Calibration of methods for determining numbers of dorsal root ganglion cells

Richard E. Coggeshall, Russell Laforte, Caroline M. Klein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

90 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Numbers of primary afferent neurons underlie important generalizations concerning the organization of primary sensory systems. A major difficulty, however, is that different investigators do not agree on the neuronal counts. The problem, in our opinion, is that the various methods used to determine these numbers do not provide the same results. Thus to be certain that a method provides accurate counts, calibration is necessary. To do this, true numbers of ganglion cells were determined by serially reconstructing significant parts of four rat lumbar dorsal root ganglion cell populations. Then 6 commonly used methods of counting neurons were used to determine neuron numbers for these same populations. The data indicate that the empirical method, using the modifications recommended in this paper, estimates numbers of neurons with the needed accuracy whereas the other 5 do not. Thus, of the tested counting procedures, the empirical method is recommended. If other methods are to be used, they should also be calibrated.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)187-194
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Neuroscience Methods
Volume35
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1990

Fingerprint

Spinal Ganglia
Calibration
Neurons
Afferent Neurons
Ganglia
Population
Cell Count
Research Personnel

Keywords

  • Dorsal root ganglion cells
  • Neuron counting
  • Rat

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Calibration of methods for determining numbers of dorsal root ganglion cells. / Coggeshall, Richard E.; Laforte, Russell; Klein, Caroline M.

In: Journal of Neuroscience Methods, Vol. 35, No. 3, 1990, p. 187-194.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Coggeshall, Richard E. ; Laforte, Russell ; Klein, Caroline M. / Calibration of methods for determining numbers of dorsal root ganglion cells. In: Journal of Neuroscience Methods. 1990 ; Vol. 35, No. 3. pp. 187-194.
@article{442ce39c0b64499ca55b4b13c0ac8734,
title = "Calibration of methods for determining numbers of dorsal root ganglion cells",
abstract = "Numbers of primary afferent neurons underlie important generalizations concerning the organization of primary sensory systems. A major difficulty, however, is that different investigators do not agree on the neuronal counts. The problem, in our opinion, is that the various methods used to determine these numbers do not provide the same results. Thus to be certain that a method provides accurate counts, calibration is necessary. To do this, true numbers of ganglion cells were determined by serially reconstructing significant parts of four rat lumbar dorsal root ganglion cell populations. Then 6 commonly used methods of counting neurons were used to determine neuron numbers for these same populations. The data indicate that the empirical method, using the modifications recommended in this paper, estimates numbers of neurons with the needed accuracy whereas the other 5 do not. Thus, of the tested counting procedures, the empirical method is recommended. If other methods are to be used, they should also be calibrated.",
keywords = "Dorsal root ganglion cells, Neuron counting, Rat",
author = "Coggeshall, {Richard E.} and Russell Laforte and Klein, {Caroline M.}",
year = "1990",
doi = "10.1016/0165-0270(90)90123-W",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "187--194",
journal = "Journal of Neuroscience Methods",
issn = "0165-0270",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Calibration of methods for determining numbers of dorsal root ganglion cells

AU - Coggeshall, Richard E.

AU - Laforte, Russell

AU - Klein, Caroline M.

PY - 1990

Y1 - 1990

N2 - Numbers of primary afferent neurons underlie important generalizations concerning the organization of primary sensory systems. A major difficulty, however, is that different investigators do not agree on the neuronal counts. The problem, in our opinion, is that the various methods used to determine these numbers do not provide the same results. Thus to be certain that a method provides accurate counts, calibration is necessary. To do this, true numbers of ganglion cells were determined by serially reconstructing significant parts of four rat lumbar dorsal root ganglion cell populations. Then 6 commonly used methods of counting neurons were used to determine neuron numbers for these same populations. The data indicate that the empirical method, using the modifications recommended in this paper, estimates numbers of neurons with the needed accuracy whereas the other 5 do not. Thus, of the tested counting procedures, the empirical method is recommended. If other methods are to be used, they should also be calibrated.

AB - Numbers of primary afferent neurons underlie important generalizations concerning the organization of primary sensory systems. A major difficulty, however, is that different investigators do not agree on the neuronal counts. The problem, in our opinion, is that the various methods used to determine these numbers do not provide the same results. Thus to be certain that a method provides accurate counts, calibration is necessary. To do this, true numbers of ganglion cells were determined by serially reconstructing significant parts of four rat lumbar dorsal root ganglion cell populations. Then 6 commonly used methods of counting neurons were used to determine neuron numbers for these same populations. The data indicate that the empirical method, using the modifications recommended in this paper, estimates numbers of neurons with the needed accuracy whereas the other 5 do not. Thus, of the tested counting procedures, the empirical method is recommended. If other methods are to be used, they should also be calibrated.

KW - Dorsal root ganglion cells

KW - Neuron counting

KW - Rat

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025600322&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025600322&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0165-0270(90)90123-W

DO - 10.1016/0165-0270(90)90123-W

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 187

EP - 194

JO - Journal of Neuroscience Methods

JF - Journal of Neuroscience Methods

SN - 0165-0270

IS - 3

ER -