Abstract
This commentary responds to Moti Gorin's article “What Is the Aim of Pediatric ‘Gender-Affirming’ Care?” We argue that Gorin's case against pediatric gender-affirming care rests upon numerous false conceptual binaries: female/male, public/private, objective/subjective, and medically necessary/elective. Drawing on feminist bioethics, we show how such dichotomous thinking is both inaccurate and marginalizing of gender minorities.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 55-56 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| Journal | Hastings Center Report |
| Volume | 54 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - May 1 2024 |
Keywords
- binaries
- bioethics
- feminist
- GAC
- gender-affirming care
- pediatrics
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Health(social science)
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects
- Philosophy
- Health Policy