
WHO
Developed Countries
World Bank
Developing Countries
economics
ranking
UNO
pragmatics
low income
productivity

Keywords

  • Biomedical publication
  • Biomedical research
  • Medicine database
  • Research Productivity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)

Cite this

Biomedical publication - Global profile and trend. / Rahman, Mahbubur; Fukui, Tsuguya.

In: Public Health, Vol. 117, No. 4, 07.2003, p. 274-280.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rahman, Mahbubur ; Fukui, Tsuguya. / Biomedical publication - Global profile and trend. In: Public Health. 2003 ; Vol. 117, No. 4. pp. 274-280.
@article{705d30531aaf48e6aed1ad88a769bb67,
title = "Biomedical publication - Global profile and trend",
abstract = "The objectives of this study were to describe the global profile of biomedical research productivity and to examine any improvement seen in it in the developing world during the period 1990-2000. Biomedical research articles published during 1990-2000 were accessed through the Medline database. The number of (journal) articles originating from each of the countries of the world, normalized to number of publications per million population (PPMP) per year, was elicited. In addition, the time trends of the number of publications in terms of each of the countries, continents, and economic groups were investigated. In terms of continents, North America had the highest number of biomedical PPMP per year (341.33); this was followed by Australia and Oceania (288.35), Europe (136.88), Asia (12.81), South America and Caribbean region (10.80), and Africa (3.50). In total, 52.7{\%} of the countries showed a positive trend over time: 23.3{\%} in South America, 28.9{\%} in Africa, 40.0{\%} in Australia and Oceania, 61.0{\%} in Asia, 84.6{\%} in Europe, and 100{\%} in North America. All the continents except Africa showed a significantly positive trend. The share of the total number of publications went down for Africa (from 1.2 to 0.8{\%})and up slightly for Asia (from 14.3to 15.6{\%}) and South America (from 1.3 to 1.8{\%}) during 2000 compared with 1990. The better the economic ranking of a country, the higher the number of biomedical PPMP. The total share of publications coming from low-income countries also fell, from 2{\%} in 1990 to 1.7{\%} in 2000. The imbalance between developed and developing countries in terms of biomedical research is significant. Pragmatic policies should be adopted by the World Bank, World Health Organization, other United Nations bodies, and respective governments to encourage biomedical research in the less-developed parts of the world.",
keywords = "Biomedical publication, Biomedical research, Medicine database, Research Productivity",
author = "Mahbubur Rahman and Tsuguya Fukui",
year = "2003",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/S0033-3506(03)00068-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "117",
pages = "274--280",
journal = "Public Health",
issn = "0033-3506",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biomedical publication - Global profile and trend

AU - Rahman, Mahbubur

AU - Fukui, Tsuguya

PY - 2003/7

Y1 - 2003/7

N2 - The objectives of this study were to describe the global profile of biomedical research productivity and to examine any improvement seen in it in the developing world during the period 1990-2000. Biomedical research articles published during 1990-2000 were accessed through the Medline database. The number of (journal) articles originating from each of the countries of the world, normalized to number of publications per million population (PPMP) per year, was elicited. In addition, the time trends of the number of publications in terms of each of the countries, continents, and economic groups were investigated. In terms of continents, North America had the highest number of biomedical PPMP per year (341.33); this was followed by Australia and Oceania (288.35), Europe (136.88), Asia (12.81), South America and Caribbean region (10.80), and Africa (3.50). In total, 52.7% of the countries showed a positive trend over time: 23.3% in South America, 28.9% in Africa, 40.0% in Australia and Oceania, 61.0% in Asia, 84.6% in Europe, and 100% in North America. All the continents except Africa showed a significantly positive trend. The share of the total number of publications went down for Africa (from 1.2 to 0.8%)and up slightly for Asia (from 14.3to 15.6%) and South America (from 1.3 to 1.8%) during 2000 compared with 1990. The better the economic ranking of a country, the higher the number of biomedical PPMP. The total share of publications coming from low-income countries also fell, from 2% in 1990 to 1.7% in 2000. The imbalance between developed and developing countries in terms of biomedical research is significant. Pragmatic policies should be adopted by the World Bank, World Health Organization, other United Nations bodies, and respective governments to encourage biomedical research in the less-developed parts of the world.

AB - The objectives of this study were to describe the global profile of biomedical research productivity and to examine any improvement seen in it in the developing world during the period 1990-2000. Biomedical research articles published during 1990-2000 were accessed through the Medline database. The number of (journal) articles originating from each of the countries of the world, normalized to number of publications per million population (PPMP) per year, was elicited. In addition, the time trends of the number of publications in terms of each of the countries, continents, and economic groups were investigated. In terms of continents, North America had the highest number of biomedical PPMP per year (341.33); this was followed by Australia and Oceania (288.35), Europe (136.88), Asia (12.81), South America and Caribbean region (10.80), and Africa (3.50). In total, 52.7% of the countries showed a positive trend over time: 23.3% in South America, 28.9% in Africa, 40.0% in Australia and Oceania, 61.0% in Asia, 84.6% in Europe, and 100% in North America. All the continents except Africa showed a significantly positive trend. The share of the total number of publications went down for Africa (from 1.2 to 0.8%)and up slightly for Asia (from 14.3to 15.6%) and South America (from 1.3 to 1.8%) during 2000 compared with 1990. The better the economic ranking of a country, the higher the number of biomedical PPMP. The total share of publications coming from low-income countries also fell, from 2% in 1990 to 1.7% in 2000. The imbalance between developed and developing countries in terms of biomedical research is significant. Pragmatic policies should be adopted by the World Bank, World Health Organization, other United Nations bodies, and respective governments to encourage biomedical research in the less-developed parts of the world.

KW - Biomedical publication

KW - Biomedical research

KW - Medicine database

KW - Research Productivity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0038759835&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0038759835&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0033-3506(03)00068-4

DO - 10.1016/S0033-3506(03)00068-4

M3 - Article

VL - 117

SP - 274

EP - 280

JO - Public Health

JF - Public Health

SN - 0033-3506

IS - 4

ER -