Blunt versus sharp uterine incision expansion during low transverse cesarean delivery

A metaanalysis

Antonio F. Saad, Mahbubur Rahman, Maged M. Costantine, George R. Saade

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to review and update available evidence regarding outcomes after cesarean delivery (CD) using blunt vs sharp expansion of the uterine incision. STUDY DESIGN: We queried the database of PubMed (US National Library of Medicine, 1946 through December 2013), the Cochrane Library Database of Systematic Reviews, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Web of Science. All relevant bibliographies were reviewed. Randomized controlled trials comparing blunt with sharp expansion of the lower segment during CD were evaluated for inclusion and methodological quality. The primary outcome was occurrence of unintended extensions. Secondary outcomes were drop in hematocrit or hemoglobin and estimated maternal blood loss, need for transfusion, operative time, use of uterotonics, rate of endometritis, and neonatal outcomes. Data extraction, analysis, and results were based on the preferred reporting items for systematic review and metaanalysis guidelines. RESULTS: Six randomized controlled trials (2908 patients) were included. Blunt expansion technique was associated with lower drop in postoperative hematocrit (weighted mean difference [WMD], -1.07%; P =.05) and hemoglobin (WMD, -0.64 g/dL; P <.05), lower rate of unintended extensions (pooled relative risk, 0.47; P <.05), and a shorter operative time (WMD, -2 minutes; P <.05). Lower estimated blood loss was also observed but the difference was not significant (WMD, -88.07 mL; P >.05). There were no differences in the rates of blood transfusion, endometritis, use of uterotonics, and neonatal outcomes between both techniques. CONCLUSION: Blunt expansion of uterine incision during CD is associated with less unintended extensions and favorable maternal outcomes. Although the drop in hemoglobin, hematocrit, and operative times were in favor of blunt expansion, the degree of reduction may not be clinically relevant.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)684.e1-684.e11
JournalAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume211
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Hematocrit
Endometritis
Hemoglobins
Operative Time
Randomized Controlled Trials
Mothers
Databases
National Library of Medicine (U.S.)
Bibliography
PubMed
Blood Transfusion
Libraries
Guidelines

Keywords

  • blunt
  • cesarean delivery
  • expansion techniques
  • sharp
  • uterine incision

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Blunt versus sharp uterine incision expansion during low transverse cesarean delivery : A metaanalysis. / Saad, Antonio F.; Rahman, Mahbubur; Costantine, Maged M.; Saade, George R.

In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 211, No. 6, 01.12.2014, p. 684.e1-684.e11.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5b5be5fd8edd41fbb3f74c784bb1537a,
title = "Blunt versus sharp uterine incision expansion during low transverse cesarean delivery: A metaanalysis",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: We sought to review and update available evidence regarding outcomes after cesarean delivery (CD) using blunt vs sharp expansion of the uterine incision. STUDY DESIGN: We queried the database of PubMed (US National Library of Medicine, 1946 through December 2013), the Cochrane Library Database of Systematic Reviews, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Web of Science. All relevant bibliographies were reviewed. Randomized controlled trials comparing blunt with sharp expansion of the lower segment during CD were evaluated for inclusion and methodological quality. The primary outcome was occurrence of unintended extensions. Secondary outcomes were drop in hematocrit or hemoglobin and estimated maternal blood loss, need for transfusion, operative time, use of uterotonics, rate of endometritis, and neonatal outcomes. Data extraction, analysis, and results were based on the preferred reporting items for systematic review and metaanalysis guidelines. RESULTS: Six randomized controlled trials (2908 patients) were included. Blunt expansion technique was associated with lower drop in postoperative hematocrit (weighted mean difference [WMD], -1.07{\%}; P =.05) and hemoglobin (WMD, -0.64 g/dL; P <.05), lower rate of unintended extensions (pooled relative risk, 0.47; P <.05), and a shorter operative time (WMD, -2 minutes; P <.05). Lower estimated blood loss was also observed but the difference was not significant (WMD, -88.07 mL; P >.05). There were no differences in the rates of blood transfusion, endometritis, use of uterotonics, and neonatal outcomes between both techniques. CONCLUSION: Blunt expansion of uterine incision during CD is associated with less unintended extensions and favorable maternal outcomes. Although the drop in hemoglobin, hematocrit, and operative times were in favor of blunt expansion, the degree of reduction may not be clinically relevant.",
keywords = "blunt, cesarean delivery, expansion techniques, sharp, uterine incision",
author = "Saad, {Antonio F.} and Mahbubur Rahman and Costantine, {Maged M.} and Saade, {George R.}",
year = "2014",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajog.2014.06.050",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "211",
pages = "684.e1--684.e11",
journal = "American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0002-9378",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Blunt versus sharp uterine incision expansion during low transverse cesarean delivery

T2 - A metaanalysis

AU - Saad, Antonio F.

AU - Rahman, Mahbubur

AU - Costantine, Maged M.

AU - Saade, George R.

PY - 2014/12/1

Y1 - 2014/12/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE: We sought to review and update available evidence regarding outcomes after cesarean delivery (CD) using blunt vs sharp expansion of the uterine incision. STUDY DESIGN: We queried the database of PubMed (US National Library of Medicine, 1946 through December 2013), the Cochrane Library Database of Systematic Reviews, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Web of Science. All relevant bibliographies were reviewed. Randomized controlled trials comparing blunt with sharp expansion of the lower segment during CD were evaluated for inclusion and methodological quality. The primary outcome was occurrence of unintended extensions. Secondary outcomes were drop in hematocrit or hemoglobin and estimated maternal blood loss, need for transfusion, operative time, use of uterotonics, rate of endometritis, and neonatal outcomes. Data extraction, analysis, and results were based on the preferred reporting items for systematic review and metaanalysis guidelines. RESULTS: Six randomized controlled trials (2908 patients) were included. Blunt expansion technique was associated with lower drop in postoperative hematocrit (weighted mean difference [WMD], -1.07%; P =.05) and hemoglobin (WMD, -0.64 g/dL; P <.05), lower rate of unintended extensions (pooled relative risk, 0.47; P <.05), and a shorter operative time (WMD, -2 minutes; P <.05). Lower estimated blood loss was also observed but the difference was not significant (WMD, -88.07 mL; P >.05). There were no differences in the rates of blood transfusion, endometritis, use of uterotonics, and neonatal outcomes between both techniques. CONCLUSION: Blunt expansion of uterine incision during CD is associated with less unintended extensions and favorable maternal outcomes. Although the drop in hemoglobin, hematocrit, and operative times were in favor of blunt expansion, the degree of reduction may not be clinically relevant.

AB - OBJECTIVE: We sought to review and update available evidence regarding outcomes after cesarean delivery (CD) using blunt vs sharp expansion of the uterine incision. STUDY DESIGN: We queried the database of PubMed (US National Library of Medicine, 1946 through December 2013), the Cochrane Library Database of Systematic Reviews, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Web of Science. All relevant bibliographies were reviewed. Randomized controlled trials comparing blunt with sharp expansion of the lower segment during CD were evaluated for inclusion and methodological quality. The primary outcome was occurrence of unintended extensions. Secondary outcomes were drop in hematocrit or hemoglobin and estimated maternal blood loss, need for transfusion, operative time, use of uterotonics, rate of endometritis, and neonatal outcomes. Data extraction, analysis, and results were based on the preferred reporting items for systematic review and metaanalysis guidelines. RESULTS: Six randomized controlled trials (2908 patients) were included. Blunt expansion technique was associated with lower drop in postoperative hematocrit (weighted mean difference [WMD], -1.07%; P =.05) and hemoglobin (WMD, -0.64 g/dL; P <.05), lower rate of unintended extensions (pooled relative risk, 0.47; P <.05), and a shorter operative time (WMD, -2 minutes; P <.05). Lower estimated blood loss was also observed but the difference was not significant (WMD, -88.07 mL; P >.05). There were no differences in the rates of blood transfusion, endometritis, use of uterotonics, and neonatal outcomes between both techniques. CONCLUSION: Blunt expansion of uterine incision during CD is associated with less unintended extensions and favorable maternal outcomes. Although the drop in hemoglobin, hematocrit, and operative times were in favor of blunt expansion, the degree of reduction may not be clinically relevant.

KW - blunt

KW - cesarean delivery

KW - expansion techniques

KW - sharp

KW - uterine incision

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84922932146&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84922932146&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.06.050

DO - 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.06.050

M3 - Article

VL - 211

SP - 684.e1-684.e11

JO - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0002-9378

IS - 6

ER -