Burden of burn: A norm-based inquiry into the influence of burn size and distress on recovery of physical and psychosocial function

James A. Fauerbach, Dennis Lezotte, Rebecca A. Hills, G. Fred Cromes, Karen Kowalske, Barbara J. De Lateur, Cleon W. Goodwin, Patricia Blakeney, David Herndon, Shelley A. Wiechman, Loren H. Engrav, David R. Patterson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

90 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This prospective, longitudinal study examined the influence of baseline physical and psychological burden on serial assessments of health-related quality of life among adults with major burns from three regional burn centers (n = 162). Physical burden groups were defined by % TBSA burned: <10%, 10% to 30%, or >30%. Psychological burden groups were de-fined by in-hospital distress using the Brief Symptom Inventory Global Severity Index T-score with scores of < 63 or ≥ 63. Analyses compared groups across level of burden and with published normative data. Assessments reflected health and function (Short Form 36) during the month before burn, at discharge, and at 6 and 12 months after burn. Physical functioning was significantly more impaired and the rate of physical recovery slower among those with either large physical burden or large psychological burden. Notably, psychosocial functioning also was more impaired and the rate of psychosocial recovery slower among those with greater psychological burden. These results suggest that, in addition to aggressive wound closure, interventions that reduce in-hospital distress may accelerate both physical and psychosocial recovery.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)21-32
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Burn Care and Rehabilitation
Volume26
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2005

Fingerprint

Psychology
Burn Units
Burns
Longitudinal Studies
Quality of Life
Prospective Studies
Equipment and Supplies
Health
Wounds and Injuries

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Surgery
  • Nursing(all)
  • Health Professions(all)
  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Burden of burn : A norm-based inquiry into the influence of burn size and distress on recovery of physical and psychosocial function. / Fauerbach, James A.; Lezotte, Dennis; Hills, Rebecca A.; Cromes, G. Fred; Kowalske, Karen; De Lateur, Barbara J.; Goodwin, Cleon W.; Blakeney, Patricia; Herndon, David; Wiechman, Shelley A.; Engrav, Loren H.; Patterson, David R.

In: Journal of Burn Care and Rehabilitation, Vol. 26, No. 1, 01.2005, p. 21-32.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fauerbach, JA, Lezotte, D, Hills, RA, Cromes, GF, Kowalske, K, De Lateur, BJ, Goodwin, CW, Blakeney, P, Herndon, D, Wiechman, SA, Engrav, LH & Patterson, DR 2005, 'Burden of burn: A norm-based inquiry into the influence of burn size and distress on recovery of physical and psychosocial function', Journal of Burn Care and Rehabilitation, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 21-32. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.BCR.0000150216.87940.AC
Fauerbach, James A. ; Lezotte, Dennis ; Hills, Rebecca A. ; Cromes, G. Fred ; Kowalske, Karen ; De Lateur, Barbara J. ; Goodwin, Cleon W. ; Blakeney, Patricia ; Herndon, David ; Wiechman, Shelley A. ; Engrav, Loren H. ; Patterson, David R. / Burden of burn : A norm-based inquiry into the influence of burn size and distress on recovery of physical and psychosocial function. In: Journal of Burn Care and Rehabilitation. 2005 ; Vol. 26, No. 1. pp. 21-32.
@article{ec1ec36736f04246a967d67aad2e2935,
title = "Burden of burn: A norm-based inquiry into the influence of burn size and distress on recovery of physical and psychosocial function",
abstract = "This prospective, longitudinal study examined the influence of baseline physical and psychological burden on serial assessments of health-related quality of life among adults with major burns from three regional burn centers (n = 162). Physical burden groups were defined by {\%} TBSA burned: <10{\%}, 10{\%} to 30{\%}, or >30{\%}. Psychological burden groups were de-fined by in-hospital distress using the Brief Symptom Inventory Global Severity Index T-score with scores of < 63 or ≥ 63. Analyses compared groups across level of burden and with published normative data. Assessments reflected health and function (Short Form 36) during the month before burn, at discharge, and at 6 and 12 months after burn. Physical functioning was significantly more impaired and the rate of physical recovery slower among those with either large physical burden or large psychological burden. Notably, psychosocial functioning also was more impaired and the rate of psychosocial recovery slower among those with greater psychological burden. These results suggest that, in addition to aggressive wound closure, interventions that reduce in-hospital distress may accelerate both physical and psychosocial recovery.",
author = "Fauerbach, {James A.} and Dennis Lezotte and Hills, {Rebecca A.} and Cromes, {G. Fred} and Karen Kowalske and {De Lateur}, {Barbara J.} and Goodwin, {Cleon W.} and Patricia Blakeney and David Herndon and Wiechman, {Shelley A.} and Engrav, {Loren H.} and Patterson, {David R.}",
year = "2005",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1097/01.BCR.0000150216.87940.AC",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "21--32",
journal = "Journal of Burn Care and Research",
issn = "1559-047X",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Burden of burn

T2 - A norm-based inquiry into the influence of burn size and distress on recovery of physical and psychosocial function

AU - Fauerbach, James A.

AU - Lezotte, Dennis

AU - Hills, Rebecca A.

AU - Cromes, G. Fred

AU - Kowalske, Karen

AU - De Lateur, Barbara J.

AU - Goodwin, Cleon W.

AU - Blakeney, Patricia

AU - Herndon, David

AU - Wiechman, Shelley A.

AU - Engrav, Loren H.

AU - Patterson, David R.

PY - 2005/1

Y1 - 2005/1

N2 - This prospective, longitudinal study examined the influence of baseline physical and psychological burden on serial assessments of health-related quality of life among adults with major burns from three regional burn centers (n = 162). Physical burden groups were defined by % TBSA burned: <10%, 10% to 30%, or >30%. Psychological burden groups were de-fined by in-hospital distress using the Brief Symptom Inventory Global Severity Index T-score with scores of < 63 or ≥ 63. Analyses compared groups across level of burden and with published normative data. Assessments reflected health and function (Short Form 36) during the month before burn, at discharge, and at 6 and 12 months after burn. Physical functioning was significantly more impaired and the rate of physical recovery slower among those with either large physical burden or large psychological burden. Notably, psychosocial functioning also was more impaired and the rate of psychosocial recovery slower among those with greater psychological burden. These results suggest that, in addition to aggressive wound closure, interventions that reduce in-hospital distress may accelerate both physical and psychosocial recovery.

AB - This prospective, longitudinal study examined the influence of baseline physical and psychological burden on serial assessments of health-related quality of life among adults with major burns from three regional burn centers (n = 162). Physical burden groups were defined by % TBSA burned: <10%, 10% to 30%, or >30%. Psychological burden groups were de-fined by in-hospital distress using the Brief Symptom Inventory Global Severity Index T-score with scores of < 63 or ≥ 63. Analyses compared groups across level of burden and with published normative data. Assessments reflected health and function (Short Form 36) during the month before burn, at discharge, and at 6 and 12 months after burn. Physical functioning was significantly more impaired and the rate of physical recovery slower among those with either large physical burden or large psychological burden. Notably, psychosocial functioning also was more impaired and the rate of psychosocial recovery slower among those with greater psychological burden. These results suggest that, in addition to aggressive wound closure, interventions that reduce in-hospital distress may accelerate both physical and psychosocial recovery.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=19944427590&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=19944427590&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.BCR.0000150216.87940.AC

DO - 10.1097/01.BCR.0000150216.87940.AC

M3 - Article

C2 - 15640730

AN - SCOPUS:19944427590

VL - 26

SP - 21

EP - 32

JO - Journal of Burn Care and Research

JF - Journal of Burn Care and Research

SN - 1559-047X

IS - 1

ER -