Bringing the patient back in: Guidelines, practice variations, and the social context of medical practice

Ann Lennarson Greer, James S. Goodwin, Jean L. Freeman, Z. Helen Wu

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

38 Scopus citations

Abstract

We challenge assumptions that have guided much research and policy aimed at understanding and reducing medical practice variation. Paramount is the focus on doctors as the cause of variation to the neglect of other possible influences. Some research literature suggests that patients, families, and the community context of practice may also influence treatment decisions. Failure to question present assumptions, despite weak evidence in support of them, may account for inability to explain persistent practice variation, develop appropriate implementable guidelines, or anticipate the effect on treatment decisions of greater patient involvement. In this paper, we discuss the weak response to the NIH Consensus Conference on early stage breast cancer because it may have reflected these problems. We urge a more complex and more empirical approach in explaining treatment choice and guidelines sensitive to the potential for value differences.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)747-761
Number of pages15
JournalInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Volume18
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2002

Keywords

  • Breast cancer
  • Consensus conference
  • Patient preferences
  • Practice guidelines
  • Practice variation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Bringing the patient back in: Guidelines, practice variations, and the social context of medical practice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this