TY - JOUR
T1 - Calibration of methods for determining numbers of dorsal root ganglion cells
AU - Coggeshall, Richard E.
AU - La Forte, Russell
AU - Klein, Caroline M.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors are grateful to Tamara Sherburn and Marshall Orr for technical assistance and Lyn Schilling for secretarial assistance. The computer program for the Rose and Rohrlich (1987) method was kindly supplied by Dr. Steven MacMahon, United Medical and Dental Schools, University of London. This work was supported by NIH grants NS10161, NSl1255, NS07185, and the Bristol-Myers Company.
PY - 1990/12
Y1 - 1990/12
N2 - Numbers of primary afferent neurons underlie important generalizations concerning the organization of primary sensory systems. A major difficulty, however, is that different investigators do not agree on the neuronal counts. The problem, in our opinion, is that the various methods used to determine these numbers do not provide the same results. Thus to be certain that a method provides accurate counts, calibration is necessary. To do this, true numbers of ganglion cells were determined by serially reconstructing significant parts of four rat lumbar dorsal root ganglion cell populations. Then 6 commonly used methods of counting neurons were used to determine neuron numbers for these same populations. The data indicate that the empirical method, using the modifications recommended in this paper, estimates numbers of neurons with the needed accuracy whereas the other 5 do not. Thus, of the tested counting procedures, the empirical method is recommended. If other methods are to be used, they should also be calibrated.
AB - Numbers of primary afferent neurons underlie important generalizations concerning the organization of primary sensory systems. A major difficulty, however, is that different investigators do not agree on the neuronal counts. The problem, in our opinion, is that the various methods used to determine these numbers do not provide the same results. Thus to be certain that a method provides accurate counts, calibration is necessary. To do this, true numbers of ganglion cells were determined by serially reconstructing significant parts of four rat lumbar dorsal root ganglion cell populations. Then 6 commonly used methods of counting neurons were used to determine neuron numbers for these same populations. The data indicate that the empirical method, using the modifications recommended in this paper, estimates numbers of neurons with the needed accuracy whereas the other 5 do not. Thus, of the tested counting procedures, the empirical method is recommended. If other methods are to be used, they should also be calibrated.
KW - Dorsal root ganglion cells
KW - Neuron counting
KW - Rat
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025600322&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025600322&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/0165-0270(90)90123-W
DO - 10.1016/0165-0270(90)90123-W
M3 - Article
C2 - 2084389
AN - SCOPUS:0025600322
SN - 0165-0270
VL - 35
SP - 187
EP - 194
JO - Journal of Neuroscience Methods
JF - Journal of Neuroscience Methods
IS - 3
ER -